Anatomy of maximal stop mixing in the MSSM

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2012, Issue 8, 2012, Pages

  Brümmer, Felix ^a   Kraml, Sabine ^b   Kulkarni, Suchita ^b  

^a DESY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER GRENOBLE 1   (France)

Author keywords

GUT; Higgs Physics; Supersymmetric Standard Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865767137     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2012)089     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Combined search for the standard model Higgs boson using up to 4:9 fb-1 of pp collision data at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 49 [arXiv:1202.1408] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Combined results of searches for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 26 [arXiv:1202.1488] [INSPIRE].
3. G. D'Agostini, Probably a discovery: bad mathematics means rough scientific communication, arXiv:1112.3620 [INSPIRE].
4. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept. 459 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503173] [INSPIRE].
5. L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, A natural SUSY Higgs near 126 GeV, JHEP 04 (2012) 131 [arXiv:1112.2703] [INSPIRE].
6. S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal and G. Weiglein, Interpreting the LHC Higgs search results in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 201 [arXiv:1112.3026] [INSPIRE].
7. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi and J. Quevillon, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 162 [arXiv:1112.3028] [INSPIRE].
8. - and dark matter direct detection, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1906 [arXiv:1112.3032] [INSPIRE].
9. P. Draper, P. Meade, M. Reece and D. Shih, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for the MSSM and low-scale SUSY breaking, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095007 [arXiv:1112.3068] [INSPIRE].
10. M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah and C.E. Wagner, A 125 GeV SM-like Higgs in the MSSM and the rate, JHEP 03 (2012) 014 [arXiv:1112.3336] [INSPIRE].
11. A. Arvanitaki and G. Villadoro, A non standard model Higgs at the LHC as a sign of naturalness, JHEP 02 (2012) 144 [arXiv:1112.4835] [INSPIRE].
12. J.-J. Cao, Z.-X. Heng, J.M. Yang, Y.-M. Zhang and J.-Y. Zhu, A SM-like Higgs near 125 GeV in low energy SUSY: a comparative study for MSSM and NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2012) 086 [arXiv:1202.5821] [INSPIRE].
13. N.D. Christensen, T. Han and S. Su, MSSM Higgs bosons at the LHC, arXiv:1203.3207 [INSPIRE].
14. U. Ellwanger, A Higgs boson near 125 GeV with enhanced di-photon signal in the NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2012) 044 [arXiv:1112.3548] [INSPIRE].
15. S. King, M. Muhlleitner and R. Nevzorov, NMSSM Higgs benchmarks near 125 GeV, Nucl. Phys. B 860 (2012) 207 [arXiv:1201.2671] [INSPIRE].
16. Z. Kang, J. Li and T. Li, On naturalness of the (N)MSSM, arXiv:1201.5305 [INSPIRE].
17. F. Boudjema and G.D. La Rochelle, BMSSM higgses at 125 GeV, arXiv:1203.3141 [INSPIRE].
18. D.A. Vasquez et al., The 125 GeV Higgs in the NMSSM in light of LHC results and astrophysics constraints, arXiv:1203.3446 [INSPIRE].
19. H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs scalar for LHC SUSY and neutralino dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1112.3017] [INSPIRE].
20. M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal, Implications of the 125 GeV Higgs boson for scalar dark matter and for the CMSSM phenomenology, JHEP 05 (2012) 061 [arXiv:1112.3647] [INSPIRE].
21. O. Buchmueller et al., Higgs and supersymmetry, arXiv:1112.3564 [INSPIRE].
22. J. Cao, Z. Heng, D. Li and J.M. Yang, Current experimental constraints on the lightest Higgs boson mass in the constrained MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 665 [arXiv:1112.4391] [INSPIRE].
23. L. Aparicio, D. Cerdeno and L. Ibáñez, A 119-125 GeV Higgs from a string derived slice of the CMSSM, JHEP 04 (2012) 126 [arXiv:1202.0822] [INSPIRE].
24. J. Ellis and K.A. Olive, Revisiting the Higgs mass and dark matter in the CMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2005 [arXiv:1202.3262] [INSPIRE].
25. H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Neutralino dark matter in mSUGRA/CMSSM with a 125 GeV light Higgs scalar, JHEP 05 (2012) 091 [arXiv:1202.4038] [INSPIRE].
26. T. Moroi, R. Sato and T.T. Yanagida, Extra matters decree the relatively heavy Higgs of mass about 125 GeV in the supersymmetric model, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 218 [arXiv:1112.3142] [INSPIRE].
27. J.F. Gunion, Y. Jiang and S. Kraml, The constrained NMSSM and Higgs near 125 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 454 [arXiv:1201.0982] [INSPIRE].
28. T.G. Rizzo, Gauge kinetic mixing in the E6SSM, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 055010 [arXiv:1201.2898] [INSPIRE].
29. C.-F. Chang, K. Cheung, Y.-C. Lin and T.-C. Yuan, Mimicking the standard model Higgs boson in UMSSM, JHEP 06 (2012) 128 [arXiv:1202.0054] [INSPIRE].
30. U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, Higgs bosons near 125 GeV in the NMSSM with constraints at the GUT scale, arXiv:1203.5048 [INSPIRE].
31. H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang and A. Mustafayev, Implications of a high mass light MSSM Higgs scalar for SUSY searches at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 091701 [arXiv:1109.3197] [INSPIRE].
32. S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, in Perspectives on supersymmetry II, G.L. Kane ed., World Scientific, Singapore (2010), hep-ph/9709356 [INSPIRE].
33. M.S. Carena et al., Reconciling the two loop diagrammatic and effective field theory computations of the mass of the lightest CP-even Higgs boson in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000) 29 [hep-ph/0001002] [INSPIRE].
34. S.P. Martin and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry breaking couplings, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2282 [Erratum ibid. D 78 (2008) 039903] [hep-ph/9311340] [INSPIRE].
35. H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang and X. Tata, Natural supersymmetry: LHC, dark matter and ILC searches, JHEP 05 (2012) 109 [arXiv:1203.5539] [INSPIRE].
36. S. Pokorski, Status of supersymmetry, talk at Implications of the early LHC for cosmology workshop, April 18-20, Hamburg, Germany (2012).
37. M. Badziak, E. Dudas, M. Olechowski and S. Pokorski, to appear.
38. R. Dermíšek and H.D. Kim, Radiatively generated maximal mixing scenario for the Higgs mass and the least fine tuned minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 211803 [hep-ph/0601036] [INSPIRE].
39. D.E. Kaplan, G.D. Kribs and M. Schmaltz, Supersymmetry breaking through transparent extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 035010 [hep-ph/9911293] [INSPIRE].
40. Z. Chacko, M.A. Luty, A.E. Nelson and E. Ponton, Gaugino mediated supersymmetry breaking, JHEP 01 (2000) 003 [hep-ph/9911323] [INSPIRE].
41. M. Schmaltz and W. Skiba, Minimal gaugino mediation, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 095005 [hep-ph/0001172] [INSPIRE].
42. C. Csáki, J. Erlich, C. Grojean and G.D. Kribs, 4D constructions of supersymmetric extra dimensions and gaugino mediation, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 015003 [hep-ph/0106044] [INSPIRE].
43. H. Cheng, D. Kaplan, M. Schmaltz and W. Skiba, Deconstructing gaugino mediation, Phys. Lett. B 515 (2001) 395 [hep-ph/0106098] [INSPIRE].
44. D. Green, A. Katz and Z. Komargodski, Direct gaugino mediation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 061801 [arXiv:1008.2215] [INSPIRE].
45. μ problem in gauge mediation, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 095008 [arXiv:0708.3593] [INSPIRE].
46. H. Murayama, Y. Nomura and D. Poland, More visible effects of the hidden sector, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 015005 [arXiv:0709.0775] [INSPIRE].
47. G. Perez, T.S. Roy and M. Schmaltz, Phenomenology of SUSY with scalar sequestering, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 095016 [arXiv:0811.3206] [INSPIRE].
48. N.J. Craig and D. Green, On the phenomenology of strongly coupled hidden sectors, JHEP 09 (2009) 113 [arXiv:0905.4088] [INSPIRE].
49. F. Brümmer, S. Fichet, S. Kraml and R.K. Singh, On SUSY GUTs with a degenerate Higgs mass matrix, JHEP 08 (2010) 096 [arXiv:1007.0321] [INSPIRE].
50. D. Martí and A. Pomarol, Supersymmetric theories with compact extra dimensions in N = 1 superfields, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 105025 [hep-th/0106256] [INSPIRE].
51. F. Brümmer, S. Fichet, A. Hebecker and S. Kraml, Phenomenology of supersymmetric gauge-Higgs unification, JHEP 08 (2009) 011 [arXiv:0906.2957] [INSPIRE].
52. P. Meade, N. Seiberg and D. Shih, General gauge mediation, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 177 (2009) 143 [arXiv:0801.3278] [INSPIRE].
53. μ problem of gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 111801 [arXiv:0809.4492] [INSPIRE].
54. A. De Simone, R. Franceschini, G.F. Giudice, D. Pappadopulo and R. Rattazzi, Lopsided gauge mediation, JHEP 05 (2011) 112 [arXiv:1103.6033] [INSPIRE].
55. Z. Komargodski and N. Seiberg, μ and general gauge mediation, JHEP 03 (2009) 072 [arXiv:0812.3900] [INSPIRE].
56. G. Hiller, Y. Hochberg and Y. Nir, Flavor changing processes in supersymmetric models with hybrid gauge- and gravity-mediation, JHEP 03 (2009) 115 [arXiv:0812.0511] [INSPIRE].
57. F. Brümmer and W. Buchmüller, Light higgsinos as heralds of higher-dimensional unification, JHEP 07 (2011) 010 [arXiv:1105.0802] [INSPIRE].
58. M.A. Ajaib, I. Gogoladze, F. Nasir and Q. Shafi, Revisiting mGMSB in light of a 125 GeV Higgs, arXiv:1204.2856 [INSPIRE].
59. B. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145] [INSPIRE].
60. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs: a program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 149 (2002) 103 [hep-ph/0112278] [INSPIRE].
61. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs: version 1.3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 174 (2006) 577 [hep-ph/0405253] [INSPIRE].
62. G. Bélanger et al., Indirect search for dark matter with MicrOMEGAs2.4, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 842 [arXiv:1004.1092] [INSPIRE].
63. MicrOmegas, http://lapth.in2p3.fr/micromegas/.
64. A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski and M. Spira, HDECAY: a program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension, Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 (1998) 56 [hep-ph/9704448] [INSPIRE].
65. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, D. Asner et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ -lepton properties, arXiv:1010.1589 [INSPIRE].
66. J.A. Hernando Morata, Rare decays in LHCb, talk presented at the 47th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, March 3-10, La Thuile, Italy (2012), LHCb-TALK-2012-028 (2012).
67. G. Degrassi, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, P. Slavich and G. Weiglein, Towards high precision predictions for the MSSM Higgs sector, Eur. Phys. J. C 28 (2003) 133 [hep-ph/0212020] [INSPIRE].
68. C.F. Berger, L. Covi, S. Kraml and F. Palorini, The number density of a charged relic, JCAP 10 (2008) 005 [arXiv:0807.0211] [INSPIRE].
69. A. Djouadi, Squark effects on Higgs boson production and decay at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 435 (1998) 101 [hep-ph/9806315] [INSPIRE].
70. ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in √s = 7TeV proton-proton collisions, talk presented at the 47th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, March 3-10, La Thuile, Italy (2012), ATLAS-CONF-2012-033 (2012).
71. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry with the razor variables at CMS, PAS-SUS-12-005 (2012).
72. H. Baer, V. Barger and P. Huang, Hidden SUSY at the LHC: the light higgsino-world scenario and the role of a lepton collider, JHEP 11 (2011) 031 [arXiv:1107.5581] [INSPIRE].
73. S. Bobrovskyi, F. Brümmer, W. Buchmüller and J. Hajer, Searching for light higgsinos with b-jets and missing leptons, JHEP 01 (2012) 122 [arXiv:1111.6005] [INSPIRE].
74. N. Arkani-Hamed and H. Murayama, Can the supersymmetric avor problem decouple?, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 6733 [hep-ph/9703259] [INSPIRE].
75. R. Barbieri and D. Pappadopulo, S-particles at their naturalness limits, JHEP 10 (2009) 061 [arXiv:0906.4546] [INSPIRE].
76. M. Papucci, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Natural SUSY endures, arXiv:1110.6926 [INSPIRE].
77. D.M. Ghilencea, H.M. Lee and M. Park, Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: a comparative analysis at two-loop level, JHEP 07 (2012) 046 [arXiv:1203.0569] [INSPIRE].
78. L.E. Ibáñez and C. López, N = 1 supergravity, the weak scale and the low-energy particle spectrum, Nucl. Phys. B 233 (1984) 511 [INSPIRE].
79. M.S. Carena, P.H. Chankowski, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski and C. Wagner, Bottom-up approach and supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 491 (1997) 103 [hep-ph/9612261] [INSPIRE].
80. R. Essig and J.-F. Fortin, The minimally tuned minimal supersymmetric standard model, JHEP 04 (2008) 073 [arXiv:0709.0980] [INSPIRE].
81. H. Abe, T. Kobayashi and Y. Omura, Relaxed fine-tuning in models with non-universal gaugino masses, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 015002 [hep-ph/0703044] [INSPIRE].
82. J.E. Younkin and S.P. Martin, Non-universal gaugino masses, the supersymmetric little hierarchy problem and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 055028 [arXiv:1201.2989] [INSPIRE].
83. R. Barbieri and G. Giudice, Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63 [INSPIRE].
84. J.M. Frère, D.R.T. Jones and S. Raby, Fermion masses and induction of the weak scale by supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 11 [INSPIRE].
85. J.P. Derendinger and C.A. Savoy, Quantum effects and SU(2) × U(1) breaking in supergravity gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 237 (1984) 307 [INSPIRE].
86. C. Kounnas, A. Lahanas, D.V. Nanopoulos and M. Quirós, Low-energy behavior of realistic locally supersymmetric grand unified theories, Nucl. Phys. B 236 (1984) 438 [INSPIRE].
87. J. Casas, A. Lleyda and C. Muñoz, Strong constraints on the parameter space of the MSSM from charge and color breaking minima, Nucl. Phys. B 471 (1996) 3 [hep-ph/9507294] [INSPIRE].