The incidence of maxillary sinus membrane perforation during endoscopically assessed crestal sinus floor elevation: A pilot study

Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 345-359

  Garbacea, Antoanela ^a   Lozada, Jaime L ^a   Church, Christopher A ^b   Al Ardah, Aladdin J ^a   Seiberling, Kristin A ^b   Naylor, W Patrick ^a   Chen, Jung Wei ^a  

^a LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cadaver; Crestal sinus graft; Schneiderian membrane; Sinus endoscopy

Indexed keywords

BETA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; COLORING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; HYDROXYAPATITE; METHYLENE BLUE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ENDOSCOPY; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; INJURY; MAXILLARY SINUS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NOSE MUCOSA; OSTEOTOMY; PATHOLOGY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PILOT STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CADAVER; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; COLORING AGENTS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DURAPATITE; ENDOSCOPES; ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MAXILLARY SINUS; METHYLENE BLUE; MIDDLE AGED; NASAL MUCOSA; OSTEOTOMY; PILOT PROJECTS; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY;

EID: 84865677735     PISSN: 01606972     EISSN: 15481336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00083     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Boyne PJ, James R. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:613-616.
2. Tatum H. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstruction. Dent Clin North America. 1986;30:207-229.
3. Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Vogel G. Tridimensional reconstruction of knife-edge edentulous maxillae by sinus elevation, onlay grafts, and sagital osteotomy of the anterior maxilla: preliminary surgical and phrostetic results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:394-399.
4. Whittaker JM, James RA, Lozada J, Cordova C, GaRey DJ. Histological response and clinical evaluation of heterograft and allograft materials in the elevation of the maxillary sinus for the preparation of endosteal dental implant sites: simultaneous sinus elevation and root form implantation: an eight-month autopsy report. J Oral Implantol. 1989;15:141-144.
5. Smiler DG, Holmes RE. Sinus lift procedure using porous hydroxyapatite: a preliminary clinical report. J Oral Implantol. 1987;13:239-253.
6. Wheeler SL, Holmes RE, Calhoun CJ. Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:26-34.
7. Smiler DG, Johnson PW, Lozada JL. Sinus lift grafts and endosseous implants: treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla. Dent Clin North Am. 1992; 36:151-186.
8. Browaeys H, Bouvry P, De Bruyn H. A literature review on biomaterials in sinus augmentation procedures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007;9:166-177.
9. Nkenke E, Stelzle F. Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(suppl 4):124-133.
10. Cho SC, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Tarnow DP. Influence of anatomy on Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus elevation surgery: three dimensions analysis. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001; 13:160-163.
11. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol. 2004;75:511-516.
12. Levin B, Al-Maseeh J, Symeonides E. The osteotome technique: a classification for technique approach and clinical case reports. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005;26;551-556.
13. Proussaefs P, Olivier HS, Lozada J. Histologic evaluation of a 12-year-old threaded hydroxyapatitecoated implant placed in conjunction with subantral augmentation procedure: a clinical report. J Prosthetic Dent. 2004;92:17-22.
14. Shlomi B, Horowitz I, Kahn A, Dobriyan A, Chaushu G. The effect of sinus membrane perforation and repair with Lambone on the outcome of the maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a radiographic assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19: 559-562.
15. Sorni M, Guarinos J, Penarrocha M. Implants in anatomical buttresses of the upper jaw. Med Oral Patol Oral Circ Buccal. 2005;10:163-168.
16. Buchmann R, Khoury F, Faust C, Lange DE. Periimplant conditions in periodontally compromised patients following maxillary sinus augmentation: a long term post therapy trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10: 103-110.
17. Nkenke E, Schegel A, Schultze-Morgau S, Neukam FW, Wiltfang J. The endoscopically controlled osteotome sinus floor elevation: a preliminary prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofal Implants. 2002;17:577-566.
18. Stricker A, Voss PJ, Gutwald R, Schramm A, Schmelzeinsen R. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone grafts to enable placement of SLA-surfaced implants: preliminary results after 15-40 months. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:207-212.
19. Pjetursson BE, Tan CW, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation Part I: lateral approach. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:216-240.
20. Pikos MA. Maxillary sinus membrane repair: report of a technique for large perforations. Implant Dent. 1999;8:29-34.
21. Stelzle F, Benner KU. Evaluation of different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of 10 mm: an experimental ex vivo study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:124-133.
22. Misch CE. The maxillary sinus lift and sinus graft surgery. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. Chicago, Ill: Mosby; 1999:469-495.
23. Kasabah S, Krug J, Simunek A, et al. Can we predict maxillary sinus mucosa perforation? Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2003;46:19-23.
24. Bergh van den JP, Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:256-265.
25. Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Oliver AJ. Varying treatment strategies for reconstruction of maxillary atrophy with implants: results in 98 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52:210-216.
26. Chanavaz M. Maxillary sinus: anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology-11 years of surgical experience (1997-1990). J Oral Implantol. 1990;16;199-209.
27. Aimetti M, Romagnoli R, Ricci G, Massei G. Maxillary sinus elevation: macrolaceration and microlacerations of the sinus membrane as determined by endoscopy. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2001;21:581-589.
28. Cordioli G, Atiyeh F, Piatelli A, Majzoub Z. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement: clinical and histological findings. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:270-278.
29. Komarnyckyj OG, London RM. Osteotome single stage dental implant placement with and without sinus elevation: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implants. 1998;13:799-804.
30. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol. 2004;75:511-516.
31. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: part 3: the less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1994;15:698-704.
32. Rosen PS, Summers R, Mellado JR, et al. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:853-858.
33. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1994;15:152-162.
34. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: part 2-the ridge expansion osteotomy (REO) procedure. Compend Cont Educ Dent. 1994;15:422-426.
35. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1995;16:1090-1099.
36. Fugazzotto PA. Sinus floor augmentation of the maxillary molar extraction socket: a modified technique to increase bone height. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:536-542.
37. Tan CW, Lang P, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation Part II: transalveolar technique. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(suppl 8):241-254.
38. Wiltfang, J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Merten HA, Kessler P, Ludwig A, Engelke W. Endoscopic and ultrasonographic evaluation of the maxillary sinus after combined sinus floor augmentation and implant insertion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89:288-291.
39. Grunenberg M, Gerlach KL. Clinical, radiographic and endoscopic evaluation of the maxillary sinus after maxillary osteotomy. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1990;14:202-205.
40. Ritter L, Lutz J, Neugebauer J, et al. Prevalence of pathologic findings in the maxillary sinus in conebeam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111:634-640.
41. Lozada JL, Goodacre C, Al-Ardah AJ, Garbacea A. Lateral and crestal bone planing antrostomy: a simplified surgical procedure to reduce the incidence of membrane perforation during maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. J Prosth Dent. 2011;105:147-153.
42. Engelke W, Deckwer I. Endoscopically controlled sinus floor augmentation: a preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:527-531.
43. Berengo M. Sivonella S, Majzoub Z, Cordiolo G. Endoscopic evaluation of the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33;189-194.
44. Reiser G, Rabinovits Z, Bruno J, Damoulis PD, Griffin T. Evaluation of the maxillary sinus membrane response following elevation with the crestal osteotome technique in human cadavers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16;833-840.
45. Zitzman N, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla: comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:8-17.
46. Chan RW, Titze IR. Effect of post-mortem changes and freezing on the viscoelastic properties of vocal fold tissues. Ann Biomed Eng. 2003;31:482-491.
47. Pommer B. Mechanical properties of Schneiderian membrane in vitro. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2009; 20:633-637.
48. Janner SFM, Caversaccio MD, Dubach P, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein M. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane: a radiographic analysis using cone beam computer tomography in patients referred for dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1446-1453.
49. Fatterpekar GM, Delman BN, Som PM. Imaging the paranasal sinuses: where we are and where we are going. Anat Rec. 2008;291:1564-1572.
50. Fornell J, Johansson LA, Bolin A, Isaksson S, Sennerby L. Flapless, CBCT-guided osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant installation. I: radiographic examination and surgical technique. A prospective 1-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:28-34.
51. Katheria BC, Kau CH, Tate R, Chen JW, English J, Bouquot J. Effectiveness of impacted and supernumerary tooth diagnosis from traditional radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography. Pediatr Dent. 2010;32:304-309.
52. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:126-130.
53. Bremke M, Sesterhenn AM, Murthum T, et al. Digital volume tomography (DVT) as a diagnostic modality of the anterior skull base. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129:1106-1114.