Relationship between attrition and neurodevelopmental impairment rates in extremely preterm infants at 18 to 24 months: A systematic review

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

Volumn 166, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 178-184

  Guillén, Úrsula ^a   DeMauro, Sara ^a   Ma, Li ^b   Zupancic, John ^c   Roberts, Robin ^d   Schmidt, Barbara ^a,d   Kirpalani, Haresh ^a,d  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^b Hebei Provincial Children's Hospital   (China)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEREBRAL PALSY; FOLLOW UP; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; NEURODEVELOPMENTAL IMPAIRMENT; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; LOST TO FOLLOW-UP; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84856760151     PISSN: 10724710     EISSN: 15383628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.616     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Ancel PY. Handicap neuro-sensoriel grave de l'enfant grand premature: aspects epidemiologiques [Severe sensorineural impairment in very premature infants: epidemiological aspects]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004;33(6, pt 1):461-474.
2. Larroque B. Les troubles du developpement des enfants grands prematures mesures a l'age scolaire: revue de la literature [Developmental problems of very premature children at school age: review of the literature]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004;33(6, pt 1):475-486. (Pubitemid 39371608)
3. Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, et al Neonatal Research Network. Center differences and outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2004;113(4):781-789. (Pubitemid 38437384)
4. Feinstein AR. Clinical Epidemiology: Architecture of Clinical Research. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1985.
5. Babbie E. Survey Research Methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1973.
6. Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2008.
7. Castro L, Yolton K, Haberman B, et al. Bias in reported neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight survivors. Pediatrics. 2004;114(2):404-410. (Pubitemid 39006668)
8. Coen JJ, Chung CS, Shipley WU, Zietman AL. Influence of follow-up bias on PSA failure after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results from a 10-year cohort analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(3):621-628. (Pubitemid 37194287)
9. Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Hannaford AP, Sutherland AM, McNeil JJ. Routine follow up ofmajor trauma patients from trauma registries: what are the outcomes? J Trauma. 2006;61(6):1393-1399. (Pubitemid 44973308)
10. de Groot S, Haisma JA, Post MWM, van Asbeck FWA, van der Woude LHV. Investigation of bias due to loss of participants in a Dutch multicentre prospective spinal cord injury cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(5):382-389.
11. Tin W, Fritz S, Wariyar U, Hey E. Outcome of very preterm birth: children reviewed with ease at 2 years differ from those followed up with difficulty. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;79(2):F83-F87. doi:10.1136/fn.79.2.F83. (Pubitemid 28419165)
12. Hille ETM, Elbertse L, Gravenhorst JB, Brand R, Verloove-Vanhorick SP; Dutch POPS-19 Collaborative Study Group. Nonresponse bias in a follow-up study of 19-year-old adolescents born as preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2005;116(5):e662-e666. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0682. (Pubitemid 46056397)
13. Sims ACP. Importance of a high tracing-rate in long-term medical follow-up studies. Lancet. 1973;2(7826):433-435.
14. Britton A, Murray D, Bulstrode C, McPherson K, Denham R. Loss to follow-up: does it matter? Lancet. 1995;345(8963):1511-1512.
15. Lundberg I, Damström Thakker K, Hällström T, Forsell Y. Determinants of non-participation, and the effects of non-participation on potential cause-effect relationships, in the PART study on mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005;40(6):475-483. (Pubitemid 41001592)
16. Thomas MC, Walker M, Lennon LT, et al. Non-attendance at re-examination 20 years after screening in the British Regional Heart Study. J Public Health Med. 2002;24(4):285-291. (Pubitemid 36043189)
17. Halliday JL, Lumley J, Sheffield LJ, Robinson HP, Renou P, Carlin JB. Importance of complete follow-up of spontaneous fetal loss after amniocentesis and chorion villus sampling. Lancet. 1992;340(8824):886-890.
18. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development: Manual. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp, Harcourt Brace & Co; 1993.
19. Schmidt B, Davis P, Moddemann D, et al Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms Investigators. Long-term effects of indomethacin prophylaxis in extremely-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(26):1966-1972. (Pubitemid 32568150)
20. Schmidt B, Roberts RS, Davis P, et al Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity Trial Group. Long-term effects of caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(19):1893-1902. (Pubitemid 350074685)
21. Adams-Chapman I, Hansen NI, Stoll BJ, Higgins R; NICHD Research Network. Neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants with post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus requiring shunt insertion. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):e1167-e1177.
22. Doyle LW; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Neonatal intensive care at borderline viability - is it worth it? Early Hum Dev. 2004;80(2):103-113.
23. Doyle LW, Roberts G, Anderson PJ; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Outcomes at age 2 years of infants <28 weeks' gestational age born in Victoria in 2005. J Pediatr. 2010;156(1):49-53, e1.
24. Gargus RA, Vohr BR, Tyson JE, et al. Unimpaired outcomes for extremely low birth weight infants at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):112-121.
25. Hack M, Wilson-Costello D, Friedman H, Taylor GH, Schluchter M, Fanaroff AA. Neurodevelopment and predictors of outcomes of children with birth weights of less than 1000 g: 1992-1995. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154(7):725-731. (Pubitemid 30437556)
26. Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Vohr BR, Kenneth Poole W, Higgins RD; NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Gender differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely preterm, extremely-low-birthweight infants. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95(10):1239-1248. (Pubitemid 44423190)
27. Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Vohr BR, Poole WK, Higgins RD; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Changes in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months' corrected age among infants of less than 25 weeks' gestational age born in 1993-1999. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):1645-1651. (Pubitemid 43843175)
28. Jacobs SE, O'Brien K, Inwood S, Kelly EN, Whyte HE. Outcome of infants 23-26 weeks' gestation pre and post surfactant. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89(8):959-965. (Pubitemid 30643733)
29. Kamper J, Feilberg Jørgensen N, Jonsbo F, Pedersen-Bjergaard L, Pryds O; Danish ETFOL Study Group. The Danish national study in infants with extremely low gestational age and birthweight (the ETFOL study): respiratory morbidity and outcome. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93(2):225-232.
30. Kutz P, Horsch S, Kühn L, Roll C. Single-centre vs. population-based outcome data of extremely preterm infants at the limits of viability. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(9):1451-1455.
31. Lainwala S, Perritt R, Poole K, Vohr B; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants who are transferred from neonatal intensive care units to level I or II nurseries. Pediatrics. 2007;119(5):e1079-e1087. (Pubitemid 46715645)
32. Mercier CE, Dunn MS, Ferrelli KR, Howard DB, Soll RF; Vermont-Oxford Network ELBW Infant Follow-Up Study Group. Neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants from the Vermont Oxford network: 1998-2003. Neonatology. 2010;97(4):329-338.
33. Rijken M, Stoelhorst GM, Martens SE, et al. Mortality and neurologic, mental, and psychomotor development at 2 years in infants born less than 27 weeks' gestation: the Leiden follow-up project on prematurity. Pediatrics. 2003;112(2):351-358. (Pubitemid 36951398)
34. Salt A, D'Amore A, Ahluwalia J, et al East Anglian Very Low Birthweight Project Group. Outcome at 2 years for very low birthweight infants in a geographical population: risk factors, cost, and impact of congenital anomalies. Early Hum Dev. 2006;82(2):125-133. (Pubitemid 43234046)
35. Sommer C, Urlesberger B, Maurer-Fellbaum U, Kutschera J, Müller W. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years in 23 to 26 weeks old gestation infants. Klin Padiatr. 2007;219(1):23-29. (Pubitemid 46980099)
36. Tommiska V, Heinonen K, Kero P, et al. A national two year follow up study of extremely low birthweight infants born in 1996-1997. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88(1):F29-F35.
37. Vohr BR, Wright LL, Poole WK, McDonald SA; NICHD Neonatal Research Network Follow-up Study. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants <32 weeks' gestation between 1993 and 1998. Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):635-643. (Pubitemid 44336680)
38. Wilson-Costello D, Friedman H, Minich N, Fanaroff AA, Hack M. Improved survival rates with increased neurodevelopmental disability for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s. Pediatrics. 2005;115(4):997-1003.
39. Wilson-Costello D, Friedman H, Minich N, et al. Improved neurodevelopmental outcomes for extremely low birth weight infants in 2000-2002. Pediatrics. 2007;119(1):37-45. (Pubitemid 46397840)
40. Gerstein DR, Johnson RA. Nonresponse and selection bias in treatment follow-up studies. Subst Use Misuse. 2000;35(6-8):971-1014.
41. Stinchfield RD, Niforopulos L, Feder SH. Follow-up contact bias in adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol. 1994;55(3):285-289. (Pubitemid 24129855)
42. Haapea M, Miettunen J, Veijola J, Lauronen E, Tanskanen P, Isohanni M. Non-participation may bias the results of a psychiatric survey: an analysis from the survey including magnetic resonance imaging within the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42(5):403-409.
43. Callanan C, Doyle L, Rickards A, Kelly E, Ford G, Davis N. Children followed with difficulty: how do they differ? J Paediatr Child Health. 2001;37(2):152-156. (Pubitemid 32398095)
44. Hille ETM, den Ouden AL, Stuifbergen MC, et al. Is attrition bias a problem in neonatal follow-up? Early Hum Dev. 2005;81(11):901-908. (Pubitemid 41726209)
45. McCormick MC, Baker J, Brooks-Gunn J, Turner J, Workman-Daniels K, Peckham GJ. Cohort reconstruction: which infants can be restudied at school age? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1991;5(4):410-422.
46. Rogowski JA, Staiger DO, Horbar JD. Variations in the quality of care for very-low-birthweight infants: implications for policy. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23(5):88-97. (Pubitemid 39310495)
47. Aylward GP, Hatcher RP, Stripp B, Gustafson NF, Leavitt LA. Who goes and who stays: subject loss in a multicenter, longitudinal follow-up study. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1985;6(1):3-8. (Pubitemid 15128524)
48. Constantine WL, Haynes CW, Spiker D, Kendall-Tackett K, Constantine NA. Recruitment and retention in a clinical trial for low birth weight, premature infants. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1993;14(1):1-7.
49. Wolke D, Söhne B, Ohrt B, Riegel K. Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts. Lancet. 1995;345(8947):447. doi:10.1016/S0140- 6736(95)90425-5.