Measuring perinatal outcomes-why, when,and how: Abritish perspective

NeoReviews

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Lal, Mithilesh ^a   Tin, Win ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865797015     PISSN: 15269906     EISSN: 15269906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/neo.13-9-e515     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Doyle LW; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Evaluation of neonatal intensive care for extremely low birth weight infants in Victoria over two decades: I. Effectiveness. Pediatrics. 2004;113(3 pt 1):505-509
2. Tin W, Wariyar U, Hey E; Northern Neonatal Nursing Initiative Trial Group. Randomised trial of prophylactic early fresh-frozen plasma or gelatin or glucose in preterm babies: outcome at 2 years. Lancet. 1996;348(9022):229-232
3. Schmidt B, Davis P, Moddemann D, et al; Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms Investigators. Long-term effects of indomethacin prophylaxis in extremely-lowbirth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(26):1966-1972
4. Schmidt B, Roberts RS, Davis P, et al; Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity Trial Group. Long-term effects of caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(19):1893-1902
5. Brocklehurst P, Farrell B, King A, et al; INIS Collaborative Group. Treatment of neonatal sepsis with intravenous immune globulin. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(13): 1201-1211
6. Tin W, Lal M. Discharge planning and follow up of the NICU graduate. In: Donn SM, Sinha SK, eds. Manual of Neonatal Respiratory Care. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media; 2012:723-730
7. Schmidt B, Asztalos EV, Roberts RS, Robertson CM, Sauve RS, Whitfield MF; Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP) Investigators. Impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, brain injury, and severe retinopathy on the outcome of extremely low-birth-weight infants at 18 months: results from the trial of indomethacin prophylaxis in preterms. JAMA. 2003;289(9):1124-1129
8. Drillien CM. Abnormal neurologic signs in the first year of life in low-birthweight infants: possible prognostic significance. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1972;14(5):575-584
9. Sattler J. Assessment of Children: Cognitive Application. 4th ed. LaMesa, CA: Jerome M. Sattler; 2001
10. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M; EPICure Study Group. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(1):9-19
11. Johnson S, Fawke J, Hennessy E, et al. Neurodevelopmental disability through 11 years of age in children born before 26 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2009;124(2): e249-e257
12. Saigal S, Hoult LA, Streiner DL, Stoskopf BL, Rosenbaum PL. School difficulties at adolescence in a regional cohort of children who were extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics. 2000;105(2):325-331
13. Saigal S, Pinelli J, Hoult L, Kim MM, Boyle M. Psychopathology and social competencies of adolescents who were extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics. 2003; 111(5 pt 1):969-975
14. Tin W, Fritz S, Wariyar U, Hey E. Outcomeofverypreterm birth: children reviewed with ease at two differ from those only traced and reviewed with difficulty. Arch Dis Child.1998;79:F83-F87
15. Castro L, Yolton K, Haberman B, et al. Bias in reported neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight survivors. Pediatrics. 2004;114(2):404-410
16. Guillén U, DeMauro S, Ma L, et al. Relationship between attrition and neurodevelopmental impairment rates in extremely preterm infants at 18 to 24 months: a systematic review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012; 166(2):178-184
17. Huddy CLJ, Johnson A, Hope PL. Education and behaviour problems in babies of 32-35 weeks gestation. Arch Dis Child. 2001;85:F23-F28
18. Quigley MA, Poulsen G, Boyle E, et al. Early term and late preterm birth are associated with poorer school performance at age 5 years: a cohort study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97(3): F167-F173
19. Potijk MR, de Winter AF, Bos AF, Kerstjens JM, Reijneveld SA. Higher rates of behavioural and emotional problems at preschool age in children born moderately preterm. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(2): 112-117
20. Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester. LAMBS-Late And Moderate preterm Birth Study. Available at: http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/health-sciences/research/timms/projects/lambs. Accessed July 7, 2012
21. Bayley N. The Bayley Scales of Infant Development. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1969
22. Bayley N. The Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1993
23. Bayley N. The Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2006
24. Wechsler D. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1989
25. Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Roberts G, Doyle LW; Victorian Infant Collaborative Group. Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164 (4):352-356
26. Griffiths R. The Abilities of Young Children. A Comprehensive System of Mental Measurement for the First Eight Years of Life. High Wycombe, United Kingdom: The Test Agency; 1984
27. Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III UK. London, United Kingdom: Psychological Corporation; 1992
28. Huntley M ed.; for the Association for Research in Infant and Child Development. The Griffiths Mental Development Scales From Birth to 2 Years. 1996 Revision. Henley on Thames, United Kingdom: The Test Agency; 1996
29. Bellman M, Lingam S, Aukett A. Schedule of Growing Skills. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: NEFR Nelson Publishing Company; 1996
30. Aylward GP, Verhulst SJ. Predictive utility of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener (BINS) risk status classifications: clinical interpretation and application. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000; 42(1):25-31
31. Measurement of Health Status at 2 Years. Report of the Two Working Groups Convened by the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit and Oxford Regional Health Authority. Disability and Perinatal Care; 1994
32. Jones HP, Guildea ZES, Stewart JH, Cartlidge PH. The Health Status Questionnaire: achieving concordance with published disability criteria. Arch Dis Child. 2002;86 (1):15-20
33. Saudino KJ, Dale PS, Oliver B, et al. The validity of parent-based assessment of the cognitive abilities of two-year-olds. Br J Dev Psychol. 1988;16:349-363
34. Johnson S, Wolke D, Marlow N; Preterm Infant Parenting Study Group. Developmental assessment of preterm infants at 2 years: validity of parent reports. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(1): 58-62
35. Pritchard MA, Colditz PB, Beller EM; Queensland Optimising Preterm Infant Outcomes Group. Parents' evaluation of developmental status in children born with a birthweight of 1250 g or less. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41(4):191-196
36. Squires J, Bricker D, Potter L. Revision of a parent-completed development screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires. J Pediatr Psychol. 1997;22(3):313-328
37. Fooks J, Fritz S, Tin W, et al. A comparison of two methods of follow-up in a trial of prophylactic volume expansion in preterm babies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998;12(2):199-216
38. Hack M, Fanaroff AA. Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990s. Semin Neonatol. 2000;5(2):89-106
39. Johnson A. Disability and perinatal care. Pediatrics. 1995;95(2):272-274
40. Johnson A. Follow up studies: a case for a standard minimum data set. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997;76(1): F61-F63
41. British Association of Perinatal Medicine. Standards for Hospitals Providing Intensive and High Dependency Care. London, United Kingdom: BAPM; 2001
42. Classification of Health Status at 2 Years as a Perinatal Outcome. Report of a BAPM/RCPCH Working Group; 2007
43. Amiel-Tison C, Ellison P. Birth asphyxia in the fullterm newborn: early assessment and outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986;28(5):671-682
44. Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motorfunctioninchildrenwithcerebralpalsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(4):214-223
45. Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000; 42(12):816-824
46. The EPICE project home page. Available at: http://www.epiceproject.eu. Accessed July 7, 2012
47. Silverman WA. Overtreatment of neonates? A personal retrospective. Pediatrics. 1992;90(6):971-976