Supercolonies of billions in an invasive ant: What is a society?

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 925-933

  Moffett, Mark W ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Argentine ant; polydomy; recognition system; reproductive isolation; society; speciation; supercolony; unicolonial

Indexed keywords

ANT; COLONY STRUCTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; GENETIC DRIFT; GROUP SIZE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INVASIVE SPECIES; NESTING BEHAVIOR; NESTMATE RECOGNITION; PATCHINESS; QUEEN; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); WORKER CASTE;

FORMICIDAE; ISOPTERA; LINEPITHEMA HUMILE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84865720835     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ars043     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Björkman-Chiswell BT, van Wilgenburg E, Thomas ML, Swearer SE, Elgar MA. 2008. Absence of aggression but not nestmate recognition in an Australian population of the Argentine ant Linepithema humile. Insectes Soc. 55:207-212.
2. Blight O, Renucci M, Tirard A, Orgeas J, Provost E. 2010. A new colony structure of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) in Southern Europe. Biol Invasions. 12:1491-1497.
3. Brandt M, van Wilgenburg E, Sulc R, Shea KJ, Tsutsui ND. 2009. The scent of supercolonies: the discovery, synthesis and behavioural verification of ant colony recognition cues. BMC Biol. 7:71.
4. Buczkowski G, Bennett GW. 2006. Dispersed central-place foraging in the polydomous odorous house ant, Tapinoma sessile as revealed by a protein maker. Insect Soc. 53:282-290.
5. Buczkowski G, Bennett G. 2009. Colony budding and its effects on food allocation in the highly polygynous ant, Monomorium pharaonis. Ethology. 115:1091-1099.
6. Buczkowski G, Vargo EL, Silverman J. 2004. The diminutive supercolony: the Argentine ants of the southeastern United States. Mol Ecol. 13:2235-2242.
7. Burda H. 1995. Individual recognition and incest avoidance in eusocial common mole-rats rather than reproductive suppression by parents. Cell Mol Life Sci. 51:411-413.
8. Chapman RE, Bourke AFG. 2001. The influence of sociality on the conservation biology of social insects. Ecol Lett. 4:650-662.
9. Corin SE, Abbott KL, Richie PA, Lester PJ. 2007. Large scale unicoloniality: the population and colony structure of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) in New Zealand. Insectes Soc. 54:275-282.
10. Crozier RH, Dix MW. 1979. Analysis of two genetic models for the innate components of colony odor in social Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 4:271-1224.
11. Debout G, Schatz B, Elias M, Mckey D. 2007. Polydomy in ants: what we know, what we think we know, and what remains to be done. Biol J Linn Soc. 90:319-348.
12. d'Ettorre P. 2008. Multiple levels of recognition in ants: a feature of complex societies. Biol Theory. 3:108-113.
13. d'Ettorre P, Lenoir A. 2010. Nestmate recognition. In: Lach L, Parr CL, Abbott KL, editors. Ant ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 194-209.
14. Drescher J, Blüthgen N, Schmitt T, Bühler J, Feldhaar H. 2010. Societies drifting apart? Behavioural, genetic and chemical differentiation between supercolonies in the yellow crazy ant Anoplolepis gracilipes. PLoS One. 5:e13581.
15. Fernàndez-Busquets X, Burger MM. 2003. Circular proteoglycans from sponges: first members of the spongican family. Cell Mol Life Sci. 60:88-112.
16. Franks NR, Partridge LW. 1993. Lanchester battles and the evolution of combat in ants. Anim Behav. 45:197-199.
17. Fresneau D. 1985. Individual foraging and path fidelity in a ponerine ant. Insectes Soc. 32:109-116.
18. Gardner A, West SA. 2006. Demography, altruism, and the benefits of budding. J Evol Biol. 19:1707-1716.
19. Giraud T, Pedersen JS, Keller L. 2002. Evolution of supercolonies: the Argentine ants of southern Europe. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 99:6075-6079.
20. Gordon DM. 2010a. Ant encounters: interaction networks and colony behavior. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
21. Gordon DM. 2010b. Colonial Studies. Boston Rev. 35:59-62.
22. Helanterä H, Strassmann JE, Carrillo J, Queller DC. 2009. Unicolonial ants: where do they come from, what are they and where are they going? Trends Ecol Evol. 24:341-349.
23. Heller NE. 2004. Colony structure in introduced and native populations of the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Insectes Soc. 51:378-386.
24. Heller NE, Gordon DM. 2006. Seasonal spatial dynamics and causes of nest movement in colonies of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Ecol Entomol. 31:499-510.
25. Heller NE, Ingram KK, Gordon DM. 2008. Nest connectivity and colony structure in unicolonial Argentine ants. Insectes Soc. 55:397-403.
26. Heller NE, Sanders NJ, Gordon DM. 2006. Linking temporal and spatial scales in the study of an Argentine ant invasion. Biol Invasions. 8:501-507.
27. Heller NE, Sanders NJ, Shors JW, Gordon DM. 2008. Rainfall facilitates the spread, and time alters the impact, of the invasive Argentine ant. Oecologia. 155:385-395.
28. Hölldobler B. 1983. Territorial behavior in the green tree ant (Oecophylla smaragdina). Biotropica. 15:241-250.
29. Hölldobler B, Carlin NF. 1987. Anonymity and specificity in the chemical communication signals of social insects. J Comp Physiol A. 161:567-581.
30. Hölldobler B, Lumsden CJ. 1980. Territorial strategies in ants. Science. 210:732-739.
31. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. 1977. The number of queens: an important trait in ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften. 64:8-15.
32. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. 1990. The ants. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
33. Hölldobler B,Wilson EO. 2008. The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. New York: WW Norton Co.
34. Holway DA, Case TJ. 2000. Mechanisms of dispersed central-place foraging in polydomous colonies of the Argentine ant. Anim Behav. 59:433-441.
35. Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Case TJ. 2002. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 33:181-233.
36. Holway DA, Suarez AV, Case TJ. 1998. Loss of intraspecific aggression in the success of a widespread invasive social insect. Science. 282:949-952.
37. Ingram KK, Gordon DM. 2003. Genetic analysis of dispersal dynamics in an invading population of Argentine ants. Ecology. 84: 2832-2842.
38. Jacobs DS, Kulper S. 2000. Individual recognition in the Damaraland mole-rat, Cryptomys damarensis. J Zool. 251:411-415.
39. Jaquiéry J, Vogel V, Keller L. 2005. Multilevel genetic analysis of two European supercolonies of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Mol Ecol. 14:589-598.
40. Keller L, Passera L, Suzzoni J-P. 1989. Queen execution in the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis. Physiol Entomol. 14:157-163.
41. Kohler M, Wehner R. 2005. Idiosyncratic route-based memories in desert ants, Melophorus bagoti: how do they interact with pathintegration vectors? Neurobiol Learn Mem. 83:1-12.
42. Lacey EA, Sherman PW. 1997. Cooperative breeding in naked mole-rats: implications for vertebrate and invertebrate sociality. In: Solomon NG, French JA, editors. Cooperative breeding in mammals. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 267-301.
43. LeBrun EG, Tillberg CV, Suarez AV, Folgarait PJ, Smith CR, Holway DA. 2007. An experimental study of competition between fire ants and Argentine ants in their native range. Ecology. 88:63-75.
44. Leroux JM. 1982. Ecologie des populations de dorylines Anomma nigricans dans la Région de Lamto (Cote d'Ivoire). Paris: Ecole Normale Supérieure, Publications du Laboratoire de Zoologie No. 22.
45. Liang D, Silverman J. 2000. "You are what you eat": diet modifies cuticular hydrocarbons and nestmate recognition in the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Naturwissenschaften. 87:412-416.
46. Linsenmair KE. 1985. Individual and family recognition in subsocial arthropods, in particular in the desert isopod Hemilepistus reaumuri. Forts Zool. 31:411-436.
47. Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M. 2004. 100 of the world's worst invasive alien species: A selection from the Global Invasive Species Database [Internet]. Gland (Switzerland): Invasive Species Specialist Group. Available from: http://www.issg.org/database.
48. Markin GP. 1968. Nest relationships of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis. J Kans Entomol Soc. 41:511-516.
49. Markin GP. 1970. The seasonal life cycle of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in southern California. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 63:1238-1242.
50. McGlynn TP. 1999. Non-native ants are smaller than related native ants. Am Nat. 154:690-699.
51. Menke SB, Holway DA. 2006. Abiotic factors control invasion by Argentine ants at the community scale. J Anim Ecol. 75:368-376.
52. Moffett MW. 2010. Adventures among ants. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
53. Newell W, Barber TC. 1913. Argentine ant. USDA Bureau Entomol Bull. 122:1-98.
54. O'Riain MJ, Jarvis JUM. 1997. Colony member recognition and xenophobia in the naked mole-rat. Anim Behav. 53:487-498.
55. Pedersen JS, Krieger MJB, Vogel V, Giraud T, Keller L. 2006. Native supercolonies of unrelated individuals in the invasive Argentine ant. Evolution. 60:782-791.
56. Peeters C, Liebig J. 2009. Fertility signaling as a general mechanism of regulating reproductive division of labor in ants. In: Gadau J, Fewell J, editors. Organization of insect societies: from genome to socio-complexity. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. p. 220-242.
57. Queller DC. 2000. Pax Argentinica. Nature. 405:519-520.
58. Queller DC, Strassmann JE. 1998. Kin selection and social insects. BioScience. 48:165-175.
59. Rosengren R, Fortelius W. 1986. Ortstreue in foraging ants of the Formica rufa group: hierarchy of orienting cues and long-term memory. Insectes Soc. 33:306-337.
60. Rosengren R, Pamilo P. 1983. The evolution of polygyny and polydomy in mound-building Formica ants. Acta Entomol Fenn. 42:65-77.
61. Schwartz M. 2004. Scientists question reports of massive ant supercolonies in California and Europe. Stanford Rep. 36:10.
62. Steiner F, Crozier RH, Schlick-Steiner BC. 2010. Colony structure. In: Lach L, Parr CL, Abbott KL, editors. Ant ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 177-193.
63. Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ. 2001. Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: insights from Argentine ants. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 98:1095-1100.
64. Suarez AV, Holway DA, Liang D, Tsutsui ND, Case TJ. 2002. Spatiotemporal patterns of intraspecific aggression in the invasive Argentine ant. Anim Behav. 64:697-708.
65. Suarez AV, Holway DA, Tsutsui ND. 2008. Genetics and behavior of a colonizing species: the invasive Argentine ant. Am Nat. 172:S72-S84.
66. Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Holway DA, Case TJ. 1999. Behavioral and genetic differentiation between native and introduced populations of the Argentine ant. Biol Invasions. 1:43-53.
67. Sunamura E, Hoshizaki S, Sakamoto H, Fujii T, Nishisue K, Suzuki S, Terayama M, Ishikawa Y, Tatsuki S. 2011. Workers select mates for queens: a possible mechanism of gene flow restriction between supercolonies of the invasive Argentine ant. Naturwissenschaften. 98:361-368.
68. Thomas ML, Payne-Makrisâ CM, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Holway DA. 2006. When supercolonies collide: territorial aggression in an invasive and unicolonial social insect. Mol Ecol. 15:4303-4315.
69. Thomas ML, Payne-Makrisâ CM, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Holway DA. 2007. Contact between supercolonies elevates aggression in Argentine ants. Insectes Soc. 54:225-233.
70. Tibbets EA, Dale J. 2007. Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends Ecol Evol. 22:529-537.
71. Torres CW, Brandt M, Tsutsui ND. 2007. The role of cuticular hydrocarbons as chemical cues for nestmate recognition in the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Insectes Soc. 54: 363-373.
72. Traniello JFA, Fourcassié V, Graham TP. 1991. Search behavior and foraging ecology of the ant Formica schaufussi: colony-level and individual patterns. Ethol Ecol Evol. 3:35-47.
73. Traniello JFA, Levings SC. 1986. Intra-and intercolony patterns of nest dispersion in the ant Lasius neoniger: correlations with territoriality and foraging ecology. Oecologia. 69:413-419.
74. Tsuji K. 2010. What brings peace to the world of ants? Myrmecol News. 13:131-132.
75. Tsutsui ND. 2004. Scents of self: the expression component of self/nonself recognition systems. Annales Zool Fenn. 41:713-727.
76. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Grosberg RK. 2003. Genetic diversity, asymmetrical aggression, and recognition in a widespread invasive species. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 100:1078-1083.
77. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ. 2000. Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 97:5948-5953.
78. Vogel V, Pedersen JS, D'Ettorre P, Lehmann L, Keller L. 2009. Dynamics and genetic structure of Argentine ant supercolonies in their native range. Evolution. 63:1627-1639.
79. Vogel V, Pedersen JS, Giraud T, Krieger MJB, Keller L. 2010. The worldwide expansion of the Argentine ant. Divers Distrib. 16: 170-186.
80. Whitehouse MEA, Jaffe K. 1996. Ant wars: combat strategies, territory and nest defense in the leaf-cutting ant Atta laevigata. Anim Behav. 51:1207-1217.
81. Wild AL. 2004. Taxonomy and distribution of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 97:1204-1215.
82. van Wilgenburg E, Torres CW, Tsutsui NM. 2010. The global expansion of a single ant supercolony. Evol Appl. 3:136-143.
83. Wilson EO. 1975. Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
84. Wyatt TD. 2010. Pheromones and signature mixtures: defining species-wide signals and variable cues for identity in both invertebrates and vertebrates. J Comp Physiol A. 196:685-700.