Exploring the development of cultural and art consciousness in istanbul: A study of interior design students

Journal of Interior Design

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 19-30

  Yalcin Usal, S Selhan ^a   Evcil, A Nilay ^b  

^a HALIC UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BEYKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865871383     PISSN: 10717641     EISSN: 19391668     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1668.2011.01064.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aydin, K., (2009). Social stratification of culture and leisure in Turkey. Cultural Trends, 18(4), 295-311.DOI: 10.1080/09548960903268113.
2. Berlyne, D. E., (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation.Oxford, UK: Taylor and Francis.
3. Bourdieu, P., (2007). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (revised ed.).London: Routledge.
4. Devlin, K., and Nasar, J. L., (1989). The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of ‘high’ versus ‘popular’ residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9(4), 333-344.DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80013-1.
5. Gans, H. J., (1999). Popular culture and high culture (revised ed.).New York: Basic Books.
6. Gifford, R., (1980). Judgments of the built environment as a function of individual differences and context. Journal of Man-Environment Relations, 1(1), 22-31.
7. Gifford, R., Hine, D. W., Muller-Clemm, W., Reynolds, D. J., and Shaw, K. T., (2000). Decoding modern architecture: A lens model approach for understanding the aesthetic differences of architects and laypersons. Environment and Behavior, 32(2), 163-187.DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.202.
8. Groat, L., (1982). Meaning in post-modern architecture: An examination using the multiple sorting task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2(1), 3-22.DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(82)80002-9.
9. Gronow, J., (1997). The sociology of taste.London: Routledge.
10. Hume, D., (1975). Of the standard of taste. In essays, moral, political and literary (revised ed.).Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Jara-Díaz, S. R., (1989). Income and taste in mode choice models: Are they surrogates? Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 25(5), 341-350.DOI: 10.1016/0191-2615(91)90027-G.
12. Jeffers, C. S., (1997). Discovering a gap: A comparison of personal and educational aesthetic preferences of students and teachers. Studies in Art Education, 39(1), 57-73.
13. Kälviäinen, M., (1999). Customer taste as a challenge in the design process. Proceedings of the 3rd EAD Conference on Design Cultures (Vol. 2, pp. 78-102), Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Hallam University.
14. Kant, I., (2008). The critique of judgment. Australia: University of Adelaide. Retrieved September 20, 2010, from http://www.ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/k/kant/immanuel/k16j/.
15. Keane, L., and Keane, M., (2001). The culture of design education.In C.Coleman(Ed.), Interior design handbook of professional practice(pp. 92-125). NY: McGraw-Hill Professional.
16. Kotler, P., and Armstrong, G., (1999). Principles of marketing (revised ed.).Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
17. Mann, D. A., (1979). Architecture, aesthetics, and pluralism: Theories of taste as a determinant of architectural standards. Studies in Art Education, 20(3), 15-29.
18. Pantzar, M., (2000). Consumption as work, play, and art: Representation of the consumer in future scenarios. Design Issues, 16(3), 3-18.
19. Schiller, J. C. F., (2001). Letters upon the aesthetic education of man. New York, Bartleby.com. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from http://www.bartleby.com/32/501.html.
20. Schirrmacher, R., (1988). Art and creative development for young children.Albany, NY: Delmar Publisher Inc.
21. Taylor, A. B., and Helmstadter, G. C., (1971). A preliminary pair comparison test for measuring aesthetic judgment in young children. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY, 4-7 February. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (ED048351).
22. Veblen, T., (1994). The theory of leisure class.New York: Penguin Books.
23. Wenchun, W., and Kazuhiro, I., (2002). Aesthetic development in cross-cultural contexts: A study of art appreciation in Japan, Taiwan and The United States. Studies in Art Education, 43(4), 373-391.
24. Wilson, M. A., (1996). The socialization of architectural preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(1), 33-44.
25. Woodward, I., and Emmison, M., (2001). From aesthetic principles to collective sentiments: The logic of everyday judgments of taste. Poetics, 29(6), 295-316.DOI: 10.1177/0004869003394005.
26. Yalcintan, M. C., and Thornley, A., (2007). Turkey’s foundation universities and the case of Koç University in Istanbul. Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy, 25(6), 822-843.DOI:10.1068/c0580.