Project Clarion: Three Years of Science Instruction in Title I Schools among K-Third Grade Students

Research in Science Education

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 813-829

  Kim, Kyung Hee ^a   VanTassel Baska, Joyce ^a   Bracken, Bruce A ^a   Feng, Annie ^a   Stambaugh, Tamra ^a   Bland, Lori ^a  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

Concept development; Concept mapping; Gifted; Inquiry based learning; Low income learners; Primary age level or early childhood; Science curriculum

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865831395     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-011-9218-5     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Borko, H., Mayfield, V., Marion, S., Flexer, R., & Cumbo, K. (1993). Teachers developing ideas and practices about mathematics performance assessment: successes, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 259-278.
2. Borman, G. D., & Hewes, G. M. (2002). The long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of success for all. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 243-266.
3. Boyer, P., Bedoin, N., & Honore, S. (2001). Relative contributions of kind- and domain-level concepts to expectations concerning unfamiliar exemplars: developmental change and domain differences. Cognitive Development, 15, 457-479.
4. Bracken, B. A. (1986). Bracken concept development program. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
5. Bracken, B. A. (1998). Bracken basic concept scale-revised. San Antonio: Harcourt Assessments.
6. Bracken, B. A., & Crawford, E. (2006, June). Project Clarion: A concept-based science curriculum. Paper presented at the National Association for the Education of Young People 15th National Institute for Early Childhood Professional Development, San Antonio, TX.
7. Bracken, B. A., Bai, W., Fithian, E., Lamprecht, S., Little, C., & Quek, C. (2003). Test of critical thinking. Williamsburg: The College of William and Mary, Center for Gifted Education.
8. Campbell, F. A., & Ramey, C. T. (1995). Cognitive and school outcomes for high-risk African-American students at middle adolescence: positive effects of early intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 743-772.
9. Chi, M. T. H., Hutchinson, J. E., & Robins, A. F. (1989). How inferences about novel domain-related concepts can be constrained by structural knowledge. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 27-62.
10. Glynn, S. M., & Winter, L. K. (2004). Contextual teaching and learning of science in elementary schools. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16(2), 51-63.
11. Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement. (2000). Metropolitan achievement test (8th ed.). San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment.
12. Johnson, M. A., & Lawson, A. E. (1998). What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 89-103.
13. Kimball, S. M. (2002). Analysis of feedback, enabling conditions, and fairness perceptions. University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Research in Education.
14. Krajcik, J. S. (1991). Developing students' understanding of chemical concepts. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science: International perspective on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments (pp. 117-145). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
15. Kwon, Y., & Lawson, A. E. (2000). Linking brain growth with the development of scientific reasoning ability and conceptual change during adolescence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 44-62.
16. Linn, M. C., & Songer, N. B. (1991). Cognitive and conceptual change in adolescence. American Journal of Education, 99, 379-417.
17. Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (1998). Teaching science for understanding. San Diego: Academic.
18. Naglieri, J. A. (1991). Naglieri nonverbal ability test. San Antonio: Harcourt Assessments.
19. National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). The nation's report card: Science 2000. Washington: United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
20. National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Pursuing excellence: Comparisons of international eighth-grade mathematics and science achievement from a U. S. perspective, 1995 and 1999. Washington: United States Department of Education.
21. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
22. National Research Council. (2002). Learning and understanding: Improving advanced study of mathematics and science in U. S. high schools. Washington: National Academy Press.
23. National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in classroom. Washington: National Academy Press.
24. Novack, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
25. Office of Child Development. (1965). Recommendations for a head start program by a panel of experts. Washington: U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
26. Pankratius, W. J. (1990). Building an organized knowledge base: concept mapping and achievement in secondary school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 315-333.
27. Pine, K. J., & Messer, D. J. (2000). The effect of explaining another's actions on children's implicit theories of balance. Cognition & Instruction, 18, 35-51.
28. Quinn, P. C., & Eimas, P. D. (1997). A reexamination of the perceptual-to-conceptual shift in mental representations. Review of General Psychology, 1, 271-287.
29. Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (1998). Early intervention and early experience. American Psychologist, 53, 109-120.
30. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. E., Congdon, R., & du Toit, M. (2004). HLM6: Hierarchical linear and non-linear modeling. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
31. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural understanding: does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 175-189.
32. Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVASS) database: implications for educational research and evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 247-256.
33. Sanders, W. I., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
34. Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P. (1983). The effects of the Perry preschool program on youths through age 15: A summary. In Consortium for longitudinal studies, as the twig is bent-lasting effects of preschool programs. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1986). Effective curriculum and instructional models for talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 164-169.
36. VanTassel-Baska, J., Quek, C., & Feng, A. (2005). The classroom observation scale-revised. Williamsburg: The College of William and Mary, Center for Gifted Education.
37. Wardekker, W. L. (1998). Scientific concepts and reflection. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5, 143-153.
38. Zeigler, E. F. (1995). Competency in critical thinking: a requirement for the "Allied Professional". Quest, 47, 196-211.