Flowering phenology and mimicry of the rattan Calamus castaneus (Arecaceae) in Southern Thailand

Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 856-865

  Kidyoo, Aroonrat Meekijjaroenroj ^a,b   McKey, Doyle ^a  

^a CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^b The Royal Initiative of HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Arecaceae (palmae); Calamus castaneus; Dioecious rattan; Floral biology; Flowering phenology; Mimicry

Indexed keywords

EVERGREEN TREE; FLOWER VISITING; FLOWERING; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; MIMICRY; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOLOGY; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLINATION;

THAILAND;

ARECACEAE; CALAMUS (ANGIOSPERM); CALAMUS CASTANEUS; CALAMUS ROTANG; HEXAPODA;

EID: 84865688611     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/b2012-058     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abe, T. 2001. Flowering phenology, display size, and fruit set in an understory dioecious shrub, Aucuba japonica (Cornaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88(3): 455-461. doi:10.2307/2657110.
2. Ågren, J., and Schemske, D.W. 1991. Pollination by deceit in a neotropical monoecious herb, Begonia involucrata. Biotropica, 23(3): 235-241. doi:10.2307/2388200.
3. Ågren, J., Elmqvist, T., and Tunlid, A. 1986. Pollination by deceit, floral sex ratios and seed set in dioecious Rubus chamaemorus L. Oecologia (Berl.), 70(3): 332-338. doi:10.1007/BF00379493.
4. Alloysius, D. 1997. Reproductive biology of rattans. In Rattan - taxonomy, ecology, silviculture, conservation, genetic improve-ment and biotechnology. Proceedings of Training Courses cum Workshops, Sarawak, Sabah, 14-26 April 1996. Edited by A. N. Rao and V.R. Rao. IPGRI-APO, Serdang, Malaysia. pp. 137-144.
5. Armstrong, J.E. 1997. Pollination by deceit in nutmeg (Myristica insipida, Myristicaceae): floral displays and beetle activity at male and female trees. Am. J. Bot. 84(9): 1266-1274. doi:10.2307/ 2446051.
6. Ashman, T.L. 2009. Sniffing out patterns of sexual dimorphism in floral scent. Funct. Ecol. 23(5): 852-862. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01590.x.
7. Ashman, T.L., and Diefenderfer, C. 2001. Sex ratio represents a unique context for selection on attractive traits: consequences for the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Am. Nat. 157(3): 334-347. doi:10.1086/319192.
8. Barrett, S.C.H. 1998. The evolution of mating strategies in flowering plants. Trends Plant Sci. 3(9): 335-341. doi:10.1016/S1360-1385 (98)01299-0.
9. Bawa, K.S. 1980. Mimicry of male by female flowers and intrasexual competition for polliators in Jacaratia dolichaula (D. Smith) Woodson (Caricaceae). Evolution, 34(3): 467-474. doi:10.2307/2408216.
10. Bawa, K.S. 1990. Plant-pollinator interactions in tropical rain forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21(1): 399-422. doi:10.1146/annurev.es. 21.110190.002151.
11. Bernal, R., and Ervik, F. 1996. Floral biology and pollination of the dioecious palm Phytelephas seemannii in Colombia: an adaptation to staphylinid beetles. Biotropica, 28(4 4b): 682-696. doi:10.2307/2389054.
12. Bøgh, A. 1996. The reproductive phenology and pollination biology of fourCalamus(Arecaceae)speciesin Thailand.Principes,40(1):5-15.
13. Brown, A.O., and McNeil, J.N. 2006. Fruit production in cranberry (Ericaceae: Vaccinium macrocarpon): A bet-hedging strategy to optimize reproductive effort. Am. J. Bot. 93(6): 910-916. doi:10.3732/ajb.93.6.910.
14. Brunet, J., and Charlesworth, D. 1995. Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants. Evolution, 49(1): 70-79. doi:10. 2307/2410293.
15. Charlesworth, D. 1999. Theories on the evolution of dioecy. In Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Edited by M. A. Geber, T.E. Dawson, and L.F. Delph. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. pp. 33-60.
16. Dicks, L.V., Corbet, S.A., and Pywell, R.F. 2002. Compartmentaliza- tion in plant-insect flower visitor webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 71(1): 32-43. doi:10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00572.x.
17. Dobson, H.E.M. 1994. Floral volatiles in insect biology. In Insect- plant interactions. Edited by E.A. Bernays. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., USA. pp. 48-81.
18. Dransfield, J. 1979. A manual of the rattans of the Malay Peninsula. Malayan Forest Records. Forest Department, Ministry of Primary Industries, Malaysia. No.29.
19. Dufaÿ, M. 2010. Impact of plant flowering phenology on the cost / benefit balance in a nursery pollination mutualism, with honest males and cheating females. J. Evol. Biol. 23(5): 977-986. doi:10. 1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01968.x.
20. Dufaÿ, M., and Anstett, M.C. 2004. Cheating is not always punished: killer female plants and pollination by deceit in the dwarf palm Chamaerops humilis. J. Evol. Biol. 17(4): 862-868. doi:10.1111/j. 1420-9101.2004.00714.x.
21. Eckhart, V.M. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflores- cences. In Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Edited by M.A. Geber, T.E. Dawson, and L.F. Delph. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Germany. pp. 123-148.
22. Ehrlén, J. 1992. Proximate limits to seed production in a herbaceous perennial legume, Lathyrus vernus. Ecology, 73(5): 1820-1831. doi:10.2307/1940033.
23. Emlen, S.T., and Oring, L.W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197(4300): 215-223. doi:10.1126/science.327542.
24. Fægri, K., and van der Pijl, L. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, New York.
25. Forfang, A.S., and Olesen, J.M. 1998. Male-biased sex ratio and promiscuous pollination in the dioecious island tree Laurus azorica (Lauraceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 212(3-4): 143-157. doi:10.1007/BF01089736.
26. Gaskett, A.C. 2011. Orhid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 86(1): 33-75. doi:10. 1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00134.x.
27. Guitian, J. 1994. Selective fruit abortion in Prunus mahaleb (Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 81(12): 1555-1558. doi:10.2307/2445332.
28. Guitián, P., Medrano, M., and Rodríguez, M. 1997. Reproductive biology of Corema album (L.) D. Don (Empetraceae) in the northwest Iberian Peninsula. Acta Bot. Gallica, 144(1): 119-128.
29. Henderson, A., Fischer, B., Scariot, A., Pacheco, M.A.W., and Pardini, R. 2000. Flowering phenology of a palm community in a central Amazon forest. Brittonia, 52(2): 149-159. doi:10.2307/2666506.
30. Hossaert-McKey, M., Soler, C., Schatz, B., and Proffit, M. 2010. Floral scents: their roles in nursery pollination mutualisms. Chemoecology, 20(2): 75-88. doi:10.1007/s00049-010-0043-5.
31. Jarernrattawong, J. 1997. Rattan in Thailand. In Rattan - taxonomy, ecology, silviculture, conservation, genetic improvement and biotechnology. Proceedings of Training Courses cum Workshops, 14-26 April 1996, Sarawak, Sabah. Edited by A.N. Rao and V.R. Rao. IPGRI-APO, Serdang, Malaysia. pp. 115-116.
32. Johnson, S.D., and Steiner, K.E. 2000. Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15(4): 140-143. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01811-X.
33. Kadereit, J.W. 2004. Flowering Plants, Dicotyledons: Lamiales (except Acanthaceae including Avicenniaceae). Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg.
34. Kang, M.Z., Yang, L.L., Zhang, B.G., and de Reffye, P. 2011. Correlation between dynamic tomato fruit-set and source-sink ratio: a common relationship for different plant densities and seasons? Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 107(5): 805-815. doi:10.1093/aob/mcq244.
35. Khadari, B., Gibernau, M., Anstett, M.-C., Kjellberg, F., and Hossaert-McKey, M. 1995. When figs wait for pollinators: the length of fig receptivity. Am. J. Bot. 82(8): 992-999. doi:10.2307/2446228.
36. Kliber, A., and Eckert, C.G. 2004. Sequential decline in allocation among flowers within inflorescences: proximate mechanisms and adaptive significance. Ecology, 85(6): 1675-1687. doi:10.1890/03-0477.
37. Korpelainen, H. 1992. Patterns of resource allocation in male and female plants of Rumex acetosa and R. acetosella. Oecologia (Berl.), 89(1): 133-139. doi:10.1007/BF00319025.
38. Lee, T.D. 1988. Patterns of fruit and seed production. In Plant reproductive ecology. Edited by J.L. Doust and L.L. Doust. Oxford University, Press New York.
39. Lee, Y.F.K., and Jong, K. 1995. Longevity of flowers in the rattans Calamus subinermis and C. caesius (Palmae: Calamoideae). Sandakania, 6: 1-14.
40. Lee, Y.F.K., and Swaine, M.D. 1996. Reproductive phenology of some Calamus species in Borneo. In First annual scientific report of the project 'Conservation, genetic improvement and silviculture of rattan species in South East Asia', Jan.-Dec. 1995. Edited by R. Bacilieri. CIRAD-Forêt, Montpellier. pp. 1-178.
41. Lloyd, D.G., and Webb, C.J. 1977. Secondary sex characters in seed plants. Bot. Rev. 43(2): 177-216. doi:10.1007/BF02860717.
42. Manokaran, N. 1987. Flowering and fruiting patterns in Calamus caesius. In Recent research on rattan. Proceedings of the International Rattan Seminar, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 12-14 November 1987. Edited by A.N. Rao and I. Vongkaluang.
43. McCall, C., and Primack, R.B. 1985. Effects of pollen and nitrogen availability on reproduction in a woodland herb, Lysimachia quadrifolia. Oecologia (Berl.), 67(3): 403-410. doi:10.1007/BF00384947.
44. Nakamura, R.R. 1986. Maternal investment and fruit abortion in Phaseolus vulgaris. Am. J. Bot. 73(7): 1049-1057. doi:10.2307/2444124.
45. Nishikawa, Y. 1998. The function of multiple flowers of a spring ephemeral, Gagea lutea (Liliaceae), with reference to blooming order. Can. J. Bot. 76(8): 1404-1411.
46. Olesen, J.M., and Balslev, H. 1990. Flower biology and pollinators of the Amazonian monoecious palm, Geonoma macrostachys: a case of Bakerian mimicry. Principles, 34(4): 181-190.
47. Pellmyr, O., and Thompson, J.N. 1996. Sources of variation in pollinator contribution within a guild: the effects of plant and pollinator factors. Oecologia (Berl.), 107(4): 595-604. doi:10.1007/BF00333953.
48. Sandring, S., and Ågren, J. 2009. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display and flowering time in the perennial herb Arabidopsis lyrata. Evolution, 63(5): 1292-1300. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646. 2009.00624.x.
49. SAS Institute Inc. 2001. The SAS system. Version 8.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., USA.
50. Schlessman, M.A., Lowry, P.P., and Lloyd, D.G. 1990. Functional dioecism in the New Caledonian endemic Polyscias pancheri (Araliaceae). Biotropica, 22(2): 133-139. doi:10.2307/2388405.
51. Sornsathapornkul, P., and Pattanavibool, R. 2000. Reproductive biology of Calamus siamensis. Royal Forest Department, Thai-land.
52. Steinacher, G., and Wagner, J. 2010. Flower longevity and duration of pistil receptivity in high mountain plants. Flora, 205(6): 376-387. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2009.12.012.
53. Susko, D., and Lovett-Doust, L. 1999. Effects of resource availability, and fruit and ovule position on components of fecundity in Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). New Phytol. 144(2): 295-306. doi:10. 1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00524.x.
54. Thompson, D.I., and Edwards, T.J. 2001. Breeding biology, resource partitioning and reproductive effort of a dioecious shrub, Clutia pulchella L. (Euphorbiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 226(1-2): 13-22. doi:10.1007/s006060170070.
55. Thostesen, A.M., and Olesen, J.M. 1996. Pollen removal and deposition by specialist and generalist bumblebees in Aconitum septentrionale. Oikos, 77(1): 77-84. doi:10.2307/3545587.
56. Uhl, N.W., and Dransfield, J. 1987. Genera Palmarum. Allen Press, Kansas.
57. Vamosi, J.C., and Otto, S.P. 2002. When looks can kill: the evolution of sexually dimorphic floral display and the extinction of dioecious plants. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269(1496): 1187-1194. doi:10.1098/rspb. 2002.2004.
58. Vaughton, G., and Ramsey, M. 1998. Floral display, pollinator visitation and reproductive success in the dioecious perennial herb Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). Oecologia (Berl.), 115(1-2): 93-101. doi:10.1007/s004420050495.
59. Vidal, M.D.G., De Jong, D., Wien, H.C., and Morse, R.A. 2010. Pollination and fruit set in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) by honey bees. Rev. Bras. Bot. 33(1): 106-113. doi:10.1590/S0100-84042010000100010.
60. Zeng, Y.F., Bai, W.N., Zhou, Y., and Zhang, D.Y. 2009. Variation in floral sex allocation and reproductive success in sequentially flowering inflorescence of Corydalis remota var. lineariloba (Fumariaceae). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 51(3): 299-307. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00724.x.