The impact of voluntary audit on credit ratings: Evidence from UK private firms

Accounting and Business Research

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 397-418

  Dedman, Elisabeth ^a   Kausar, Asad ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

credit ratings; financial reporting quality; small companies; voluntary audit

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865769014     PISSN: 00014788     EISSN: 21594260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2012.653761     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allee, K.D. and Yohn, T.L., 2009. The demand for financial statements in an unregulated environment: an examination of the production and use of financial statements by privately held small businesses. Accounting review, 84, 1-25.
2. Ball, R. and Shivakumar, L., 2005. Earnings quality in U.K. private firms. Journal of accounting and economics, 39, 83-128.
3. Basu, S., 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of accounting and economics, 24, 3-37. (Pubitemid 127163476)
4. BERR, 2004. Final regulatory impact assessment on the audit exemption threshold: assessment of the regulatory impact of the increase in the audit exemption threshold [online]. Available from: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/ file16410.pdf [Accessed 9 December 2011]
5. Berry, A., Citron, D. and Jarvis, R., 1987. The information needs of bankers dealing with large and small companies. London: Certified Accountants Publications.
6. Blackwell, D., Noland, T. andWinters, D., 1998. The value of auditor assurance: evidence from loan pricing. Journal of accounting research, 36, 57-70.
7. Chow, C.W., 1982. The demand for external auditing: size, debt and ownership influences. Accounting review, 57, 272-291.
8. Clatworthy, M., Makepeace, G. and Peel, M., 2009. Selection bias and the Big Four premium: new evidence using Heckman and matching models. Accounting and business research, 39, 139-166.
9. Collis, J., 2003. Directors' Views on Exemption from Statutory Audit. URN 03/1342, October, London: DTI. Available from: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/ file25971.pdf [Accessed 9 December 2011]
10. Collis, J., 2010. 'Demand not command in financial reporting by small companies in the UK.' Working paper, University of Brunel.
11. Collis, J. and Jarvis, R., 2000. How owner-managers use accounts. Research monograph, London: ICAEW. Available from: http://www.icaew.com [Accessed 9 December 2011].
12. Collis, J., Jarvis, R. and Skerratt, L., 2004. The demand for the audit in small companies in the UK. Accounting and business research, 34, 87-100.
13. Davies, P., 2008. Gower and Davies: Principles of modern company law 8th ed. London: Thomson, Sweet and Maxwell.
14. Dechow, P. and Dichev, I., 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting review, 77 (supplement), 35-59. (Pubitemid 36208803)
15. Doumpos, M. and Pasiouras, F., 2005. Developing and testing models for replicating credit ratings: a multicriteria approach. Computational economics, 25, 327-341. (Pubitemid 41086510)
16. Fortin, S. and Pittman, J.A., 2007. The role of auditor choice in debt pricing in private firms. Contemporary accounting research, 24, 859-896.
17. Francis, J.R. and Yu, M., 2009. Big 4 office size and audit quality. Accounting review, 84, 1521-52.
18. Healy, P. and Wahlen, J., 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting horizons, 13, 365-383.
19. Heckman, J., 1979. The sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153-162.
20. ICAEW. 2009. Alternatives to audit: report on the ICAEW assurance service consultation.
21. Iwasaki, J., 2008. Responding to audit exemption: the UK experience. Accountant, Spring: 340.
22. Keasey, K., Watson, R. and Wynarczyk, P., 1988. The small company audit qualification: a preliminary investigation. Accounting and business research, 18, 323-333.
23. Kim, J-B., Simunic, D. Stein, M. and Yi, C.H., 2011. Voluntary audits and the cost of debt capital for privately held firms: Korean evidence. Contemporary accounting research, 28, 585-615.
24. Lennox, C., Francis, J.R. and Wang, Z. 2012. Selection models in accounting research. The accounting review. Accepted manuscript. doi: 10.2308/accr-10195.
25. Lennox, C. and Pittman, J., 2011. Voluntary Audits versus Mandatory Audits. Accounting review, 86, 1655-1678.
26. Lo, K., 2008. Earnings management and earnings quality. Journal of accounting and economics, 45, 350-357.
27. Marriott, N, Collis, J. and Marriott, P., 2006. Qualitative review of the accounting and auditing needs of small and medium-sized companies and their stakeholders. London: Professional Oversight Board. Available from: http://www.frc.org.uk/documents/pagemanager/poba/Case%20studies%20report.pdf [Accessed 15 December 2011].
28. Melumad, N. and Thoman, L., 1990. On auditors and the courts in an adverse selection setting. Journal of accounting research, 28, 77-120.
29. Nelson, W., Elliott, J. and Tarpley, R., 2002. Evidence from auditors about managers' and auditors' earnings management decisions. Accounting review, 77, 175-202. (Pubitemid 36208811)
30. Pittman, J. and Fortin, S., 2004. Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for newly public firms. Journal of accounting and economics, 37, 113-136. (Pubitemid 38254095)
31. Seow, J.-L., 2001. The demand for the UK small company audit: an agency perspective. International small business journal, 19, 61-79.
32. Sunder, S., 2003. Rethinking the structure of accounting and auditing. Yale ICF Working paper No. 03-17. Yale School of Management.
33. Watts, R., 2003a. Conservatism in Accounting Part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting horizons, 17, 207-221.
34. Watts, R., 2003b. Conservatism in Accounting Part II: evidence and research opportunities. Accounting horizons, 17, 287-301.
35. Watts, R. and Zimmerman, J., 1983. Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: some evidence. Journal of law and economics, 26, 613-634.
36. Zhang, Z., 2008. The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. Journal of accounting and economics, 45, 27-54.