Serine phosphorylation and proline isomerization in RNAP II CTD control recruitment of Nrdl

Genes and Development

Volumn 26, Issue 17, 2012, Pages 1891-1896

  Kubicek, Karel ^a   Cerna, Hana ^a   Holub, Peter ^a   Pasulka, Josef ^a   Hrossova, Dominika ^a   Loehr, Frank ^b   Hofr, Ctirad ^a   Vanacova, Stepanka ^a   Stefl, Richard ^a  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

CTD code; NMR spectroscopy; Phosphorylation; Proline isomerization; RNA polymerase II; RNA processing and degradation; Structure

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; PROLINE; PROTEIN NRD1; RNA POLYMERASE II; SERINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UNTRANSLATED RNA;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE MUTATION; ISOMERIZATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

CELL SURVIVAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROLINE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RNA POLYMERASE II; RNA, UNTRANSLATED; RNA-BINDING PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SERINE;

EID: 84865845346     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.192781.112     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arigo JT, Eyler DE, Carroll KL, Corden JL. 2006. Termination of cryptic unstable transcripts is directed by yeast RNA-binding proteins Nrd1 and Nab3. Mol Cell 23: 841-851.
2. Bataille AR, Jeronimo C, Jacques PE, Laramee L, Fortin ME, Forest A, Bergeron M, Hanes SD, Robert F. 2012. A universal RNA polymerase II CTD cycle is orchestrated by complex interplays between kinase, phosphatase, and isomerase enzymes along genes. Mol Cell 45: 158-170.
3. Becker R, Loll B, Meinhart A. 2008. Snapshots of the RNA processing factor SCAF8 bound to different phosphorylated forms of the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. J Biol Chem 283: 22659-22669.
4. Buratowski S. 2003. The CTD code. Nat Struct Biol 10: 679-680.
5. Buratowski S. 2009. Progression through the RNA polymerase II CTD cycle. Mol Cell 36: 541-546.
6. Case DA, Cheatham TE III, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM Jr, Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ. 2005. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26: 1668-1688.
7. Chapman RD, Heidemann M, Hintermair C, Eick D. 2008. Molecular evolution of the RNA polymerase II CTD. Trends Genet 24: 289-296.
8. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. 1995. A 2nd generation force-field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic-acids, and organic-molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117: 5179-5197.
9. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. 1995. NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biol NMR 6: 277-293.
10. Egloff S, Murphy S. 2008. Cracking the RNA polymerase II CTD code. Trends Genet 24: 280-288.
11. Gemmill TR, Wu X, Hanes SD. 2005. Vanishingly low levels of Ess1 prolyl-isomerase activity are sufficient for growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280: 15510-15517.
12. Gudipati RK, Villa T, Boulay J, Libri D. 2008. Phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain dictates transcription termination choice. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15: 786-794.
13. Guntert P. 2004. Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA. Methods Mol Biol 278: 353-378.
14. Heyduk T, Lee JC. 1990. Application of fluorescence energy transfer and polarization to monitor Escherichia call cAMP receptor protein and lac promoter interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87: 1744-1748.
15. Hirose Y, Manley JL. 2000. RNA polymerase II and the integration of nuclear events. Genes Dev 14: 1415-1429.
16. Hobor F, Pergoli R, Kubicek K, Hrossova D, Bacikova V, Zimmermann M, Pasulka J, Hofr C, Vanacova S, Stefl R. 2011. Recognition of transcription termination signal by the nuclear polyadenylated RNA-binding (NAB) 3 protein. J Biol Chem 286: 3645-3657.
17. Kim H, Erickson B, Luo W, Seward D, Graber JH, Pollock DD, Megee PC, Bentley DL. 2010. Gene-specific RNA polymerase II phosphorylation and the CTD code. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 1279-1286.
18. Komarnitsky P, Cho EJ, Buratowski S. 2000. Different phosphorylated forms of RNA polymerase II and associated mRNA processing factors during transcription. Genes Dev 14: 2452-2460.
19. Koradi R, Billeter M, Wuthrich K. 1996. MOLMOL: A program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graph 14: 51-55.
20. 15N resonance assignments for the CTD-interacting domain of Nrdl bound to Ser5-phosphorylated CTD of RNA polymerase II. Biomol NMR Assign 5: 203-205.
21. LaCava J, Houseley J, Saveanu C, Petfalski E, Thompson E, Jacquier A, Tollervey D. 2005. RNA degradation by the exosome is promoted by a nuclear polyadenylation complex. Cell 121: 713-724.
22. Lunde BM, Reichow SL, Kim M, Suh H, Leeper TC, Yang F, Mutschler H, Buratowski S, Meinhart A, Varani G. 2010. Cooperative interaction of transcription termination factors with the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 1195-1201.
23. Maniatis T, Reed R. 2002. An extensive network of coupling among gene expression machines. Nature 416: 499-506.
24. Mayer A, Lidschreiber M, Siebert M, Leike K, Soding J, Cramer P. 2010. Uniform transitions of the general RNA polymerase II transcription complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 1272-1278.
25. Mayr LM, Willbold D, Rösch P, Schmid FX. 1994. Generation of a non-prolyl cis peptide bond in ribonuclease T1. J Mol Biol 240: 288-293.
26. Meinhart A, Cramer P. 2004. Recognition of RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain by 3′-RNA-processing factors. Nature 430: 223-226.
27. Meinhart A, Kamenski T, Hoeppner S, Baumli S, Cramer P. 2005. A structural perspective of CTD function. Genes Dev 19: 1401-1415.
28. Peterson RD, Theimer CA, Wu H, Feigon J. 2004. New applications of 2D filtered/edited NOESY for assignment and structure elucidation of RNA and RNA-protein complexes. J Biol NMR 28: 59-67.
29. Phatnani HP, Greenleaf AL. 2006. Phosphorylation and functions of the RNA polymerase II CTD. Genes Dev 20: 2922-2936.
30. Singh N, Ma Z, Gemmill T, Wu X, Defiglio H, Rossettini A, Rabeler C, Beane O, Morse RH, Palumbo MJ, et al. 2009. The Ess1 prolyl isomerase is required for transcription termination of small non-coding RNAs via the Nrd1 pathway. Mol Cell 36: 255-266.
31. Stefl R, Oberstrass FC, Hood JL, Jourdan M, Zimmermann M, Skrisovska L, Maris C, Peng L, Hofr C, Emeson RB, et al. 2010. The solution structure of the ADAR2 dsRBM-RNA complex reveals a sequence-specific readout of the minor groove. Cell 143: 225-237.
32. Steinmetz EJ, Brow DA. 1998. Control of pre-mRNA accumulation by the essential yeast protein Nrdl requires high-affinity transcript binding and a domain implicated in RNA polymerase II association. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 6699-6704.
33. Steinmetz EJ, Conrad NK, Brow DA, Corden JL. 2001. RNA-binding protein Nrdl directs poly(A)-independent 3′-end formation of RNA polymerase II transcripts. Nature 413: 327-331.
34. Thiebaut M, Kisseleva-Romanova E, Rougemaille M, Boulay J, Libri D. 2006. Transcription termination and nuclear degradation of cryptic unstable transcripts: A role for the nrdl-nab3 pathway in genome surveillance. Mol Cell 23: 853-864.
35. Tietjen JR, Zhang DW, Rodriguez-Molina JB, White BE, Akhtar MS, Heidemann M, Li X, Chapman RD, Shokat K, Keles S, et al. 2010. Chemical-genomic dissection of the CTD code. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 1154-1161.
36. Vanacova S, Wolf J, Martin G, Blank D, Dettwiler S, Friedlein A, Langen H, Keith G, Keller W. 2005. A new yeast poly(A) polymerase complex involved in RNA quality control. PLoS Biol 3: e189. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030189.
37. Vasiljeva L, Buratowski S. 2006. Nrdl interacts with the nuclear exosome for 3′ processing of RNA polymerase II transcripts. Mol Cell 21: 239-248.
38. Vasiljeva L, Kim M, Mutschler H, Buratowski S, Meinhart A. 2008a. The Nrd1-Nab3-Sen1 termination complex interacts with the Ser5-phosphorylated RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15: 795-804.
39. Vasiljeva L, Kim M, Terzi N, Soares LM, Buratowski S. 2008b. Transcription termination and RNA degradation contribute to silencing of RNA polymerase II transcription within heterochromatin. Mol Cell 29: 313-323.
40. Werner-Allen JW, Lee CJ, Liu P, Nicely NI, Wang S, Greenleaf AL, Zhou P. 2011. Cis-proline-mediated Ser(P)5 dephosphorylation by the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain phosphatase Ssu72. J Biol Chem 286: 5717-5726.
41. Xiang K, Nagaike T, Xiang S, Kilic T, Behav MM, Manley JL, Tong L. 2010. Crystal structure of the human symplekin-Ssu72-CTD phosphopeptide complex. Nature 467: 729-733.
42. Xiong Y, Juminaga D, Swapna GV, Wedemeyer WJ, Scheraga HA, Montelione GT. 2000. Solution NMR evidence for a cis Tyr-Ala peptide group in the structure of [Pro93Ala] bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A. Protein Sci 9: 421-426.
43. Zhang DW, Mosley AL, Ramisetty SR, Rodriguez-Molina JB, Washburn MP, Ansari AZ. 2012. Ssu72 phosphatase-dependent erasure of phospho-Ser7 marks on the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain is essential for viability and transcription termination. J Biol Chem 287: 8541-8551.
44. Zwahlen C, Legault P, Vincent SJF, Greenblatt J, Konrat R, Kay LE. 1997. Methods for measurement of intermolecular NOEs by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy: Application to a bacteriophage X N-peptide/boxB RNA complex. J Am Chem Soc 119: 6711-6721.