P300 latency and amplitude in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 126-132

  Pedroso, Renata Valle ^a   Fraga, Francisco J ^b   Corazza, Danilla Icassatti ^a   Andreatto, Carla Andrezza Almeida ^a   Coelho, Flávia Gomes de Melo ^a   Costa, José Luiz Riani ^c   Santos Galduróz, Ruth Ferreira ^a,d  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ABC   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Aging; Alzheimer disease; Cognition; Event related potentials; P300

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866028692     PISSN: 18088694     EISSN: 18088686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1808-86942012000400023     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Goodin DS, Aminoff MJ. Evaluation of dementia by event-related potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;9(4):521-5.
2. Polich J, Ladish C, Bloom FE. P300 assessment of early Alzheimer's disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;77(3):179-89.
3. Frodl T, Hampel H, Juckel G, Bürger K, Padberg F, Engel RR, et al. Value of event-related P300 subcomponents in the clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Psychophy-siology. 2002;39(2):175-81.
4. Polich J, Corey-Bloom J. Alzheimer's disease and P300: review and evaluation of task and modality. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2005;2(5):515-25.
5. Halgren E, Squires NK, Wilson CL, Rohrbaugh JW, Babb TL, Crandall PH. Endogenous potentials in the human hippocampal formation and amygdala by infrequent events. Science. 1980;210(4471):803-5.
6. Oken BS. Endogenous event-related potentials. In: Chiappa KH. (ed). Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. New York: Raven Press; 1990. p.563-92.
7. Polich, J. Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(10)2128-48.
8. Polich J. Normal variation of P300 from auditory stimuli. Electroen-cephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986;65(3):236-40.
9. Ball SS, Marsh JT, Schubarth G, Brown WS, Strandburg R. Longitudinal P300 latency changes in Alzheimer's disease. J Gerontol. 1989;44(6):M195-200.
10. Golob EJ, Starr A. Effects of stimulus sequence on event-related potentials and reaction time during target detection in Alzheimer's Disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111(8):1438-49.
11. Patterson JV, Michalewski HJ, Starr A. Latency variability of the components of auditory event-related potentials to infrequent stimuli in aging, Alzheimer type dementia, and depression. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;71(6):450-60.
12. Donchin E, Coles MGH. Is the P300 component a manifestation of cognitive updating? Behav Brain Sci. 1988;11(3):357-427.
13. Gironell A, Garcia-Sanchez C, Estevez-Gonzalez A, Boltes A, Ku-lisevsky J. Usefulness of P300 in subjective memory complaints: a prospective study. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;22(4):279-84.
14. Verleger R. Event-related potentials and cognition: a critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behav Brain Sci. 1988;11(3):343-56.
15. Frodl-Bauch T, Bottlender R, Hegerl U. Neurochemical substrates and neuroanatomical generators of the event-related P300. Neurop-sychobiology. 1999;40(2):86-94.
16. Molnár M. On the origin of the P3 event-related potential component. Int J Psychophysiol. 1994;17(2):129-34.
17. Smith ME, Halgren E, Sokolik M, Baudena P, Musolino A, Liegeois-Chauvel C, et al. The intracranial topography of the P3 event-related potential elicited during auditory oddball. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;76(3):235-48.
18. Ito J, Yamao S, Fukuda H, Fukuda H, Mimori Y, Nakamura S. The P300 event-related potentials in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Correlations between P300 and monoamine metabolites. Electroen-cephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;77(3):174-8.
19. Maurer K, Dierks T. Functional imaging procedures in dementias: mapping of EEG and evoked potentials. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1992;139:40-6.
20. Caravaglios G, Costanzo E, Palermo F, Muscoso, EG. Decreased amplitude of auditory event-related delta responses in Alzheimers disease. Int J Psychophysiol. 2008;70(1):23-32.
21. O'Mahony D, Coffey J, Murphy J, OHare N, Hamilton D, Rowan M, et al. Event-related potential prolongation in Alzheimers disease signifies frontal lobe impairment: evidence from SPECT imaging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1996;51(3):102-7.
22. Lai CL, Lin RT, Liou LM, Liu CK. The role of event-related potentials in cognitive decline in Alzheimer's Disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121(2):194-9.
23. Yamaguchi S, Tsuchiya H, Yamagata S, Toyoda G, Kobayashi S. Event-related brain potentials in response to novel sounds in dementia. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111(2):195-203.
24. Bennys K, Portet F, Touchon J, Rondouin G. Diagnostic value of event related evoked potentials N200 and P300 subcomponents in early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;24(5):405-12.
25. Polich J. Clinical application of the P300 event-related brain potential. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2004;15(1):133-61.
26. Juckel G, Clotz F, Frodl T, Kawohl W, Hampel H, Pogarell O, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of cognitive auditory event-related P300 subcomponents in patients with Alzheimers disease? J Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;25(3):147-52.
27. McPherson DL. Late potentials of the auditory system. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1996.
28. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-Mental State". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-98.
29. Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bottino CMC, Damasceno BP, Brucki SMD, Anghinah R. Diagnóstico de doença de Alzheimer no Brasil: avaliação cognitiva e funcional. Recomendações do Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento da Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2005;63(3):720-7.
30. Freitas EV. Tratado de geriatria e gerontologia. Rio de Janeiro: Gua-nabara Koogan; 2006.
31. Nash AJ, Fernandez M. P300 and allocation of attention in dual-tasks. Int J Psychophysiol. 1996;23(3):171-80.
32. Fein G, Turetsky B. P300 latency variability in normal elderly: effects of paradigm and measurement technique. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;72(5):384-94.
33. Goodin DS, Squires KC, Starr A. Variations in early and late event-related components of the auditory evoked potential with task difficulty. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983;55(6):680-6.
34. Polich J, Howard L, Starr A. Effects of age on the P300 component of the event-related potential from auditory stimuli: peak definition, variation, and measurement. J Gerontol. 1985;40(6):721-6.
35. Squires KC, Hecox KE. Electrophysiological evaluation of higher level auditory processing. Semin Hear. 1983;4:415-33.
36. Winkler I, Paavilainen P, Alho K, Reinikainen K, Sams M, Näätänen R. The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on the event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus. Psycho-physiology. 1990;27(2):228-35.
37. Sugg MJ, Polich J. P300 from auditory stimuli: intensity and frequency effects. Biol Psychol. 1995;41(3):255-69.
38. Polich J. Habituation of P300 from auditory stimuli. Psychobiology. 1989;17(1):19-28.
39. Carrillo-de-la-Peña MT, García-Larrea L. On the validity of interblock averaging of P300 in clinical settings. Int J Psychophysiol. 1989;34(2):103-12.
40. Spirduso W. Dimensões Física do Envelhecimento. São Paulo: Manole; 2005.
41. Papanicolau AC, Loring DW, Raz N, Eisenberg HM. Relationship between stimulus intensity and the P300. Psychophysiology. 1985;22(3):326-9.
42. Duarte JL, Alvarenga KF, Costa OA. Potencial cognitivo P300 realizado em campo livre: aplicabilidade do teste. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2004;70(6):780-5.
43. Cesar HAR, Munhoz MSL. O P300 auditivo em jovens e adultos sau-dáveis com uma nova proposta de resposta: levantar a mão. Acta Awho. 1999;18(1)32-7.