Can Originalism be saved?

Boston University Law Review

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1161-1170

  Strauss, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866099069     PISSN: 00068047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. JACK M. BALKIN, LIVING ORIGINALISM (2011).
2. 410 U. S. 113 (1973).
3. 347 U. S. 483 (1954).
4. See, e.g., Alexander M. Bickel, The Original Understanding and the Segregation Decision, 69 HARV. L. REV. 1, 56 (1955).
5. The outstanding exception is Michael W. McConnell, Originalism and the Desegregation Decisions, 81 VA. L. REV. 947 (1995).
6. Brown, 347 U. S. at 489.
7. See, e.g., ROBERT H. BORK, THE TEMPTING OF AMERICA 82 (1990).
8. See RANDY BARNET, RESTORING THE LOST CONSTITUTION: THE PRESUMPTION OF LIBERTY 118-27 (2004);
9. KEITH E. WHITTTNGTON, CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUCTION: DIVIDED POWERS AND CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING 5 (1999).
10. This view of the Just Compensation Clause is advanced in RICHARD A. EPSTEIN, TAKINGS: PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE POWER OF EMINENT DOMAIN 297-303 (1985).
11. See, e.g., Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co., 337 U. S. 582, 646-47 (1949) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting);
12. United States v. Lovett, 328 U. S. 303, 321 (1946) (Frankfurter, J., concurring);
13. RONALD DWORKIN, FREEDOM'S LAW: THE MORAL READING OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION 7-8 (1996);
14. LEARNED HAND, THE BILL OF RIGHTS 22-24 (1960);
15. Herbert Wechsler, Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law, in PRINCIPLES, POLITICS & FUNDAMENTAL LAW 3, 24 (Herbert Wechsler ed., 1961).
16. U. S. CONST, amend. I.
17. See generally David Alan Sklansky, Anti-Inquisitorialism, 122 HARV. L. REV. 1634 (2009).
18. See, e.g., Schmerber v. California, 384 U. S. 757, 779 (1966) (Fortas, J., dissenting).
19. See, e.g., Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety Comm'n, 430 U. S. 442, 461 (1977).