Pollination: The price of attraction

Current Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 17, 2012, Pages

  Whitehead, Michael R ^a   Phillips, Ryan D ^a   Peakall, Rod ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PETUNIA;

EID: 84866161853     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.072     Document Type: Short Survey

References (20)

1. R.A. Raguso Flowers as sensory billboards: progress towards an integrated understanding of floral advertisement Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7 2004 434 440 (Pubitemid 38871618)
2. A. Brandenburg, A. Dell'Olivo, R. Bshary, and C. Kuhlemeier The sweetest thing: advances in nectar research Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12 2009 486 490
3. M. Zimmerman Plant reproduction and optimal foraging: experimental nectar manipulations in Delphinium nelsonii Oikos 41 1983 57 63 (Pubitemid 14273195)
4. J.D. Ackerman, J.A. Rodriguez-Robles, and E.J. Melendez A meager nectar offering by an epiphytic orchid is better than nothing Biotropica 26 1994 44 49
5. R.J. Mitchell Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: observation and experiment in the field Evolution 47 1993 25 35
6. G.H. Pyke What does it cost a plant to produce floral nectar? Nature 350 1991 58 59 (Pubitemid 21926119)
7. J. Jersáková, and S.D. Johnson Lack of reward promotes outcrossing: nectar supplementation experiment with Disa pulchra (Orchidaceae) S. Afr. J. Bot. 73 2007 328
8. J. Jersáková, S.D. Johnson, P. Kindlmann, and A.-C. Pupin Effect of nectar supplementation on male and female components of pollination success in the deceptive orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina Acta Oecologica 33 2008 300 306
9. S.D. Johnson, C.I. Peter, and J. Agren The effects of nectar addition on pollen removal and geitonogamy in the non-rewarding orchid Anacamptis morio Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271 2004 803 809 (Pubitemid 38491266)
10. A. Brandenburg, C. Kuhlemeier, and R. Bshary Hawkmoth pollinators decrease seed set of a low-nectar Petunia axillaris line through reduced probing time Curr. Biol. 22 2012 1635 1639
11. D. Kessler, K. Gase, and I.T. Baldwin Field experiments with transformed plants reveal the sense of floral scents Science 321 2008 1200 1202
12. D. Kessler, and I.T. Baldwin Back to the past for pollination biology Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14 2011 429 434
13. F.P. Schiestl, R. Peakall, J.G. Mant, F. Ibarra, C. Schulz, S. Franke, and W. Francke The chemistry of sexual deception in an orchid-wasp pollination system Science 302 2003 437 438 (Pubitemid 37296267)
14. M.R. Whitehead, and R. Peakall Integrating floral scent, pollination ecology and population genetics Funct. Ecol. 23 2009 863 874
15. U. Klahre, A. Gurba, K. Hermann, M. Saxenhofer, E. Bossolini, Patrick M. Guerin, and C. Kuhlemeier Pollinator choice in Petunia depends on two major genetic loci for floral scent production Curr. Biol. 21 2011 730 739
16. J. Jersáková, S.D. Johnson, and P. Kindlmann Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids Biol. Rev. 81 2006 219 235 (Pubitemid 44092341)
17. F.P. Schiestl On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids Naturwissenschaften 92 2005 255 264
18. S. Cozzolino, and A. Widmer Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 2005 487 494 (Pubitemid 41207084)
19. J.D. Karron, C.T. Ivey, R.J. Mitchell, M.R. Whitehead, R. Peakall, and A.L. Case New perspectives on the evolution of plant mating systems Ann. Bot. 109 2012 493 503
20. R.J. Mitchell Heritability of nectar traits: why do we know so little? Ecology 85 2004 1527 1533 (Pubitemid 39188143)