Mechanical loading, damping, and load-driven bone formation in mouse tibiae

Bone

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 810-818

  Dodge, Todd ^a   Wanis, Mina ^a   Ayoub, Ramez ^b   Zhao, Liming ^a   Watts, Nelson B ^c   Bhattacharya, Amit ^d   Akkus, Ozan ^e   Robling, Alexander ^a,f   Yokota, Hiroki ^a,f  

^a Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Mercy Health Osteoporosis and Bone Health Services   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Case Western Reserve University   (United States)

^f INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone remodeling; Damping; Phase shift angle; Tibia loading; Ulna loading

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE GROWTH; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAMPING; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUSE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; VISCOELASTICITY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; TIBIA;

EID: 84865626298     PISSN: 87563282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.07.021     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Schuit S.C.E., van der Klift M., Weel A.E.A.M., de Laet C.E.D.H., Burger H., Seeman E., et al. Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 2004, 34:195-202.
2. Bhattacharya A., Watts N.B., Davis K., Kotowski S., Shukla R., Dwivedi A.K., et al. Dynamic bone quality: a noninvasive measure of bone's biomechanical property in osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom 2010, 13:228-236.
3. Panteliou S.D., Xirafaki A.L., Panagiotopoulos E., Varakis J.N., Cagenas N.V., Kontoyannis C.G. Modal damping for monitoring bone integrity and osteoporosis. J Biomech Eng 2004, 12:1-5.
4. Yeni Y.N., Shaffer R.R., Baker K.C., Dong X.N., Grimm M.J., Les C.M., et al. The effect of yield damage on the viscoelastic properties of cortical bone tissue as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis. J Biomed Mater Res 2007, 82A:530-537.
5. Linde F., Hvid I., Pongsoipetch B. Energy absorptive properties of human trabecular bone specimens during axial compression. J Orthop Res 1989, 7(3):432-439.
6. Yamashita J., Furman B.R., Rawis H.R., Wang X., Agrawal C.M. The use of dynamic mechanical analysis to assess the viscoelastic properties of human cortical bone. J Biomed Mater Res 2001, 58(1):47-53.
7. Roderic L. Viscoelastic solids 1998, Blackwell Publisher.
8. Chattah N., Sharir A., Weiner S., Shahar R. Determining the elastic modulus of mouse cortical bone using electronic speckle pattern interferometry (ESPI) and micro computed tomography: a new approach for characterizing small-bone material properties. Bone 2009, 45(1):84-90.
9. Fortis A.P., Kostopoulos V., Panagiotopoulos E., Tsantzalis S., Kokkinos A. Viscoelastic properties of cartilage-subchondral bone complex in osteoarthritis. J Med Eng Technol 2004, 28:223-226.
10. Yamashita J., Li X., Furman B.R., Rawls H.R., Wang X., Agrawal C.M. Collagen and bone viscoelasticity: a dynamic mechanical analysis. J Biomed Mater Res 2002, 63:31-36.
11. Fondrk M., Bahniuk E., Davy D.T., Michaels C. Some viscoplastic characteristics of bovine and human cortical bone. J Biomech 1988, 21:623-630.
12. Weaver T.D. The shape of the Neandertal femur is primarily the consequence of a hyperpolar body form. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100(12):6926-6929.
13. Biewener A.A. Musculoskeletal design in relation to body size. J Biomech 1991, 24(Suppl. 1):19-29.
14. Bertram J.E., Biewener A.A. Bone curvature: sacrificing strength for load predictability?. J Theor Biol 1988, 131:75-92.
15. Main R.P., Lynch M.E., van der Meulen M.C. In vivo tibial stiffness is maintained by whole bone morphology and cross-sectional geometry in growing female mice. J Biomech 2010, 43:2689-2694.
16. Christiansen B.A., Bayly P.V., Silva M.J. Constrained tibial vibration in mice: a method for studying the effects of vibrational loading of bone. J Biomech Eng 2008, 130(4):044502.
17. Ozcivici E., Luu Y.K., Rubin C.T., Judex S. Low-level vibrations retain bone marrow's osteogenic potential and augment recovery of trabecular bone during reambulation. PLoS One 2010, 5:e11178.
18. David V., Martin A., Lagage-Proust M.H., Malaval L., Peyroche S., Jones D.B., et al. Mechanical loading down-regulates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor g in bone marrow stromal cells and favors osteoblastogenesis at the expense of adipogenesis. Endocrinology 2007, 148:2553-2562.
19. Burr D.B. Why bones bend but don't break. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2011, 11(4):270-285.
20. Milgrom C., Giladi M., Simkin A., Rand N., Dedem R., Kashtan H., et al. The area moment of inertia of the tibia: a risk factor for stress fractures. J Biomech 1989, 22:1243-1248.
21. Kobayashi T., Takeda N., Atsuta Y., Matsuno T. Flattening of sagittal spinal curvature as a predictor of vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19(1):65-69.