How melt-stretching affects mechanical behavior of polymer glasses

Macromolecules

Volumn 45, Issue 16, 2012, Pages 6719-6732

  Zartman, Gregory D ^a   Cheng, Shiwang ^a   Li, Xin ^a   Lin, Fei ^a   Becker, Matthew L ^a   Wang, Shi Qing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMORPHOUS POLYMERS; CHAIN NETWORKS; ENTANGLEMENT NETWORKS; FAILURE STRESS; LOAD BEARING; LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; MECHANICAL RESPONSE; PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH; POLYMER GLASS; PRIMARY STRUCTURES; ROOM TEMPERATURE; STRUCTURAL HYBRID; THERMAL QUENCHING;

MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; POLYMERS; VAN DER WAALS FORCES;

GLASS;

EID: 84865612726     PISSN: 00249297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ma300955h     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Proceeding of the Second International Conference on Fracture; Brighton; Pratt, P. L., Ed.; Chapman and Hall London: London, 1969; p 503.
2. Kinloch, A. J. and Young, R. J. In Fracture Behaviour of Polymers; Applied Science Publishers: London, 1983.
3. Deformation and Fracture Behaviour of Polymers; Grellmann, W. and Seidler, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 2001.
4. Senden, D. J. A.; Van Dommelen, J. A. W.; Govaert, L. E. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 2010, 48, 1483
5. Govaert, L. E.; Engels, T. A. P.; Wendlandt, M.; Tervoort, T. A.; Suter, U. W. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 2008, 46, 2475
6. Govaert, L. E.; Tervoort, T. A. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 2004, 42, 2041
7. van Melick, H. G. H.; Govaert, L. E.; Meijer, H. E. H. Polymer 2003, 44, 3579
8. van Melick, H. G. H.; Govaert, L. E.; Meijer, H. E. H. Polymer 2003, 44, 2493
9. Hoy, R. S.; Robbins, M. O. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 2006, 44, 3487
10. Hoy, R. S.; Robbins, M. O. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 117801
11. Hoy, R. S.; Robbins, M. O. Phys. Rev. E 2008, 77, 031801
12. Robbins, M. O.; Hoy, R. S. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 2009, 47, 1406
13. Hoy, R. S.; Robbins, M. O. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 244901
14. Ge, T.; Robbins, M. O. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 2010, 48, 1473
15. Li, H. X.; Buckley, C. P. Int. J. Plast. 2010, 26, 1726
16. Vorselaars, B.; Lyulin, A. V.; Michels, M. A. J. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 5829
17. Vorselaars, B.; Lyulin, A. V.; Michels, M. A. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 074905
18. Lyulin, A. V.; Vorselaars, B.; Mazo, M. A.; Balabaev, N. K.; Michels, M. A. J. Europhys. Lett. 2005, 71, 618
19. Chen, K.; Schweizer, K. S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 038301
20. Chen, K.; Saltzman, E. J.; Schweizer, K. S. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2010, 1, 277
21. Ludwik, P. VDI-Z 1927, 71, 1532
22. Davidenkov, N. N.; Wittman, F. Phys. Tech. Znst. (USSR) 1937, 4, 300
23. Orowan, E. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1949, 12, 185
24. Vincent, P. I. Polymer 1972, 13, 558
25. Vincent, P. I. Polymer 1960, 1, 425
26. B defined in eq 1
27. Matsushige, K.; Radcliffe, S. V.; Baer, E. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1976, 20, 1853
28. Kambour, R. P. J. Polym. Sci., Macromol. Rev. 1973, 7, 1
29. Rabinowitz, S.; Beadmore, P. CRC Crit. Rev. Macromol. Sci. 1972, 7
30. Kramer, E. J. Adv. Polym. Sci. 1983, 52/53, 1
31. Kramer, E. J.; Berger, L. Adv. Polym. Sci. 1990, 91, 1
32. Donald, A. M. In The Physics of Glassy Polymers, 2 nd ed.; Haward, R. N.; Young, R. J., Eds.; Chapman and Hall: London, 1997.
33. Creton, C.; Kramer, E. J.; Brown, H. R.; Hui, C. Y. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2001, 156, 53
34. Kramer, E. J. J. Macromol. Sci., Phys. 1974, 10, 191
35. B, this concept of regarding yield and fracture as competitive processes provides a useful starting point."
36. Sauer, J. A. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Symp. 1971, 32, 69
37. Boyer, R. F. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1968, 8, 161
38. Heijboer, J. In Molecular Basis of Transitions and Relaxations; Meier, D. J., Ed.; Gordon and Breach: London, 1978; pp 75-102.
39. McCmm, N. G.; Read, B. E.; Williams, G. Anelastic and Dielectric Effects in Polymeric Solids; Wiley: NewYork, 1967.
40. Kastelic, J. R.; Baer, E. J. Macromol. Sci., Phys 1973, 7, 679
41. Wellinghoff, S. T.; Baer, E. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1978, 22, 2025
42. Arharoni, S. M. Macromolecules 1985, 18, 2624
43. Donald, A. M.; Kramer, E. J. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 1982, 20, 899
44. Donald, A. M.; Kramer, E. J. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 1982, 20, 1129
45. Donald, A. M.; Kramer, E. J. J. Mater. Sci. 1982, 17, 1871
46. Washiyama, J.; Kramer, E. J.; Hui, C. Y. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 2928
47. Washiyama, J.; Kramer, E. J.; Creton, C. F. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 2019
48. Benkoski, J. J.; Fredrickson, G. H.; Kramer, E. J. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2002, 39, 2363
49. Benkoski, J. J.; Fredrickson, G. H.; Kramer, E. J. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2002, 40, 2377
50. Benkoski, J. J.; Flores, P.; Kramer, E. J. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 3289
51. Brown, H. R.; Hui, C. Y.; Raphael, E. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 608
52. Creton, C.; Brown, H. R.; Shull, K. R. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 3174
53. Henkee, C. S.; Kramer, E. J. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 1984, 22, 721
54. Hui, C. Y.; Kramer, E. J. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1995, 35, 419
55. Sha, Y.; Hui, C. Y.; Kramer, E. J. J. Mater. Sci. 1999, 34, 3695
56. Kramer, E. J. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 2005, 43, 3369
57. Boyce, M. C.; Parks, D. M.; Argon, A. S. Mech. Mater. 1988, 7, 15
58. Arruda, E. M.; Boyce, M. C. Int. J. Plast. 1993, 9, 697
59. Struik, L. C. E. Physical Aging of Amorphous Polymers and Other Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1978.
60. Holliday, L.; Mann, J.; Pogany, G. A.; Pugh, H.; Gunn, H. A. Nature 1964, 202, 381
61. Biglione, L.; Baer, E.; Radcliffe, S. V. In Proceeding of the Second International Conference on Fracture, Brighton; Pratt, P. L., Ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, 1969.
62. Mears, D. R.; Pae, K. D. Polym. Lett. 1969, 7, 349
63. Gent, A. N. J. Mater. Sci. 1970, 5, 925
64. Pugh, H.; Chandler, E. F.; Holliday, L.; Mann, J. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1971, 11, 463
65. Bhateja, S. K.; Pae, K. D. Polym. Lett. 1972, 10, 531
66. Gruenwald, G. Mod. Plast. 1960, 37, 137
67. Ender, D. H.; Andrews, R. D. J. Appl. Phys. 1965, 36, 3057
68. Bucknall, C. B. Toughened Plastics; Applied Science Publications: London, 1977.
69. Tanabe, Y.; Kanetsuna, H. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1978, 22, 1619
70. Broutman, L. J.; McGarry, F. J. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1965, 9, 609
71. White, E. F. T.; Murphy, B. M.; Haward, R. N. J. Polym. Sci., Part B 1969, 7, 157
72. Curtis, J. W. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1970, 3, 1413
73. Rettingaaa, W. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1975, 253, 852
74. Jones, T. T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1976, 45, 39
75. Gotham, K. V.; Scrutton, I. N. Polymer 1978, 19, 341
76. Puttick, K. E. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1978, II, 69
77. Farrar, N. R.; Kramer, E. J. Polymer 1981, 22, 691: "it appears that the anisotropy of fracture properties in oriented polymeric glasses may have its origin in differences in the microstructure and mechanical properties of crazes formed at various directions relative to the orientation direction in the glass"
78. van Melick, H. G. H.; Govaert, L. E.; Raas, B.; Nauta, W. J.; Meijer, H. E. H. Polymer 2003, 44, 1171
79. Hsiao, C. C.; Sauer, J. A. J. Appl. Phys. 1950, 21, 1071
80. Tanabe, Y.; Kanetsuna, H. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1978, 22, 2707
81. Beardmore, P.; Rabinowitz, S. J. Mater. Sci. 1975, 10, 1763
82. Harris, J. S.; Ward, I. M. J. Mater. Sci. 1970, 5, 573
83. Thomas, L. S.; Cleereman, K. J. SPE J. 1972, 28, 61
84. Weon, J. I.; Creasy, T. S.; Sue, H. J.; Hseih, A. J. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2005, 45, 314
85. It is important to recognize that Figure 1b shows a relatively uniform primary structure. In reality, there may be structural heterogeneity leading to dynamic clustering. In other words, some chains may be packed closer to one another than others. There is even a suggestion of small scale nematic ordering leading to the so-called cohesional entanglement: Qian, R.; Wu, L.; Shen, D.; Napper, D. H.; Mann, R. A.; Sangster, D. F. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 2950
86. In any event, the intermolecular interactions are not expected to be completely uniform. Actually, the idea of dynamic heterogeneity is popular in the literature. For a review, see: Ediger, M. D. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2000, 51, 99
87. Computer simulations have revealed mechanical heterogeneities as shown by: Yoshimoto, K.; Jain, T. S.; Workum, K. V.; Nealey, P. F.; de Pablo, J. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 175501
88. Riggleman, R. A.; Douglas, J. F.; de Pablo, J. J. Soft Matter 2010, 6, 292
89. de Gennes, P. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 55, 572
90. Stokes, V. K.; Bushko, W. C. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1995, 35, 291
91. There is strong evidence that the segmental mobility in the necked (i.e., yielded) region is much higher than that in the non-necked region. See: Lee, H.; Paeng, K.; Swallen, S. F.; Ediger, M. D. Science 2009, 323, 231. The information from this paper supports the idea that the primary structure has broken in the event of necking. It showed that the segmental mobility is much lower in the unyielded part of the uniaxially extended PMMA where the primary structure is still intact
92. Davide, S. A.; De Focatiis, J. E.; Buckley, P. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2010, 48, 1449
93. Wang, Y. Y.; Wang, S. Q. J. Rheol. 2008, 52, 1275
94. Wang, Y. Y.; Wang, S. Q. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 5427
95. Wang, S. Q.; Ravindranath, S.; Wang, Y. Y.; Boukany, P. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 064903
96. Boue, F.; Nierlich, M.; Jannink, G.; Ball, R. J. Phys. (Paris) 1982, 43, 137
97. ∞ l
98. Wu, S. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1992, 46, 619
99. Fetters, L. J.; Lohse, D. J.; Colby, R. H. Chain Dimensions and Entanglement Spacings. In Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook; Mark, J. E., Ed.; Springer: New York, 2006.