The Healthy Afterschool Activity and nutrition documentation instrument

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 263-271

  Ajja, Rahma ^a   Beets, Michael W ^a   Huberty, Jennifer ^b   Kaczynski, Andrew T ^a   Ward, Dianne S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^c University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH; CHILD NUTRITION; CURRICULUM; FRUIT; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTHY AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM FOR NUTRITION; HEALTHY AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM FOR PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; HUMAN; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; OBESITY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POLICY; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SCHOOL; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDITY; VEGETABLE;

CHILD; CURRICULUM; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NUTRITION POLICY; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCHOOLS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84865686182     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: 18732607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.020     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. After School Alliance National Afterschool Association website www.naaweb.org
2. M.W. Beets, A. Beighle, H.E. Erwin, J.L. Huberty After-school program impact on physical activity and fitness: a meta-analysis Am J Prev Med 36 6 2009 527 537
3. M.W. Beets, C. Webster, R. Saunders, J.L. Huberty Translating policies into practice: a framework for addressing childhood obesity in afterschool programs Health Promot Pract 2012 In press
4. M.W. Beets, F. Tilley, Y. Kim, C. Webster Nutritional policies and standards for snacks served in after-school programmes: a review Public Health Nutr 14 10 2011 1882 1890
5. M.W. Beets, M. Wallner, A. Beighle Defining standards and policies for promoting physical activity in afterschool programs J Sch Health 80 8 2010 411 417
6. J.L. Wiecha, L. Gannett, G. Hall, B.A. Roth National AfterSchool Association Standards for healthy eating and physical activity in out-of-school time porgrams www.niost.org
7. R.R. Rosenkranz, G.J. Welk, D.A. Dzewaltowski Environmental correlates of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in after-school recreation sessions J Phys Act Health 8 S 2 2011 S214 S221
8. K.J. Coleman, K.S. Geller, R.R. Rosenkranz, D.A. Dzewaltowski Physical activity and healthy eating in the after-school environment J Sch Health 78 12 2008 633 640
9. New York State Afterschool Network Program Quality Self-Assessment www.nysan.org
10. School-Age Care Environment Rating Scale ers.fpg.unc.edu/
11. Council on Accreditation www.coastandards.org
12. J.K. Bower, D.P. Hales, D.F. Tate, D.A. Rubin, S.E. Benjamin, D.S. Ward The childcare environment and children's physical activity Am J Prev Med 34 1 2008 23 29
13. K.E. Henderson, G.M. Grode, A.E. Middleton, E.L. Kenney, J. Falbe, M.B. Schwartz Validity of a measure to assess the child-care nutrition and physical activity environment J Am Diet Assoc 111 9 2011 1306 1313
14. S. Kim, K.C. Adamson, D.R. Balfanz Development of the Community Healthy Living Index: a tool to foster healthy environments for the prevention of obesity and chronic disease Prev Med 50 S1 2010 S80 S85
15. D. Ward, D. Hales, K. Haverly An instrument to assess the obesogenic environment of child care centers Am J Health Behav 32 4 2008 380 386
16. S.E. Benjamin, B. Neelon, S.C. Ball Reliability and validity of a nutrition and physical activity environmental self-assessment for child care Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 4 2007 29
17. Ammerman AS, Benjamin SE, Sommers JK, Ward DS. The Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care (NAP SACC) environmental self-assessment instrument. Division of Public Health, NC DHHS, Raleigh, NC, and the Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Revised May 2007.
18. M.W. Beets, J. Huberty, A. Beighle Physical activity of children attending afterschool programs: research- and practice-based implications Am J Prev Med 42 2 2012 180 184
19. M.W. Beets, L. Rooney, F. Tilley, A. Beighle, C. Webster Evaluation of policies to promote physical activity in afterschool programs: are we meeting current benchmarks? Prev Med 51 3-4 2010 299 301
20. S.G. Trost, R.R. Rosenkranz, D. Dzewaltowski Physical activity levels among children attending after-school programs Med Sci Sports Exerc 40 4 2008 622 629
21. R.S. Mozaffarian, J.L. Wiecha, B.A. Roth Impact of an organizational intervention designed to improve snack and beverage quality in YMCA after-school programs Am J Public Health 100 5 2010 925 932
22. The After-School Alliance Making the afterschool hours active hours: the Afterschool Alliance obesity prevention agenda Washington DC 2006
23. USDA Food and Nutrition Service www.fns.usda.gov
24. M.W. Beets, J.L. Huberty, A. Beighle Healthy Afterschool Program Network Pedometer-determined physical activity of children attending afterschool programs: research- and practice-based implications Am J Prev Med 42 2 2012 180 184
25. M.W. Beets, M.M. Patton, S. Edwards The accuracy of pedometer steps and time during walking in children Med Sci Sports Exerc 37 3 2005 513 520
26. S.E. Crouter, P.L. Schneider, M. Karabulut, D.R. Bassett Jr Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost Med Sci Sports Exerc 35 8 2003 1455 1460
27. J.R. Landis, G.G. Koch The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 1 1977 159 174
28. M.G. Boarnet, K. Day, M. Alfonzo, A. Forsyth The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: reliability tests Am J Prev Med 30 2 2006 153 159
29. Beets MW. Enhancing the translation of physical activity interventions in afterschool programs. Am J Lifestyle Med;6(4):328-41.
30. C. Tudor-Locke, J.E. Williams, J.P. Reis, D. Pluto Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity Sports Med 32 12 2002 795 808
31. E. McNamara, Z. Hudson, S.J. Taylor Measuring activity levels of young people: the validity of pedometers Br Med Bull 95 2010 121 137