Inducibility of chemical defenses in Norway spruce bark is correlated with unsuccessful mass attacks by the spruce bark beetle

Oecologia

Volumn 170, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 183-198

  Schiebe, Christian ^a   Hammerbacher, Almuth ^b   Birgersson, Göran ^a   Witzell, Johanna ^a   Brodelius, Peter E ^d   Gershenzon, Jonathan ^b   Hansson, Bill S ^b   Krokene, Paal ^c   Schlyter, Fredrik ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL ECOLOGY   (Germany)

^c NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF BIOECONOMY RESEARCH   (Norway)

^d LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Alkaloids; Mass attack; Phenolics; Resistance; Terpenes

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; PHENOL DERIVATIVE; PHEROMONE; TERPENE;

AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR; ALKALOID; BARK; BEETLE; BIOMARKER; CHEMICAL DEFENSE; COLONIZATION; CORRELATION; DECIDUOUS FOREST; PHENOLIC COMPOUND; SEX PHEROMONE; TERPENE;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BARK; BEETLE; CHEMISTRY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HERBIVORY; METABOLISM; PLANT; SPRUCE; SURVIVAL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BEETLES; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; HERBIVORY; PHENOLS; PHEROMONES; PICEA; PLANT BARK; PLANTS, EDIBLE; SURVIVAL; TERPENES;

ABIES; COLEOPTERA; IPS TYPOGRAPHUS; PICEA; PICEA ABIES; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 84865598477     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2298-8     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andersson MN, Larsson MC, Schlyter F (2009) Specificity and redundancy in the olfactory system of the bark beetle Ips typographus: single-cell responses to ecologically relevant odors. J Insect Physiol 55: 556-567.
2. Andersson MN, Larsson MC, Blazenec M, Jakus R, Zhang Q-H, Schlyter F (2010) Peripheral modulation of pheromone response by inhibitory host compound in a beetle. J Exp Biol 213: 3332-3339.
3. Baier P, Bader R, Rosner S (1999) Monoterpene content and monoterpene emission of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) bark in relation to primary attraction of bark beetles (Col, Scolytidae). In: Lieutier F, Mattson WJ, Wagner MR (eds.) Physiology and genetics of tree-phytophage interactions, vol 90. Les Colloques de l'INRA, Gujan (France), pp 249-259.
4. Berryman AA, Dennis B, Raffa KF, Stenseth NC (1985) Evolution of optimal group attack, with particular reference to bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecology 66: 898-903.
5. Birgersson G, Schlyter F, Löfqvist J, Bergström G (1984) Quantitative variation of pheromone components in the Spruce bark beetle Ips typographus from different attack phases. J Chem Ecol 10: 1029-1055.
6. Boone CK, Aukema BH, Bohlmann J, Carroll AL, Raffa KF (2011) Efficacy of tree defense physiology varies with bark beetle population density: a basis for positive feedback in eruptive species. Can J For Res 41: 1174-1188.
7. Brignolas F, Lacroix B, Lieutier F, Sauvard D, Drouet A, Claudot AC, Yart A, Berryman AA, Christiansen E (1995) Induced responses in phenolic metabolism in two Norway spruce clones after wounding and inoculations with Ophiostoma polonicum, a bark beetle-associated fungus. Plant Physiol 109: 821-827.
8. Byers JA (1996) An encounter rate model of bark beetle populations searching at random for susceptible host trees. Ecol Model 91: 57-66.
9. El-Sayed A (2010) The Pherobase: Database of insect pheromones and semiochemicals. In: www. pherobase. com, vol 2009. © 2003-2010 The Pherobase.
10. Enander G, Svensson L (2007) 3: e rapport. In: Skogsstyrelsens rapport om utvecklingen och bekämpningen av skadeinsekter a °r 2007. Swedish Forest Agency.
11. Erbilgin N, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Zeneli G, Gershenzon J (2006) Exogenous application of methyl jasmonate elicits defenses in Norway spruce (Picea abies) and reduces host colonization by the bark beetle Ips typographus. Oecologia 148: 426-436.
12. Faccoli M, Schlyter F (2007) Conifer phenolic resistance markers are bark beetle antifeedant semiochemicals. Agric For Entomol 9: 237-245.
13. Faccoli M, Blazenec M, Schlyter F (2005) Feeding response to host and non-host compounds by males and females of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in a tunneling micro assay. J Chem Ecol 31: 745-759.
14. Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T (2005) Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol 167: 353-375.
15. Hedgren PO, Schroeder LM (2004) Reproductive success of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) and occurrence of associated species: a comparison between standing beetle-killed trees and cut trees. For Ecol Manag 203: 241-250.
16. Jakuš R (1998) Types of bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) infestation in spruce forest stands affected by air pollution, bark beetle outbreak and honey fungus (Armillaria mellea). Anz Schädlingsk 71: 41-49.
17. Kamm CD, Tawara JN, Stermitz FR (1998) Spruce budworm larval processing of piperidine alkaloids from spruce needles. J Chem Ecol 24: 1153-1160.
18. Kopper BJ, Illman BL, Kersten PJ, Klepzig KD, Raffa KF (2005) Effects of diterpene acids on components of a conifer bark beetle fungal interaction: tolerance by Ips pini and sensitivity by its associate Ophiostoma ips. Environ Entomol 34: 486-493.
19. Krokene P, Nagy NE, Solheim H (2008) Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: anatomically based defense responses and increased resistance against fungal infection. Tree Physiol 28: 29-35.
20. Kurz WA, Dymond CC, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Neilson ET, Carroll AL, Ebata T, Safranyik L (2008) Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 452: 987-990.
21. Långström B, Lindelöw Å, Schroeder LM, Björklund N, Öhrn P (2009) The spruce bark beetle outbreak in Sweden following the January-storms in 2005 and 2007. In: Epsilon Open Archive: http://pub-epsilon.Slu.se:8080/2076/01/langstrom_b_etal_100823.pdf Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
22. Latta RG, Linhart YB, Lundquist L, Snyder MA (2000) Patterns of monoterpene variation within individual trees in Ponderosa pine. J Chem Ecol 26: 1341-1357.
23. Lieutier F (2004) Host resistance to bark beetles and its variations. In: Fea Lieutier (ed) Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 135-180.
24. Moeck HA, Wood DL, Lindahl KQ (1981) Host selection behavior of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacking Pinus ponderosa, with special emphasis on the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis. J Chem Ecol 7: 49-83.
25. Mulock P, Christiansen E (1986) The threshold of successful attack by Ips typographus on Picea abies: a field experiment. For Ecol Manag 14: 125-132.
26. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82: 591-605.
27. Raffa KF (2001) Mixed messages across multiple trophic levels: the ecology of bark beetle chemical communication systems. Chemoecology 11: 49-65.
28. Raffa KF, Berryman A (1982) Physiological differences between lodgepole pines resistant and susceptible to the mountain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. Environ Entomol 11: 486-492.
29. Raffa KF, Berryman AA (1987) Interacting selective pressures in conifer-bark beetle systems: a basis for reciprocal adaptations? Am Nat 129: 234-262.
30. Raffa KF, Smalley EB (1995) Interaction of pre-attack and induced monoterpene concentrations in host conifer defense against bark beetle-fungal complexes. Oecologia 102: 285-295.
31. Reddemann J, Schopf R (1996) The importance of monoterpenes in the aggregation of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae: Ipinae). Entomol Gen 21: 69-80.
32. Reid ML, Robb T (1999) Death of vigorous trees benefits bark beetles. Oecologia 120: 555-562.
33. Schlyter F (1992) Sampling range, attraction range, and effective attraction radius: estimates of trap efficiency and communication distance in coleopteran pheromone and host attractant systems. J Appl Entomol 114: 439-454.
34. Schlyter F, Anderbrant O (1989) Mass attack of trees by Ips typographus induced by sex-specific pheromone: a model of attack dynamics. Ecography 12: 415-426.
35. Schlyter F, Birgersson G (1999) Forest beetles. In: Hardie J, Minks AK (eds) Pheromones in non-lepidopteran insects associated with agricultural plants. CAB International, Oxford, pp 113-148.
36. Schneider MJ, Montali JA, Hazen D, Stanton CE (1991) Alkaloids of Picea. J Nat Prod 54: 905-909.
37. Stermitz FR, Kamm CD, Tawara JN (2000) Piperidine alkaloids of spruce (Picea) and fir (Abies) species. Biochem Syst Ecol 28: 177-181.
38. Wallin KF, Raffa KF (2000) Influences of host chemicals and internal physiology on the multiple steps of postlanding host acceptance behavior of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ Entomol 29: 442-453.
39. Wallin KF, Raffa KF (2004) Feedback between individual host selection behavior and population dynamics in an eruptive herbivore. Ecol Monogr 74: 101-116.
40. Wermelinger B (2004) Ecology and management of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus-a review of resent research. For Ecol Manag 202: 67-82.
41. Wichmann L, Ravn HP (2001) The spread of Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) attacks following heavy windthrow in Denmark, analysed using GIS. For Ecol Manag 148: 31-39.
42. Zhang Q-H, Schlyter F (2004) Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles. Agric For Entomol 6: 1-19.
43. Zhao T, Borg-Karlson A-K, Erbilgin N, Krokene P (2011a) Host resistance elicited by methyl jasmonate reduces emission of aggregation pheromones by the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. Oecologia 167: 691-699.
44. Zhao T, Krokene P, Hu J, Christiansen E, Björklund N, Långström B, Solheim H, Borg-Karlson A-K (2011b) Induced terpene accumulation in Norway spruce inhibits bark beetle colonization in a dose-dependent manner. PLoS ONE 6: e26649.