Sectional curvature in terms of the cometric, with applications to the Riemannian manifolds of landmarks

SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 394-433

  Micheli, Mario ^a   Michor, Peter ^b   Mumford, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cometric; Landmark points; Sectional curvature; Shape spaces

Indexed keywords

COMETRIC; D DIMENSIONS; DIFFEOMORPHISMS; GROUP ACTIONS; LANDMARK POINTS; METRIC TENSOR; NONZERO MOMENTA; PARTIAL DERIVATIVES; RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLD; RIEMANNIAN METRICS; SECTIONAL CURVATURE; SHAPE SPACE; TWO-POINT;

GEOMETRY;

EID: 84865812947     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19364954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/10081678X     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, New York, 1964.
2. S. Allassonnière, Y. Amit, and A. Trouvé, Toward a coherent statistical framework for dense deformabletemplate estimation, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol., 69 (2007), pp. 3-29.
3. V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed., Grad. Texts in Math. 60, Springer, New York, 1989.
4. M. F. Beg, M. I. Miller, A. Trouvé, and L. Younes, Computing large deformation metric mappingsvia geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 61 (2005), pp. 139-157.
5. Y. Cao, M. I. Miller, S. Mori, R. L. Winslow, and L. Younes, Diffeomorphic matching of diffusiontensor images, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR '06), New York, 2006.
6. Y. Cao, M. I. Miller, R. L. Winslow, and L. Younes, Large deformation diffeomorphic metricmapping of vector fields, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 24 (2005), pp. 1216-1230.
7. C. Chicone, Ordinary Differential Equations and Applications, Texts Appl. Math. 34, Springer, NewYork, 1999.
8. S. Durrleman, M. Prastawa, G. Gerig, and S. Joshi, Optimal data-driven sparse parameterization ofdiffeomorphisms for population analysis, in Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on InformationProcessing in Medical Imaging (IPMI), Bavaria, Germany, 2011.
9. L. C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, Grad. Stud. Math. 19, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998.
10. S. Gallot, D. Hulin, and J. Jacques Lafontaine, Riemannian Geometry, 3rd ed., Springer, Berlin,2004.
11. J. Glaunès, Transport par difféomorphismes de points, de mesures et de courants pour la comparaisonde formes et l'anatomie numérique, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris 13, Villetaneuse, France, 2005.
12. J. Glaunès, A. Qiu, M. I. Miller, and L. Younes, Large deformation diffeomorphic metric curvemapping, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 80 (2008), pp. 317-336.
13. J. Glaunès, A. Trouvé, and L. Younes, Diffeomorphic matching of distributions: A new approach forunlabeled point-sets and sub-manifolds matching, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on ComputerVision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '04), Vol. 2, Washington, DC, 2004, pp. 712-718.
14. J. Glaunès, M. Vaillant, and M. I. Miller, Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphismson the sphere, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 20 (2004), pp. 170-200.
15. S. C. Joshi and M. I. Miller, Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 9 (2000), pp. 1357-1370.
16. J. Jost, Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis, 5th ed., Springer, New York, 2008.
17. D. G. Kendall, Shape manifolds, Procrustean metrics, and complex projective spaces, Bull. LondonMath. Soc., 16 (1984), pp. 81-121.
18. E. Klassen, A. Srivastava, W. Mio, and S. Joshi, Analysis of planar shapes using geodesic paths onshape spaces, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 26 (2004), pp. 372-383.
19. A. Kriegl and P. W. Michor, The Convenient Setting of Global Analysis, Math. Surveys Monogr. 53, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997.
20. S. Kushnarev, Teichons: Soliton-like geodesics on universal Teichmüller space, Experiment. Math., 18(2009), pp. 325-336.
21. J. M. Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature, Grad. Texts in Math. 176, Springer, New York, 1997.
22. R. L. McLachlan and S. Marsland, N-particle dynamics of the Euler equations for planar diffeomorphisms, Dyn. Syst., 22 (2007), pp. 269-290.
23. M. Micheli, The Geometry of Landmark Shape Spaces: Metrics, Geodesics, and Curvature, Ph.D. thesis, Brown University, Providence, RI, 2008.
24. P. W. Michor, Topics in Differential Geometry, Grad. Stud. Math. 93, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008.
25. P. W. Michor and D. Mumford, Riemannian geometries on spaces of plane curves, J. Eur. Math. Soc.(JEMS), 8 (2006), pp. 1-48.
26. P. W. Michor and D. Mumford, An overview of the Riemannian metrics on spaces of curves usingthe Hamiltonian approach, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 23 (2007), pp. 74-113.
27. M. I. Miller and L. Younes, Group actions, homeomorphisms, and matching: A general framework, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 41 (2001), pp. 61-84.
28. E. Sharon and D. Mumford, 2D-shape analysis using conformal mapping, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 70(2006), pp. 55-75.
29. S. Sommer, F. Lauze, M. Nielsen, and X. Pennec, Kernel Bundle EPDiff: Evolution equations formulti-scale diffeomorphic image registration, in Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Scale Space andVariational Methods in Computer Vision (SSVM), Ein-Gedi, Israel, 2011.
30. G. Sundaramoorthi, A. Yezzi, and A. Mennucci, Sobolev active contours, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 73(2007), pp. 345-366.
31. L. Younes, Shapes and Diffeomorphisms, Appl. Math. Sci. 171, Springer, Berlin, 2010.
32. L. Younes, P. W. Michor, J. Shah, and D. Mumford, A metric on shape space with explicit geodesics, Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur. Rend. Lincei (9) Mat. Appl., 19 (2008), pp. 25-57.
33. S. Zhang, L. Younes, J. Zweck, and J. T. Ratnanather, Diffeomorphic surface flows: A novelmethod of surface evolution, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 68 (2008), pp. 806-824.