Examining digital literacy practices on social network sites

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 9-38

  Buck, Amber ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865690953     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/ building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 259-264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Arola, K. (2010). The design of Web 2.0: The rise of the template, the fall of design. Computers and Composition, 27, 4-14.
3. Bizzell, P. (1994). "Contact zones" and English studies. College English, 56, 163-169.
4. Boyd, D. (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California-Berkeley. Available from http://www.danah.org/papers/
5. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), Article 11. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison .html
6. Brandt, D. (2001). Literacy in American lives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Brooke, C. (2009). Lingua fracta: Towards a rhetoric of new media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
8. Bruffee, K. (1984). Collaborative learning and the "conversation of mankind." College English, 46, 635-652.
9. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
10. Cooper, M. (1986). The ecology of writing. College English, 48, 364-375.
11. DeVoss, D. N., McKee, H. A., & Selfe, R. (Eds.). (2009). Technological ecologies and sustainability. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. Retrieved from http:// ccdigitalpress.org/ebooks-and-projects/tes
12. Ellison, N., Lampe, C., Steinfeld, C., & Vitak, J. (2010). With a little help from my friends: How social network sites affect social capital processes. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 124-145). New York: Routledge.
13. Fleckenstein, K. S., Spinuzzi, C., Rickly, R. J., & Papper, C. C. (2008). The importance of harmony: An ecological metaphor for writing research. College Composition and Communication, 60, 388-419.
14. Fletcher, D. (2010, May 20). How Facebook is redefining privacy. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ article/0,9171,1990798,00.html
15. Geisler, C., & Sla ttery, S. (2007). Capturing the activity of digital writing: Using, analyzing, and supplementing video screen capture. In H. McKee & D. N. DeVoss (Eds.), Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues (pp. 185-200). New York: Hampton Press.
16. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
17. Grabill, J., Hart-Davidson, W., Pigg, S., McLeod, M., Curran, P., Moore, J., Brunk- Chavez, B. (2010). Revisualizing composition: Mapping the writing lives of first-year college students [White paper]. Retrieved from the WIDE Research Center, http://wide.msu.edu/special/writinglives/
18. Hart-Davidson, B. (2007). Studying the mediated action of composing with time-use diaries. In H. McKee & D. N. DeVoss (Eds.), Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues (pp. 153-170). New York: Hampton Press.
19. Johnson-Eilola, J. (2005). Datacloud: Toward a new theory of online work. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
20. Kirkland, D. (2010). 4 colored girls who considered suicide / when social networking was enuf: A black feminist perspective on literacy online. In D.E. Albermann (Ed.), Adolescents' online literacies: Connecting classrooms, digital media, & popular culture (pp. 71-89). New York: Peter Lang.
21. Kirkpatrick, M. (2010, January 18). The Facebook privacy debate: What you need to know. Retrieved from http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook- privacy-explanation-debate.php
22. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (Eds.). (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies, and practices. London: Peter Lang.
23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010, February 3). Social media and young adults. Retrieved from the Pew Internet & American Life Project, http:// www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/ Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx
25. Lunsford, A. A., Stapleton, L., Fishman, J., Krampetz, E., Rogers, P. M., Diogenes, M., & Otuteye, M. (2008). The Stanford study of writing. Retrieved from http://ssw.stanford.edu/index.php
26. Madden, M. (2012, February 24). Privacy management on social media sites. Retrieved from the Pew Internet & American Life Project, http://www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/2012/Privacy-management-onsocial- media.aspx
27. Madden, M., & Smith, A. (2010, May 26). Reputation management and social media. Retrieved from the Pew Internet & American Life Project, http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Reputation-Management.aspx
28. Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society, 13, 96-113.
29. McKee, H. (2011). Policy matters now and in the future: Net neutrality, corporate data mining, and government surveillance. Computers & Composition, 28, 276-291.
30. Milian, M. (2010, December 15). Artists reimagine Facebook's new profile pages. CNN. Retrieved from http://articles.cnn.com/ 2010-12-15/tech/facebook. profile.art-1- privacy-settings-facebook-profiles-profilephoto?- s=PM:TECH
31. Nakamura, L. (2002). Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the Internet. New York: Routledge.
32. Nardi, B. A., & O'Day, V. L. (2000). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Boston: MIT Press.
33. The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
34. Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T., (Eds.). (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Porter, J. (2007). Foreward. In H. McKee & D. N. DeVoss (Eds.), Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues (pp. ix-xix). New York: Hampton Press.
36. Prior, P., & Hengst, J. (2010). Introduction: Exploring semiotic remediation. In P. Prior & J. Hengst (Eds.), Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice (pp. 1-23). New York: Palgrave.
37. Prior, P., & Shipka, J. (2003). Chronotopic lamination: Tracing the contours of literate activity. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives. Retrieved from http:// wac.colostate.edu/books/selves-societies/ prior/
38. Sanderson, J. (2008). The blog is serving its purpose: Self-presentation strategies on 38pitches.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 912-936.
39. Schulman, A., & Joost, H. (Directors). (2010). Catfish [Motion picture]. United States: Rogue Pictures/Relativity Media.
40. Schwartz, R. (2010, December 14). 2010 a record breaking year for domains and social media. Retrieved from http://www.ricksblog .com/my-weblog/2010/12/ 2010-a-recordbreaking- year-for-domains-and-sales.html
41. Selfe, C. L., & Haw isher, G. E. (2004). Literate lives in the information age: Narratives of literacy from the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Sheridan, D., Street, B. V., & Bloome, D. (2000). Writing ourselves: Mass-observation and literacy practices. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
43. Sheridan-Rabideau, M. P. (2008). Girls, feminism, and grassroots literacies: Activism in the GirlZone. New York: SUNY.
44. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
45. Williams, B. (2009). Shimmering literacies: Popular culture and reading and writing online. New York: Peter Lang.
46. Wysocki, A. F., & Johnson-Eilola, J. (1999). Blinded by the letter: Why are we using literacy as a metaphor for everything else? In G. E. Hawisher & C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies (pp. 349-368). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.