The socialization of architectural preference

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 33-44

  Wilson, Margaret A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030101182     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jevp.1996.0003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Blau, J. (1980). A framework of meaning in architecture. In G. Broadbent, R. Brunt & C. Jencks, Eds, Signs, Symbols and Architecture. London: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Canter, D. (1969). An intergroup comparison of connotative dimensions in architecture. Environment and Behaviour, 1, 37-48.
3. Devlin, K. (1990). An examination of architectural interpretation: architects vs non architects. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 7, 235-243.
4. Donald, I. (1994). The structure of office workers' experience of organizational environments. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 241-258.
5. Donald, I. & Canter, D. (1990). Temporal and trait facets of personnel assessment. Applied Psychology, An International Review, 39, 413-429.
6. Edwards, M. (1974). Comparison of some expectations of a sample of housing architects with known data. In D. Canter & T. Lee, Eds, Pscyhology and the Built Environment. London: Architectural Press.
7. Groat, L. (1982). Meaning in Post Modern architecture: an examination using the multiple sorting task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2, 2-22.
8. Groat, L. & Canter, D. (1979). Does Post Modernism communicate? Progressive Architecture, December, 84-87.
9. Henschen, T. & Hershenson, D. B. (1975). Values, interests and architectural preferences. Man-Environment Systems, 5, 239-244.
10. Hershberger, R. G. (1969). A study of meaning and architecture. In H. Sanoff & S. Cohen, Eds, EDRA 1. Radleigh: North Carolina State University, pp. 86-100.
11. Jencks, C. (1977). The Language of Post Modern Architecture. London: Academy Editions.
12. Lawson, B. (1980). How Designers Think. London: Architectural Press.
13. Leff, H. S. & Deutch, P. S. (1974). Construing the physical environment: differences between environmental professionals and lay persons. In W. Preiser, Ed., Environmental Design Research, Vol. I, Selected Papers, EDRA 4. University of Maryland: EDRA, pp. 284-297.
14. Lipman, A. (1970). Architectural education and the social commitment of contemporary British architecture. The Sociological Review, 18, 5-27.
15. Mackintosh, E. (1982). High in the city. In P. Bart, A. Chen & G. Francescato, Eds, Knowledge for Design, EDRA 13. University of Maryland: EDRA, pp. 424-434.
16. Nasar, J. L. (1989). Symbolic meanings of house style. Environment and Behaviour, 21, 235-257.
17. Shye, S., Elizur, D. & Hoffman, M. (1994). Introducing Facet Theory: Content Design and Intrinsic Data Analysis in Behavioural Research. London: Sage.
18. Stringer, P. (1977). Participating in personal construct theory. In D. Bannister, Ed., New Perspective in Personal Construct Theory. London: Academic Press.
19. Wilson, M. A. & Canter, D. (1990a). The development of professional concepts. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39, 431-455.
20. Wilson, M. & Canter, D. (1990b). Who's who in architecture: a study of architectural heroes. In H. Pamir, V. Imamoglu & N. Teymur, Eds, Culture, Space, History, Volume 5. Ankara: METU, pp. 43-54.