Comparison of health state utility values derived using time trade-off, rank and discrete choice data anchored on the full health-dead scale

European Journal of Health Economics

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 575-587

  Brazier, John ^a   Rowen, Donna ^a   Yang, Yaling ^b   Tsuchiya, Aki ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discrete choice experiment; Health state utility values; Preference based measures; QALYs; Ranking

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; ASTHMA QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FULL HEALTH DEAD SCALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT; TIME TRADE OFF;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ASTHMA; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865634926     PISSN: 16187598     EISSN: 16187601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-011-0352-9     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Gold, M.R.; Siegel, J.E.; Russell, L.B.; Weinstein, M.C.: Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)
2. NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence): Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. NICE, London (2008)
3. Drummond, M.F.; Sculpher, M.; O'Brien, B.; et al.: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford (2005)
4. P Dolan 1997 Modelling valuation for Euroqol health states Med. Care 35 351 363 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002
5. J Brazier J Roberts M Deverill 2002 The estimation of a preference based single index measure for health from the SF-36 J. Health. Econ. 21 271 292 11939242 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8
6. D Feeny W Furlong G Torrance, et al. 2002 Multiattribute and single attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system Med. Care 40 113 128 11802084 10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006
7. H Bleichrodt 2002 A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities Health Econ. 11 447 456 12112493 10.1002/hec.688
8. P Kind 1982 A comparison of two models for scaling health indicators Int. J. Epidemiol. 11 271 275 7129741 10.1093/ije/11.3.271 1:STN:280: DyaL3s%2FivF2nsQ%3D%3D
9. JA Salomon 2003 Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data Popul. Health Metrol. 1 12 10.1186/1478-7954-1-12
10. C McCabe J Brazier P Gilks, et al. 2006 Using rank data to estimate health state utility models J. Health. Econ. 25 418 431 16499981 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.07.008
11. JM Burr M Kilonzo L Vale, et al. 2007 Developing a preference-based glaucoma utility index using a discrete choice experiment Optom. Vis. Sci. 84 797 808 17700343 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181339f30
12. J Ratcliffe J Brazier A Tsuchiya, et al. 2009 Using DCE and ranking data to estimate cardinal values for health states for deriving a preference-based single index from the sexual quality of life questionnaire Health Econ. 18 1261 1276 19142985 10.1002/hec.1426
13. M Ryan A Netten D Skatun, et al. 2006 Using discrete choice experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome-an application to social care for older people J. Health. Econ. 25 927 944 16464513 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006. 01.001
14. LL Thurstone 1927 A law of comparative judgement Psychol. Rev. 34 273 286 10.1037/h0070288
15. S Fanshel JW Bush 1970 A health status index and its application to health services outcomes Oper. Res. 18 1021 1066 10.1287/opre.18.6.1021
16. Kind, P.: Applying paired comparisons models to EQ-5D valuations-deriving TTO utilities from ordinal preferences data. In: Kind, P.; Brooks, R.; Rabin, R. (eds.) EQ-5D Concepts and Methods: A Developmental History. Springer, The Netherlands (2005)
17. Luce, R.D.: Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. Wiley, New York (1959)
18. McFadden, D.: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York (1974)
19. Z Hakim DS Pathak 1999 Modelling the EuroQol data: a comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modelling Health Econ. 8 103 116 10342724 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199903)8:2<103::AID-HEC393>3.0.CO;2- E 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3nt1WmsA%3D%3D
20. R Johnson M Banzhaf W Desvousges 2000 Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple-format, stated preference approach Health Econ. 9 295 317 10862074 10.1002/1099-1050(200006)9:4<295:: AID-HEC520>3.0.CO;2-D 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgvFGntw%3D%3D
21. LM Osman L McKenzie J Cairns, et al. 2001 Patient weighting of importance of asthma symptoms Thorax 56 138 142 11209103 10.1136/thorax.56.2.138 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7lsF2gsA%3D%3D
22. Young, T.; Yang, Y.; Brazier, J.; Tsuchiya, A.: The use of Rasch analysis in reducing a large condition-specific instrument for preference valuation: the case of moving from AQLQ to AQL-5D. Med. Decis. Mak. 31, 195-210 (2011)
23. EF Juniper GH Guyatt PJ Ferrie, et al. 1993 Measuring quality of life in asthma Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 147 832 838 8466117 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3itFSitw%3D%3D
24. T Young Y Yang J Brazier, et al. 2009 The first stage of developing preference-based measures: constructing a health-state classification using Rasch analysis Qual. Life Res. 18 253 265 19082759 10.1007/s11136-008-9428-0
25. K Coyne D Revicki T Hunt, et al. 2002 Psychometric validation of an overactive bladder symptom and health related quality of life questionnaire: the OAB-q Qual. Life Res. 11 563 574 12206577 10.1023/A:1016370925601 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vkslWjug%3D%3D
26. MVH Group: The Measurement and Valuation of Health: Final Report on the Modelling of Valuation Tariffs. Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York (1995)
27. J Huber K Zwerina 1996 The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs J. Market. Res. 33 307 317 10.2307/3152127
28. Yang, Y.; Tsuchiya, A.; Brazier, J.; Young, T.: Estimating a preference-based index for a 5-dimensional health state classification for asthma derived from the asthma quality of life questionnaire. Med. Decis. Mak. 31, 281-291 (2011)
29. Y Yang JE Brazier A Tsuchyia, et al. 2009 Estimating a preference-based index from the Over Active Bladder questionnaire Value Health 12 159 166 18647258 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00413.x
30. Brazier, J.; Ratcliffe, J.; Salomon, J.A.; et al.: The Measurement and Valuation of Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
31. Kind, P.; Harman, G.; Macran, S.: UK Population Norms for EQ-5D. Centre for Health Economics Discussion Series, University of York, York (1999)
32. DL Patrick HE Starks KC Cain RF Uhlmann RA Pearlman 1994 Measuring preferences for health states worse than death Med. Decis. Mak. 14 1 9 18 10.1177/0272989X9401400102 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3gtlSgsw%3D%3D
33. JJ Louviere 2006 What you don't know might hurt you: some unresolved issues in the design and analysis of discrete choice experiments Environ. Resource Econ. 34 173 188 10.1007/s10640-005-4817-0
34. T Flynn JJ Louviere TJ Peters J Coast 2011 Best-worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it J. Health Econ. 26 171 189 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002
35. J Swait JJ Louviere 1993 The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models J. Market. Res. 30 305 314 10.2307/3172883
36. Train, K.: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
37. Bansback, N.; Brazier, J.; Tsuchiya, A.; Anis, A.: Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate societal health state utility values. Health Economics and Decision Science Discussion Paper 10/03, University of Sheffield, Sheffield (2010)
38. TN Flynn JJ Louviere AAJ Marley J Coast TJ Peters 2008 Rescaling quality of life values from discrete choice experiments for use as QALYs: a cautionary tale Popul. Health Met. 6 6 10.1186/1478-7954-6-6