A survey of health information exchange organizations in the united states: Implications for meaningful use

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 154, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 666-671

  Adler Milstein, Julia ^a   Bates, David W ^a   Jha, Ashish K ^b  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79956341962     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-10-201105170-00006     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1477-1479. [PMID: 19321856]
2. Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:382-385.[PMID: 20042745]
3. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:501-504. [PMID: 20647183]
4. Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Middleton B. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10-W5-18. [PMID: 15659453]
5. Rudin RS, Simon SR, Volk LA, Tripathi M, Bates D. Understanding the decisions and values of stakeholders in health information exchanges: experiences from Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:950-955. [PMID: 19299671]
6. Tripathi M, Delano D, Lund B, Rudolph L. Engaging patients for health information exchange. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:435-43. [PMID: 19276000]
7. Markle Foundation. Attitudes of Americans Regarding Personal Health Records and Nationwide Electronic Health Information Exchange. 2005. Accessed at www.phrconference.org/assets/research_release_101105.pdf on 21 March 2011.
8. Fontaine P, Zink T, Boyle RG, Kralewski J. Health information exchange: participation by Minnesota primary care practices. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170: 622-629. [PMID: 20386006]
9. Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Jha AK. U.S. regional health information organizations: progress and challenges. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:483-492.[PMID: 19276008]
10. eHealth Initiative. Map of Health Information Exchange Activity in the US. Washington, DC: eHealth Initiative; 2009. Accessed at www.ehealthinitiative.org/hie-report-data on 21 March 2011.
11. Adler-Milstein J, McAfee AP, Bates DW, Jha AK. The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27:w60-w69. [PMID: 18073225]
12. Brown, BB. Delphi Process: A Methodology Used for the Elicitation of Opinions of Experts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 1968.
13. Wright A, Soran C, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Bates DW, Simon SR. Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:66-70. [PMID: 20064804]
14. Blumenthal D. Requirements and Recommendations for the State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Programs. Washington, DC: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2010.
15. Grossman JM, Bodenheimer TS, McKenzie K. Hospital-physician portals: the role of competition in driving clinical data exchange. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25:1629-1636. [PMID: 17102188]