Augmented visual feedback of movement performance to enhance walking recovery after stroke: Study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

Trials

Volumn 13, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Thikey, Heather ^a   Grealy, Madeleine ^a   van Wijck, Frederike ^b   Barber, Mark ^c   Rowe, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c MONKLANDS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Gait; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Visual feedback

Indexed keywords

PLACEBO;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BIOMECHANICS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GAIT; HUMAN; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PILOT STUDY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION CARE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SURVIVOR; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL FEEDBACK; WALKING;

BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EXERCISE TEST; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; GAIT; HUMANS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PILOT PROJECTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RESEARCH DESIGN; SCOTLAND; SOFTWARE DESIGN; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WALKING;

EID: 84865973350     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-163     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adamson J. Is stroke the most common cause of disability?. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2004, 13:171-177. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.06.003, 17903971.
2. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/resources/atlas/en/.
3. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients - the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995, 76:27-32. 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80038-7, 7811170.
4. States RA, Pappas E, Salem Y. Overground physical therapy gait training for chronic stroke patients with mobility deficits [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, 3:CD006075. 10.1002/14651858.CD006075.pub2, 19588381.
5. Richards CL, Malouin F, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Bouchard JP, Brunet D. Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. Am Congr Rehabil Med Am Acad Phys Med Rehabil 1993, 74:612-620.
6. Van Vliet PM, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence?. Disabil Rehabil 2006, 28:831-840. 10.1080/09638280500534937, 16777770.
7. Molier BI, Van Asseldonk EHF, Hermens HJ, Jannink JA. Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2010, 32:1799-1809. 10.3109/09638281003734359, 20345249.
8. Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, 9:CD008349. 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub2, 21901720.
9. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J 2008, 337:a1655.
10. Tyson S, Connell L. The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2009, 23:1018-1033. 10.1177/0269215509339004, 19786420.
11. Viosca E, Martinez JL, Almagro PL, Gracia A, Gonzalez C. Proposal and validation of a new functional ambulation classification scale for clinical use. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:1234-1238. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.016, 15954065.
12. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed 'Up & Go': a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991, 39:142-148.
13. Lord FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Studies 1991, 13:54.
14. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Bode RK, Perera S, DeRosa J. Stroke Impact Scale-16: a brief assessment of physical function. Neurology 2003, 60:291-296. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000041493.65665.D6, 12552047.
15. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Baddeley A, Hiorns R. The development and validation of a test battery for detecting and monitoring everyday memory problems. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1989, 11:855-870. 10.1080/01688638908400940, 2592527.
16. Robertson I, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The Test of Everyday Attention 1994, Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.
17. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Halligan PW. Behavioural Inattention Test 1987, Titchfield, Hants, England: Thames Valley Test Company.
18. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991, 22:1521-1526.