The evolution of mating strategies in flowering plants

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 3, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 335-341

  Barrett, Spencer C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031691628     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01299-0     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Barrett S.C.H., Harder L.D. Ecology and evolution of plant mating. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;73-79.
2. Morgan M.T., Schoen D.J. The role of theory in an emerging new reproductive biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:1997;231-234.
3. Barrett S.C.H., Harder L.D., Worley A.C. The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 351:1996;1271-1280.
4. Venable D.L. Packaging and provisioning in plant reproduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 351:1996;1319-1329.
5. Jarne P., Charlesworth D. The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:1993;441-466.
6. Harder, L.D. and Barrett, S.C.H. (1996) Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants, in Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants (Lloyd, D.G. and Barrett, S.C.H., eds), pp. 140-190, Chapman & Hall.
7. Marshall D.L., Folsom M.W. Mate choice in plants: an anatomical to population perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22:1991;37-63.
8. Morgan M.T., Schoen D.J. The evolution of self-fertilization in perennials. Am. Nat. 150:1997;618-638.
9. Böhle U-T., Hilger H., Martin W.F. Island colonization and the evolution of the insular woody habit in Echium L. (Boraginaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:1996;11740-11745.
10. Lloyd D.G. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:1992;370-380.
11. Eckert, C.G. Contributions of autogamy and geitonogamy to self-fertilization in a mass-flowering, clonal plant, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae), Ecology (in press).
12. Eckert C.G., Barrett S.C.H. Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae): population genetic and experimental analyses. Evolution. 48:1994;952-964.
13. Harder L.D., Barrett S.C.H. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature. 373:1995;512-515.
14. Harder, L.D. and Wilson, W.G. A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effect with inbreeding depression on mating-system evolution, Am. Nat. (in press).
15. Charlesworth, D. Theories on the evolution of dioecy, in The Evolution of Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants (Geber, M.A., Dawson, T.E. and Delph, L.F., eds), Springer-Verlag (in press).
16. Seger J., Eckhart V.M. Evolution of sexual systems and sex allocation in plants when growth and reproduction overlap. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 263:1996;833-841.
17. Klinkhammer P.G.L., de Jong T.J., Metz H. Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:1997;260-265.
18. Day T., Aarssen L.W. A time commitment hypothesis for size-dependent gender allocation. Evolution. 51:1997;988-993.
19. Bickel A.M., Freeman D.C. Effects of pollen vector and plant geometry on floral sex ratio in monoecious plants. Am. Midl. Nat. 130:1993;239-247.
20. Sakai A.et al. Biogeographical and ecological correlates of dioecy in the Hawaiian Flora. Ecology. 76:1995;2530-2543.
21. Renner S.S., Ricklefs R.E. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 82:1995;596-606.
22. Sakai, A.K. et al. (1997) Phylogenetic perspectives on the evolution of dioecy: adaptive radiation in the endemic Hawaiian genera Schiedea and Alsinodendron, in Molecular Evolution and Adaptive Radiation (Givnish, T.J. and Sytsma, K.J., eds), pp. 455-474, Cambridge University Press.
23. Kohn J.R.et al. Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontederiaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast restriction-site variation. Evolution. 50:1996;1454-1469.
24. Schoen D.J.et al. Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution. 51:1997;1090-1099.
25. Costich D.E. Gender specialization across a climatic gradient: experimental comparisons of monoecious and dioecious Ecballium. Ecology. 76:1995;1036-1050.
26. Barrett S.C.H. Gender variation and the evolution of dioecy in Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 5:1992;423-444.
27. Barrett, S.C.H., Case, A.L. and Peters, G.B. Gender modification and resource allocation in subdioecious Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae), J. Ecol. (in press).
28. Pannell J. Widespread functional androdioecy in Mercurialis annua L. (Euphorbiaceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61:1997;95-116.
29. Pannell J. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in a metapopulation. Evolution. 51:1997;10-20.
30. Barrett, S.C.H. and Pannell, J. (1998) Metapopulation dynamics and mating-system evolution in plants, in Molecular Systematics and Plant Evolution (Hollingsworth, P., Bateman, R. and Gornall, R., eds), Taylor and Francis (in press).
31. Pannell J., Barrett S.C.H. Baker's Law revisited: reproductive assurance in a metapopulation. Evolution. 52:1998;657-668.
32. Sage, T.L. et al. Differential ovule development following self- and cross-pollination: the basis of self-sterility in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae), Am. J. Bot. (in press).
33. Sage, T.L., Bertin, R.I. and Williams, E.G. (1994) Ovarian and other late-acting self-incompatibility systems, in Genetic Control of Self-Incompatibility and Reproductive Development in Flowering Plants (Williams, E.G., Clarke, A.E. and Bruce Knox, R., eds), pp. 116-140, Kluwer.
34. de Nettancourt D. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Sex. Plant Reprod. 10:1997;185-199.
35. Richman A.D., Broothaerts W., Kohn J.R. Self-incompatibility RNases from three plant families: homology or convergence? Am. J. Bot. 84:1996;912-917.
36. Richman A.D., Kohn J.R. Learning from rejection: the evolutionary biology of single-locus incompatibility. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;497-502.
37. Holsinger, K.E. and Steinbachs, J.E. (1997) Mating systems and evolution in flowering plants, in Evolution and Diversification of Land Plants (Iwatsuki, K. and Raven, P., eds), pp. 223-248, Springer-Verlag.
38. Uyenoyama M.K. A generalized least squares estimate for the origin of sporophytic self-incompatibility. Genetics. 139:1995;975-992.
39. Athanasiou A., Shore J.S. Morph-specific proteins in pollen and styles of distylous Turnera (Turneraceae). Genetics. 146:1997;669-679.
40. Barrett, S.C.H. (1992) Heterostylous genetic polymorphisms: Model systems for evolutionary analysis, in Evolution and Function of Heterostyly (Barrett, S.C.H., ed.), pp. 1-29, Springer-Verlag.
41. Barrett S.C.H.et al. Sexual polymorphisms in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): is this species tristylous? Heredity. 78:1997;135-145.
42. Cruzan M.B., Barrett S.C.H. Post-pollination mechanisms influencing mating patterns and fecundity: an example from Eichhornia paniculata. Am. Nat. 147:1996;576-598.
43. Liu F., Zhang L., Charlesworth D. Genetic diversity in Leavenworthia populations with different inbreeding levels. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 265:1998;293-301.
44. Bradshaw H.D. Jr.et al. Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). Genetics. 149:1998;367-382.
45. Münster T.et al. Floral homeotic genes were recruited from homologous MADS-box genes preexisting in the common ancestor of ferns and seed plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:1997;2415-2420.