Analysis of impinging wall effects on hydrogen non-premixed flame

Combustion Science and Technology

Volumn 184, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1244-1268

  Ranga Dinesh, K K J ^a   Jiang, X ^a   Van Oijen, J A ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Buoyancy; DNS; Hydrogen combustion; Impinging jet; Wall heat flux

Indexed keywords

CARTESIAN GRID; COMPACT FINITE DIFFERENCES; COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS; DETAILED CHEMICAL KINETIC; DIRECT IMPACT; DISCRETIZED EQUATIONS; DNS; EXTERNAL PERTURBATIONS; FLAME TEMPERATURES; FLAME-WALL INTERACTION; FLAMELET GENERATED MANIFOLDS; HYDROGEN COMBUSTION; IMPINGING JET; JET DIAMETER; NEAR-WALL HEAT TRANSFER; NON-PREMIXED FLAME; NOZZLE-TO-PLATE DISTANCE; SPATIAL DISCRETIZATIONS; THIRD-ORDER; VORTICAL STRUCTURES; WALL EFFECTS; WALL HEAT FLUX; WALL JET;

BUOYANCY; COMBUSTION; HYDROGEN; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; RUNGE KUTTA METHODS; VORTICITY;

HEAT FLUX;

EID: 84865682038     PISSN: 00102202     EISSN: 1563521X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2012.679715     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alshaalan, T.M., and Rutland, C.J. 2002. Wall heat flux in turbulent premixed reacting flow. Combust. Sci. Technol., 174, 135-165.
2. Anderson, K.R., and Mahalingam, S. 2000. Numerical study of vortex flame interaction in actively forced non-premixed confined jets. J. Heat Transfer, 122, 376-380.
3. Anderson, K.R., Mahalingam, S., and Hertzberg, J. 1999. A two-dimensional planner computational investigation of flame broadening in confined non-premixed jets. Combust. Flame, 118, 233-247. (Pubitemid 29226655)
4. Barlow, R.S., and Carter, C.D. 1994. Raman=Rayleigh=LIF measurements of nitric oxide formation in turbulent hydrogen jet flames. Combust. Flame, 97, 261-280. (Pubitemid 24176866)
5. Barlow, R.S., and Carter, C.D. 1996. Relationships among nitric oxide, temperature and mixture fraction in hydrogen jet flame. Combust. Flame, 104, 288-299. (Pubitemid 26078851)
6. Bellenoue, M., Kageyama, T., Labuda, S.A., and Sotton, J. 2004. Direct measurements of laminar flame quenching distance in a close vessel. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 27, 323-331. (Pubitemid 36257787)
7. Blint, R.J., and Bechtel, J.H. 1982. Flame=wall interface: Theory and experiment. Combust. Sci. Technol., 27, 87-95.
8. Bruneaux, G., Akselvoll, K., Poinsot, T., and Ferziger, J.H. 1996. Flame-wall interaction simulation in a turbulent channel flow. Combust. Flame, 107, 27-44.
9. Dabireau, F., Cuenot, B., Vermorel, O., and Poinsot, T. 2003. Interaction of flames of H2̌O2 with inert walls. Combust. Flame, 135, 123-133. (Pubitemid 37211291)
10. Davis, S.G., Ameya, V.J., Wang, H., and Egolfopoulos, F. 2005. An optimised kinetic model of H2=CO combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 30, 1283-1292.
11. Eggels, R.L.G.M., and de Goey, L.P.H. 1995. Mathematically reduced mechanisms applied to adiabatic flat hydrogen=air flames. Combust. Flame, 100, 559-570.
12. Enomoto, M. 2002. Sidewall quenching of laminar premixed flames propagating along the single wall surface. Proc. Combust. Inst., 29, 781-787.
13. Ezekoye, O.A., Greif, R., and Sawyer, R.F. 1992. Increased surface temperature effects on wall heat transfer during unsteady flame quenching. Proc. Combust. Inst., 24, 1465-1472.
14. Foucher, F., Burnel, S., Mounaim-Rousselle, C., Boukhalfa, M., Renou, B., and Trinite, M. 2003. Flame wall interaction: Effect of stretch. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 27, 431-437. (Pubitemid 36586334)
15. Fritz, J., Kroner, M., and Sattelmayer, T. 2004. Flashback in a swirl burner with cylindrical premixed zone. J. Gas Turbines Power, 126, 276-283. (Pubitemid 40231358)
16. Gruber, A., Sankaran, R., Hawkes, E.R., and Chen, J.H. 2010. Turbulent flame-wall interaction: A direct numerical simulation study. J. Fluid Mech., 658, 5-32.
17. Hocks, W., Peters, N., and Adomeit, G. 1981. Flame quenching in front of a cold wall under two steps kinetics. Combust. Flame, 41, 157-170. (Pubitemid 12425439)
18. Houf, W., and Schefer, R. 2007. Predicting radiative heat fluxes and flammability envelopes from unintended releases of hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, 136-151. (Pubitemid 46074364)
19. Konnov, A.A. 2008. Remaining uncertainties in the kinetic mechanism of hydrogen combustion. Combust. Flame, 152, 507-528.
20. Lele, S.K. 1992. Compact finite difference scheme with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys., 103, 16-42.
21. Maas, U., and Pope, S.B. 1994. Laminar flame calculations using simplified chemical kinetics based on intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds. Proc. Combust. Inst., 25, 1349-1356.
22. Marban, G., and Valdes-Solfs, T. 2007. Towards the hydrogen economy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32, 1625-1637.
23. Massias, A., Diamantis, D., Mastorakos, E., and Goussis, D.A. 1999. An algorithm for the construction of global reduced mechanisms with CSP data. Combust. Flame, 117, 685-708. (Pubitemid 29144440)
24. Peters, N. 1991. Reducing mechanisms. In Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms and symptotic Approximations for Methane-Air Flames,M. D. Smooke (Ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 48-85.
25. Peters, N. 2000. Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
26. Pitsch, H. 2010. Shedding new light on a burning question. J. Fluid Mech., 658, 1-4.
27. Poinsot, T., Haworth, D.C., and Bruneaux, G. 1993. Direct simulation and modelling of flame-wall interaction for premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Flame, 95, 118-132. (Pubitemid 23284729)
28. Poinsot, T.J., and Lele, S.K. 1992. Boundary-conditions for direct numerical simulations of compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys., 101, 104-129.
29. Popp, P., and Baum, M. 1997. Analysis of wall heat fluxes, reaction mechanisms, and unburnt hydrocarbons during the head-on-quenching of a laminar methane flame. Combust. Flame, 108, 327-348. (Pubitemid 27063600)
30. Saxena, P., and Williams, F.A. 2006. Testing a small detailed chemical kinetic mechanism for the combustion of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Combust. Flame, 145, 316-325.
31. Schefer, R.W. 2003. Hydrogen enrichment for improved lean flame stability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 28, 1131-1141.
32. van Oijen, J.A., and de Goey, L.P.H. 2000. Modelling of premixed laminar flames using flamelet-generated manifolds. Combustion Sci. Technol., 161, 113-137.
33. Westbrook, C.K., Adamczyk, A.A., and Lavoie, G.A. 1981. A numerical study of laminar flame wall quenching. Combust. Flame, 40, 81-99.
34. Westbrook, C.K., and Dryer, F.L. 1984. Chemical kinetic modelling of hydrogcarbon combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 10, 1-57.
35. Westbrook, C.K., Mizobuchi, Y., Poinsot, T.J., Smith, P.J., and Warnatz, J. 2005. Computational combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst., 30, 125-157.
36. Williams, F.A. 2008. Detailed and reduced chemistry for hydrogen autoignition. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 21, 131-135. (Pubitemid 351329594)
37. Williamson, J.H. 1980. Low-storage Runge-Kutta schemes. J. Comput. Phys., 35, 48-56.