Assessing practical usefulness and performance of the PREDIQT method: An industrial case study

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1377-1395

  Omerovic, Aida ^a   Solhaug, Bjørnar ^a   Stølen, Ketil ^a,b  

^a SINTEF ICT   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Change impact analysis; Modeling; Quality prediction; System architectural design

Indexed keywords

CHANGE IMPACT ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL CASE STUDY; INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS; INFORMED DECISION; MODEL-BASED PREDICTION; POSTMORTEM REVIEW; PREDICTION MODEL; QUALITY CHARACTERISTIC; QUALITY PREDICTION; REAL-LIFE SYSTEMS; STRUCTURED EVALUATION; STRUCTURED KNOWLEDGE; SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES; SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS; SYSTEM QUALITY; TARGET SYSTEMS; USAGE PATTERNS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; FORECASTING; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MODELS; RESEARCH;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 84865790404     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.006     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. A. Omerovic, A. Andresen, H. Grindheim, P. Myrseth, A. Refsdal, K. Stolen, J. Olnes, A Feasibility Study in Model Based Prediction of Impact of Changes on System Quality, Technical Report A13339, SINTEF, 2010.
2. A. Omerovic, B. Solhaug, K. Stolen, Evaluation of Experiences from Applying the PREDIQT Method in an Industrial Case Study, Technical Report A17562, SINTEF, 2011a.
3. A. Omerovic, B. Solhaug, and K. Stolen Evaluation of experiences from applying the PREDIQT method in an industrial case study IEEE International Conference on Secure Software Integration and Reliability Improvement (SSIRI'11) vol. 0 2011 IEEE 137 146
4. A. Omerovic, A. Andresen, H. Grindheim, P. Myrseth, A. Refsdal, K. Stolen, and J. Olnes A feasibility study in model based prediction of impact of changes on system quality International Symposium on Engineering Secure Software and Systems LNCS vol. 5965 2010 Springer 231 240
5. A. Omerovic, and K. Stolen A practical approach to uncertainty handling and estimate acquisition in model-based prediction of system quality International Journal on Advances in Systems and Measurements 4 2011 55 70
6. A. Omerovic, and K. Stolen Traceability handling in model-based prediction of system quality International Conference on Advances in System Simulation vol. 0 2011 IEEE Computer Society 71 80
7. A. Omerovic, PREDIQT: A Method for Model-based Prediction of Impacts of Architectural Design Changes on System Quality, PhD thesis, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, 2012.
8. International Organisation for Standardisation: ISO/IEC 9126 - Software engineering - Product quality, 2004.
9. R.K. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods third ed. Applied Social Research Methods Series vol. 5 2002 Sage Publications, Inc
10. J. Rumbaugh, I. Jacobson, and G. Booch Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual 2004 Pearson Higher Education
11. A. Omerovic, and K. Stolen Interval-Based Uncertainty Handling in Model-Based Prediction of System Quality vol. 0 2010 IEEE Computer Society
12. T.D. Cook, and D.T. Campbell Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings 1979 Houghton Mifflin Company
13. W.R. Shadish, T.D. Cook, and D.T. Campbell Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference 2001 Houghton Mifflin Company
14. N. Fenton, and M. Neil A critique of software defect prediction models IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25 1999 675 689
15. M. Neil, N. Fenton, and L. Nielsen Building large-scale Bayesian networks Knowledge Engineering Review 15 2000 257 284
16. D. Heckerman, A. Mamdani, and M.P. Wellman Real-world applications of Bayesian networks ACM Communications 38 1995 24 26
17. A. Omerovic, and K. Stolen Simplifying parametrization of Bayesian networks in prediction of system quality Third IEEE International Conference on Secure Software Integration and Reliability Improvement 2009 IEEE 447 448
18. V.R. Basili, Software Modeling and Measurement: the Goal/Question/Metric Paradigm, Technical Report TR-92-96, University of Maryland, 1992.
19. V. Basili, G. Caldiera, and H. Rombach The goal question metric approach Encyclopedia of Software Engineering 1994
20. N.E. Fenton, and S.L. Pfleeger Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach 1998 PWS Publishing Co.
21. C. Ebert, R. Dumke, M. Bundschuh, A. Schmietendorf, and R. Dumke Best Practices in Software Measurement 2004 Springer Verlag
22. L. Dobrica, and E. NiemelS A survey on software architecture analysis methods IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28 2002 638 653
23. M. Mattsson, H. Grahn, F. Mårtensson, Software architecture evaluation methods for performance, maintainability, testability and portability, in: Second International Conference on the Quality of Software Architectures, 2006.
24. R. Kazman, M. Klein, M. Barbacci, T. Longstaff, H. Lipson, and J. Carriere The architecture tradeoff analysis method Fourth IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems 1998 IEEE
25. R. Kazman, M. Barbacci, M. Klein, S.J. Carriere, and S.G. Woods Experience with performing architecture tradeoff analysis International Conference on Software Engineering 0 1999 54
26. C. Byrnes, I. Kyratzoglou, Applying Architecture Tradeoff Assessment Method (ATAM) as Part of Formal Software Architecture Review, Technical Report 07-0094, The MITRE Corporation, 2007.
27. B. Flyvbjerg Five misunderstandings about case-study research Qualitative Inquiry 12 2006 219 245