The Inspection House and Neglected Dynamics of Governance: The Case of Domestic Visits in Family Intervention Projects

Housing Studies

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 822-838

  Flint, John ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

family intervention projects; Governance; panopticon

Indexed keywords

CLASS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FAMILY STRUCTURE; PHILOSOPHY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84865827566     PISSN: 02673037     EISSN: 14661810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2012.714465     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Aldridge, J., Shute, J., Ralphs, R. and Medina, J. 2011. Blame the parents? Challenges for parent-focused programmes for families of gang-involved young people. Children and Society, 25(5): 371-381.
2. Allen, C. 2008. Housing Market Renewal and Social Class, London: Routledge.
3. Atkinson, R. and Kintrea, K. 2004. Opportunities and despair, its all in there: Practitioner experiences and explanantions of area effects and life chances. Sociology, 38(3): 437-455.
4. Barnes, J., Ball, M., Meadows, B., McLeish, J. and Belsky, J. 2008. Nurse-Family Partnership Programme: First Year Pilot Sites Implementation in England: Pregnancy and the Post-Partnum Period, London: Department for Children, Schools and Families and Department of Health.
5. Batty, E. and Flint, J. 2011. Evaluation of Rochdale Families Project: Narratives of Family Backgrounds, Interventions and Outcomes, Sheffield: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research.
6. Batty, E. and Flint, J. 2012. Conceptualising the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of intensive family intervention projects. Social Policy and Society, 11(3): 345-358.
7. Batty, E., Casey, C., Flint, J. and Parr, S. 2011. Evaluation of Rochdale Families Project: Summary of Key Findings and Messages, Sheffield: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research.
8. Bentham, J. 1995. The Panopticon Writings, Edited by: Bozovic, M. London: Verso.
9. Bovaird, T. 2007. Beyond engagement and participation: user and community co-production of services. Public Administration Review, 67(5): 846-860.
10. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11. Boyne, R. 2000. Post-panopticism. Economy and Society, 29(2): 285-307.
12. Carr, H. 2009. Looking again at discipline and gender: Theoretical concerns and possibilities in the study of anti-social behaviour initiatives. Social Policy and Society, 9(1): 77-87.
13. Chadwick, H. 1964. The Reformation: The Penguin History of the Church 3, London: Penguin.
14. Charlesworth, S. 2000. A Phenomenology of Working Class Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Collins, M. 2004. The Likes of Us: A Biography of the White Working Class, London: Granta.
16. Cruikshank, B. 1999. The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects, London: Cornell University Press.
17. Damer, S. 2000. Engineers of the human machine: The social practice of council housing management in Glasgow, 1895-1939. Urban Studies, 37(11): 2007-2026.
18. Davidoff, L. and Hall, C. 1987. Family Fortunes, London: Hutchison.
19. De Swann, A. 1989. In Care of the State: Health, Education and Welfare in Europe and the USA in the Modern Era, Cambridge: Polity Press.
20. Dillane, J., Hill, M., Bannister, J. and Scott, S. 2001. Evaluation of the Dundee Families Project, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
21. Elias, N. 2000. The Civilizing Process, Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Finset, A. 2010. Emotions, narratives and empathy in clinical communication. International Journal of Integrated Care, 10(1): 53-56.
23. Flint, J. 2011a. The role of sanctions in intensive support and rehabilitation: Rhetoric, rationalities and realities. British Journal of Criminal Justice, 9(1): 55-67.
24. Flint, J. 2011b. Housing studies, social class and being towards dwelling. Housing, Theory and Society, 28(1): 75-91.
25. Flint, J., Batty, E., Parr, S., Platts-Fowler, D., Nixon, J. and Sanderson, D. 2011a. Evaluation of Intensive Intervention Projects, London: Department for Education.
26. Flint, J., Batty, E., Parr, S., Platts-Fowler, D., Nixon, J. and Sanderson, D. 2011b. Evaluation of Intensive Intervention Projects: Annex 1: Narratives of Young People's Journeys, London: Department for Education.
27. Franklin, B. 2000. Demands, expectations and responses: the shaping of housing management. Housing Studies, 15(6): 907-927.
28. Frauley, J. 2007. Towards an archaeological-realist foucauldian analytics of Government. British Journal of Criminology, 47(4): 617-637.
29. Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Modern Prison, New York: Random House.
30. Foucault, M. 1978. History of Sexuality, Volume 1: The Will to Knowledge, New York: Pantheon.
31. Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, Edited by: Gordon, C. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
32. Foucault, M. 1982. "Afterword". In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Edited by: Dreyfus, H. L. and Rabinbow, P. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
33. Foucault, M. 1991. "Governmentality". In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Edited by: Burchell, G. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
34. Gaines, A. D. and Davis-Floyd, R. 2003. "On biomedicine". In Encyclopedia of Medical Anthropology, Edited by: Ember, C. and Ember, M. NewYork: Springer.
35. Garrett, P. M. 2004. The electronic eye: Emerging surveillant practices in social work with children and families. European Journal of Social Work, 7(1): 57-71.
36. Garrett, P. M. 2007a. Sinbin solutions: The pioneer projects for problem families and the forgetfulness of social policy research. Critical Social Policy, 27(2): 203-230.
37. Garrett, P. M. 2007b. Sinbin research and the lives of others: A rejoinder in an emerging and necessary debate. Critical Social Policy, 27(4): 560-564.
38. Gentoo Sunderland. 2007. Excellent Customer Scheme, Sunderland: Gentoo Sunderland.
39. Gregg, D. 2010. Family Intervention Projects: A Classic Case of Policy-based Evidence, London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
40. Hamm, T. 2009. Examining 'Social Investment' policy in a multi-ethnic sure start area: Staff perspectives. Social Policy and Society, 9(4): 503-514.
41. HM Government. 2010. Drug Strategy 2010-Reducing Demand, Restricting Supply, Building Recovery: Supporting People to Live a Drug Free Life, London: HM Government.
42. Home Office. 2011. More Effective Responses to Anti-social Behaviour, London: Home Office.
43. Holt, A. 2008. "Room for resistance? Parenting orders, disciplinary power and the production of 'the bad parent'". In ASBO Nation: The Criminalisation of Nuisance, Edited by: Squires, P. Bristol: Policy Press.
44. Holt, A. 2009. Disciplining 'Problem Parents' in the youth court: Between regulation and resistance. Social Policy and Society, 9(1): 89-99.
45. Hunt, T. 2004. Building Jerusalem: The Rise and Fall of the Victorian City, London: Phoenix.
46. Keane, H. 2003. Critiques of harm reduction, morality and the promise of human rights. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14(3): 227-232.
47. Kerr, D. 1999. Beheading the king and enthroning the market: A critique of foucauldian governmentality. Science and Society, 63(2): 173-202.
48. King, P. 2008. In Dwelling: Implacability, Exclusion and Acceptance, Aldershot: Ashgate.
49. Koskela, H. 2010. Did you spot an alien? Voluntary vigilance, Borderwork and the Texas Virtual Border Watch Program. Space and Polity, 14(2): 103-121.
50. Lever, J. 2011. Urban regeneration partnerships: A figurational critique of governmentality theory. Sociology, 45(1): 86-101.
51. Lyon, D., ed. 2006. Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
52. Maruna, S. 2004. Desistence from Crime and Explanatory Style: New Direction in the Psychology of Reform. Journal of Contemporary Justice, 20(4): 184-200.
53. McKee, K. 2009. Post-foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis?. Critical Social Policy, 29(3): 465-486.
54. McKee, K. 2011. Sceptical, disorderly and paradoxical subjects: Problematizing the 'Will to Empower' in social housing governance. Housing, Theory and Society, 28(1): 1-18.
55. McNay, L. 2009. Self as enterprise: Dilemmas of control and resistance in foucault's The Birth of Biopolitics. Theory, Culture and Society, 26(6): 55-77.
56. Morgan, J. 2010. Family intervention tenancies: The de (marginalisation) of social tenants?. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 32(1): 37-46.
57. Morris, K. and Featherstone, B. 2010. Investing in children, regulating parents, thinking family: A decade of tensions and contradictions. Social Policy and Society, 9(4): 557-566.
58. Murray, L. and Barnes, M. 2010. Have families been rethought? Ethic of care, Family and 'Whole Family' approaches. Social Policy and Society, 9(4): 533-544.
59. Nixon, J., Parr, S., Hunter, C., Myers, S., Sanderson, D. and Whittle, S. 2006. Anti-social Behaviour Intensive Family Support Projects: An Evaluation of Six Pioneering Projects, London: Communities and Local Government.
60. Overy, R. 2009. The Morbid Age: Britain and the Crisis of Civilization, London: Penguin.
61. Parr, S. 2008. Family intervention projects: A site of social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 39(7): 1256-1273.
62. Parr, S. 2009. Confronting the reality of anti-social behaviour. Theoretical Criminology, 13(3): 363-381.
63. Parr, S. and Nixon, J. 2009. "Family intervention projects; sites of subversion and resilience". In Subversive Citizens: Power, Agency and Resistance in Public Services, Edited by: Barnes, M. and Prior, D. Bristol: Policy Press.
64. Pawson, H., Davidson, E., Sosenko, F., Flint, J., Nixon, J., Casey, R. and Sanderson, D. 2009. Evaluation of Intensive Family Support Projects in Scotland, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
65. Pemberton, S. and Mason, J. 2008. Co-production and Sure StartChildren's Centres Reflecting upon Users Perspectives and Implications for Service Delivery, Planning and Evaluation. Social Policy and Society, 8(1): 13-24.
66. Ravetz, A. 2001. Council Housing and Culture: The History of a Social Experiment, London: Routledge.
67. Reid, H. 2010. The Reformation: The Dangerous Birth of the Modern World, Edinburgh: St Andrews Press.
68. Respect Task Force. 2006. Respect Action Plan, London: Respect Task Force.
69. Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Rose, N. 2000. Government and Control. British Journal of Criminology, 40: 321-339.
71. Schneider, B. 2009. Housing People with Mental Illnesses: The Discursive Construction of Worthiness. Housing, Theory and Society, 27(4): 296-312.
72. Skeggs, B. 2004. Class, Self, Culture, London: Routledge.
73. Skeggs, B. and Wood, H. 2009. The labour of transformation and circuits of value 'around' reality television. Continuum, 22(4): 559-572.
74. Somerville, P. 2011. "Understanding Community: Politics". In Policy and Practice, Bristol: Policy Press.
75. Starkey, P. 2002. Can the Piper Call the Tune? Innovation and Experiment with Deprived Families in Britain, 1940-1980s: The Work of Family Service Units. British Journal of Social Work, 32: 573-587.
76. Stenson, K. 2005. Sovereignty, biopolitics and the local government of crime in Britain. Theoretical Criminology, 9(3): 265-287.
77. Stokoe, E. 2003. Mothers, single women and sluts: Gender, morality and membership categorization in neighbour disputes. Feminism and Psychology, 13(3): 317-344.
78. Summerscale, K. 2008. The Suspicions of Mr Whicker or the Murder at Road Hill House, London: Bloomsbury.
79. Ullmann-Margalit, E. 2008. The case of the camera in the kitchen: Surveillance, privacy, sanctions, and governance. Regulation and Governance, 2(4): 425-444.
80. Valentine, K. 2007. Methadone maintenance treatment and making up people. Sociology, 41(3): 497-514.
81. Van Krieken, R. 1998. Norbert Elias, London: Routledge.
82. Watt, P. 2006. Respectability, roughness and race: Neighbourhood place images and the making of working-class distinctions in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(4): 776-797.
83. Welshman, J. 2008. Recuperation and rehabilitation and the residential option: The Brentwood centre for mothers and children. Twentieth Century British History, 19(4): 502-519.
84. White, C., Warrener, M., Reeves, A. and LaValle, I. 2008. Family Intervention Projects: An Evaluation of Their Design, Set Up and Early Outcomes, London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
85. Young, M. and Willmott, P. 1957. Family and Kinship in East London, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
86. Zadoroznyi, M. 2009. Professionals, carers of 'Strangers'? Liminality and the typification of postnatal home care workers. Sociology, 43(2): 268-285.