Evaluation of experiences from applying the PREDIQT method in an industrial case study

Proceedings - 2011 5th International Conference on Secure Software Integration and Reliability Improvement, SSIRI 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 137-146

  Omerovic, Aida ^a,b   Solhaug, Bjørnar ^a   Stølen, Ketil ^a,b  

^a SINTEF ICT   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Change impact analysis; Modeling; Quality prediction; Simulation; System architectural design

Indexed keywords

CHANGE IMPACT ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL CASE STUDY; INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS; MODEL-BASED PREDICTION; QUALITY PREDICTION; SIMULATION; STRUCTURED EVALUATION; SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS; SYSTEM QUALITY; WORKING PROCESS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; EXPERT SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; INDUSTRY; MODELS; RESEARCH; SOFTWARE RELIABILITY;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 80052928418     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SSIRI.2011.20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. International Organisation for Standardisation: ISO/IEC 9126 - Software engineering - Product quality. 2004.
2. V. Basili, G. Caldiera, and H. Rombach. The Goal Question Metric Approach. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, 1994.
3. V. R. Basili. Software Modeling and Measurement: the Goal/Question/Metric Paradigm. Technical Report TR- 92-96, University of Maryland, 1992.
4. C. Byrnes and I. Kyratzoglou. Applying Architecture Tradeoff Assessment Method (ATAM) as Part of Formal Software Architecture Review. Technical Report 07- 0094, The MITRE Corporation, 2007.
5. L. Dobrica and E. Niemel. A Survey on Software Architecture Analysis Methods. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(7):638-653, 2002.
6. C. Ebert, R. Dumke, M. Bundschuh, A. Schmietendorf, and R. Dumke. Best Practices in Software Measurement. Springer Verlag, 2004.
7. N. Fenton and M. Neil. A Critique of Software Defect Prediction Models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25:675-689, 1999.
8. N. E. Fenton and S. L. Pfleeger. Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach. PWS Publishing Co., 1998.
9. D. Heckerman, A. Mamdani, and W. M. P. Real-World Applications of Bayesian Networks. ACM Communications, 38(3):24-26, 1995.
10. R. Kazman, M. Barbacci, M. Klein, S. J. Carriere, and S. G. Woods. Experience with Performing Architecture Tradeoff Analysis. International Conference on Software Engineering, 0:54, 1999.
11. R. Kazman, M. Klein, M. Barbacci, T. Longstaff, H. Lipson, and J. Carriere. The Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method. In Fourth IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, pages 68- 78, 1998.
12. M. Mattsson, H. Grahn, and F. Martensson. Software Architecture Evaluation Methods for Performance, Maintainability, Testability and Portability. In Second International Conference on the Quality of Software Architectures, June 2006.
13. M. Neil, N. Fenton, and L. Nielsen. Building Large- Scale Bayesian Networks. Knowledge Engineering Rev., 15(3):257-284, 2000.
14. A. Omerovic, A. Andresen, H. Grindheim, P. Myrseth, A. Refsdal, K. Stølen, and J. Ølnes. A Feasibility Study in Model Based Prediction of Impact of Changes on System Quality. Technical Report A13339, SINTEF, 2010.
15. A. Omerovic, A. Andresen, H. Grindheim, P. Myrseth, A. Refsdal, K. Stølen, and J. Ølnes. A Feasibility Study in Model Based Prediction of Impact of Changes on System Quality. In International Symposium on Engineering Secure Software and Systems, volume LNCS 5965, pages 231-240. Springer, 2010.
16. A. Omerovic, B. Solhaug, and K. Stølen. Evaluation of Experiences from Applying the PREDIQT Method in an Industrial Case Study. Technical Report A17562, SINTEF, 2011.
17. A. Omerovic and K. Stølen. Interval-Based Uncertainty Handling in Model-Based Prediction of System Quality. volume 0, pages 99-108. IEEE Computer Society, 2010.
18. R. K. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Third Edition, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol 5. Sage Publications, Inc, 3 edition, 2002.