Independent legal representation for complainants in rape trials

Rethinking Rape Law: International and Comparative Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 267-280

  Raitt, Fiona E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865724289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Adler, Z. (1987) Rape on Trial, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2. Ashworth, A. (1986) 'Punishment and compensation: victims, offenders and the state', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 6: 86-122.
3. Bacik, I., Maunsell, C. and Gogan, S. (1998) The Legal Process and Victims of Rape, Dublin: Dublin Rape Crisis Centre and School of Law, Trinity College, Dublin.
4. Beloof, D. (1999) 'The third model of criminal process: the victim participation model', Utah Law Review, 289-330.
5. Brienen, M.E.I. and Hoegen, E.H. (2000) Victims of Crime in 22 European Criminal Justice Systems: the implementation of Recommendation (85) 11 of the Council of Europe on the position of the victim in the framework of criminal law and procedure, Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Productions.
6. Brown, B., Burman, M. and Jamieson, L. (1992) Sexual History and Sexual Character Evidence in Scottish Sexual Offence Trials, Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit.
7. Burman, M., Jamieson, L., Nicholson, J. and Brooks, O. (2007) Impact of Aspects of the Law of Evidence in Sexual Offence Trials: an evaluation study, Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research.
8. Cameron, J. (2003) Victim Privacy and the Open Court Principle, Ottawa, Canada: Department of Justice.
9. Chambers, G. and Millar, A. (1983) Investigating Sexual Assault, Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit.
10. Chambers, G. and Millar, A. (1986) Prosecuting Sexual Assault, Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit.
11. Chase, O. (1997) 'Legal processes and national culture', Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 1: 1-39.
12. Conaghan, J. (2005) 'Extending the reach of human rights to encompass victims of rape', Feminist Legal Studies, 13: 134-57.
13. Crown Office (2006) Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service Review, Edinburgh: Crown Office.
14. Cunliffe, E. (2006) 'Without Fear or Favour? Trends and possibilities in the Canadian approach to expert human behaviour evidence', International Journal of Evidence & Proof 10: 280-315.
15. de Than, C. (2003) 'Positive obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights: towards the human rights of victims and vulnerable witnesses?', Journal of Criminal Law, 67: 165-82.
16. Doak, J. (2005) 'Victims rights in criminal trials: prospects for participation', Journal of Law & Society, 32(2): 294-316.
17. Doak, J. (2008) Victims' Rights, Human Rights and Criminal Justice, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
18. Ehrlich, S. (2001) Representing Rape: language and sexual consent, London: Routledge.
19. Ellison, L. (2005) 'Closing the credibility gap: the prosecutorial use of expert witness testimony in sexual assault cases', International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 9(4): 239-68.
20. Ellison, L. (2007) 'Promoting effective case-building in rape cases: a comparative perspective', Criminal Law Review, 691-708.
21. Estrich, S. (1987) Real Rape, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Garkawe, S. (1994) 'The role of the victim during criminal proceedings', University of New South Wales Law Journal, 17: 595-616.
23. Gotell, L. (2001) 'Colonization through disclosure: confidential records, sexual assault complainants and Canadian law', Social and Legal Studies, 10: 315-46.
24. Gotell, L. (2008) 'Tracking decisions on access to sexual assault complainants' confidential records: the continued permeability of subsections 278.1-278.9 of the Criminal Code', Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 20: 111-54.
25. Greenspan, E. (2001) 'The new truth: victims never lie', Supreme Court Law Review, 14: 89-95.
26. Home Office (2002) Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings, London: Home Office.
27. Jackson, J. and Hancock, B. (2006) Standards for Prosecutors, An Analysis of the United National Prosecuting Agencies, Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Productions.
28. Jung, H. (2004) 'Nothing but the truth? Some facts, impressions and confessions about truth in criminal procedure', in A. Duff, L. Farmer, S. Marshall and V. Tadros (eds) The Trial on Trial, vol. 1, Truth and Due Process, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 147-56.
29. Karmen, A. (1990) Crime Victims: an introduction to victimology, 2nd edn, Florence, KY: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
30. Karmen, A. (1992) 'Who's against victims rights?', St John's Journal of Legal Commentary, 8: 157-75.
31. Kelly, L., Lovett, J. and Regan, L. (2005) A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases, London: Home Office Research Study 293.
32. Klug, F. (2004) 'Human rights and victims', in E. Cape (ed.) Reconcilable rights? Analysing the tensions between victims and defendants, London: Legal Action Group.
33. Londono, P. (2007) 'Positive obligations, criminal procedure and rape cases', European Human Rights Law Review, 2: 158-71.
34. McDonald, S. and Wobick, A. (2004) Bill C-46: Records Applications Post-Mills, A Caselaw Review, Ottawa, Canada: Department of Justice.
35. McEwan, J. (1998) Evidence and the Adversarial Process, 2nd edn, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
36. Marshall, G. (1984) Constitutional Conventions: the rules and forms of political accountability, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Matoesian, G. (1993) Reproducing Rape - Domination through talk in the courtroom, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
38. Mohr, R. (2002) Words are not Enough, Ottawa, Canada: Department of Justice.
39. Mosteller, R. (1999) 'The unnecessary victims rights amendments', Utah Law Review, 443-7.
40. Pizzi, W. (1996) 'Crime victims in German courtrooms: a comparative perspective on American problems', Stanford Journal of International Law, 32: 37-64.
41. Pizzi, W. (1999) 'Victims' rights: rethinking our "adversary system"', Utah Law Review, 349-68.
42. Raitt, F. (forthcoming) Independent Legal Representation for Complainers in Sexual Offence Trials, Glasgow: Rape Crisis Scotland.
43. Regan, L. and Kelly, L. (2003) Rape: still a forgotten issue, London: London Metropolitan University, Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit.
44. Roberts, J. and Benjamin, C. (1998) Prevalence of Sexual Assault and Therapeutic Records: research findings, Ottawa, Canada: Department of Justice.
45. Sebold, A. (1999) Lucky, New York: Scribner.
46. Spohn, C. and Horney, J. (1992) Rape law reform: a grassroots revolution and its impact, New York: Plenum.
47. Strandbakken, A. (2003) 'A fair trial for the suspect?', in Criminal Justice between Crime Control and Due Process, Colloquium Proceedings, Freiburg: Max Planck Institute, 241-51.
48. Temkin, J. (2002a) Rape and the Legal Process, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Warren, G. (2003) 'Due process - prosecutorial implications of a victim's right to be heard', Rutgers Law Journal, 34: 1173-88.
50. Wilson, L. (2005) 'Independent legal representation for victims of sexual assault: a model for delivery of legal services', Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 23: 249-312.
51. Young, A. (2005) 'Crime victims and constitutional rights', Criminal Law Quarterly, 49: 432-71.