2D-shape analysis using conformal mapping

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 55-75

  Sharon, E ^a   Mumford, D ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conformal; Fingerprints of shapes; Geodesic; Group of diffeomorphisms; Group of shape transformations; Metrics between shapes; Riemann mapping theorem; Shape representation; Weil Petersson metric

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL; FINGERPRINTS OF SHAPES; GEODESIC; GROUP OF DIFFEOMORPHISMS; GROUP OF SHAPE TRANSFORMATIONS; METRICS BETWEEN SHAPES; RIEMANN MAPPING THEOREM; SHAPE REPRESENTATION; WEIL-PETERSSON METRIC;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER VISION; GEODESY; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

CONFORMAL MAPPING;

EID: 33744948196     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: 15731405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-006-6121-z     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Amit, Y., Grenander, U., and Piccioni, M. 1991. Structural image restoration through deformable templates. J Am Statis Assoc, 86(414):376-387.
2. Basri, R., Costa, L., Geiger, D., and Jacobs, D. 1998. Determining the similarity of deformable shapes. Vision Research, 38:2365-2385.
3. Belongie, S., Malik, J., and Puzicha, J. 2002. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. PAMI, 24(4):509-522.
4. Biederman, I. 1985. Human image understanding: recent research and a theory. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 32:29-73.
5. 1)/SL(2, R). J. of Math. Physics, 29:1979-1981, South Carolina.
6. Carlsson, S. 1999. Order structure, correspondence and shape based categories. International Workshop on Shape, Contour and Grouping, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, p. 1681.
7. Driscoll. T.A. 1996. A MATLAB toolbox for Schwarz-Christoffel mapping. ACM Trans. Math. Soft., 22:168-186.
8. Driscoll, T. and Trefethen, L.N. 2002. Schwarz-Chrsitoffel Mapping. Cambridge Univ. Press.
9. Gdalyahu, Y. and Weinshall, D. 1999. Flexible syntactic matching of curves and its application to automatichierarchical classification of silhouettes. PAMI, 21(12):1312-1328.
10. Geiger, D., Gupta, A., Costa, L., and Vlontzos, J. 1995. Dynamic programming for detecting, tracking and matching deformable contours. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 17(3):294-302.
11. Hildreth, E. 1984. The Measurement of Visual Motion. MIT Press, Cambridge.
12. Kass, M., Witkin, A., and Terzopoulos, D. 1988. Snakes: Active contour models. IJCV, I(4):321-331.
13. Kimia, B.B. Tannenbaum, A.R., and Zucker, S.W. 1995. Shapes, shocks, and deformations. IJCV, 15(3):189-224.
14. Mumford, D. 1991. Mathematical theories of shape: do they model perception? SPIE Geom Meth Comp Vis, 1570:2-10.
15. Sclaroff, S. and Pentland, A. 1995. Modal matching for correspondence and recognition. PAMI, 17(6):545-561.
16. Sebastian, T.B., Klein. P.N., and Kimia, B.B. 2001. Recognition of shapes by editing shock graphs. ICCV, pp. 755-762.
17. Stephenson, K. 2005. Introduction to Circle Packing. Cambridge University Press.
18. Ullman, S. 1989. Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32(3):193-254.
19. Yuille, A. 1991. Deformable templates for face recognition. J. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(1):59-71.