Conifer phenolic resistance markers are bark beetle antifeedant semiochemicals

Agricultural and Forest Entomology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 237-245

  Faccoli, Massimo ^a,b   Schlyter, Fredrik ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Catechin; Coleoptera; E conophthorin; ED50; Feeding; NHV; Resveratrol; Scolytidae; Spruce; Taxifolin

Indexed keywords

COLEOPTERA; CONIFEROPHYTA; FUNGI; HEXAPODA; IPS; IPS TYPOGRAPHUS; PICEA; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 34447531910     PISSN: 14619555     EISSN: 14619563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2007.00339.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ascher, K.R.S., Gurevitz, E., Renneh, S. Nemny, N.E 1975) The penetration of females of the fruit bark beetle Scolytus mediterraneus Eggers into antifeedant-treated twigs in laboratory tests. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 82, 378 383.
2. Baker, J.E. Norris, D.M 1967) A feeding stimulant for Scolytus multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) isolated from the bark of Ulmus americana. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 60, 1213 1215.
3. Bois, E. Lieutier, F 1997) Phenolic response of Scots pine clones to inoculation with Leptographium wingfieldii, a fungus associated with Tomicus piniperda. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 35, 819 825.
4. Bois, E., Lieutier, F. Yart, A 1997) Bioassays on Leptographium wingfieldii, a bark beetle associated fungus, with phenolic compounds of Scots pine phloem. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 105, 51 60.
5. Borden, J.H 1997) Disruption of semiochemical-mediated aggregation in bark beetles. Pheromone Research: New Directions (ed. by R. T. Cardé and A. K. Minks pp. 421 438. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York.
6. Brignolas, F 1995) Rôle des composés phénoliques dans l'efficacité de la réaction induite du liber de l'épicéa (Picea abies) à enrayer la progression d'Ophiostoma polonicum champignon associé au Scolytide Ips typographus. PhD Thesis, Université d'Orléans.
7. Brignolas, F., Lieutier, F., Sauvard, D., Christiansen, E. Berryman, A.A 1998) Phenolic predictors for Norway spruce resistance to the bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and an associated fungus, Ceratocystis polonica. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28, 720 728.
8. Brignolas, F., Lieutier, F., Sauvard, D., Yart, A., Drouet, A. Claudot, A.C 1995) Changes in soluble-phenol content of Norway-spruce (Picea abies) phloem in response to wounding and inoculation with Ophiostoma polonicum. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 25, 253 265.
9. Byers, J.A 2004) Chemical ecology of bark beetles in a complex olfactory landscape. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe: A Synthesis (ed. by F. Lieutier, K. R. Day, A. Battisti, J.-C. Grégoire and H. F. Evans pp. 89 134. Kluwer Academic Publishers, U.K.
10. Byers, J.A., Zhang, Q.H. Birgersson, G 2004) Avoidance of nonhost plants by a bark beetle, Pityogenes bidentatus, in a forest of odors. Naturwissenschaften, 91, 215 219.
11. Byers, J.A., Zhang, Q.H., Schlyter, F. Birgersson, G 1998) Volatiles from nonhost birch trees inhibit pheromone response in spruce bark beetles. Naturwissenschaften, 85, 557 561.
12. Campbell, M.M., Brunner, A.M., Jones, H.M. Strauss, S.H 2003) Forestry's fertile crescent: the application of biotechnology to forest trees. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 1, 141 154.
13. Chararas, C., Katoulas, M. Koutroumpas, A 1982) Feeding preference of Ruguloscolytus rugulosus bark beetle parasite of fruit trees. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie Des Sciences - Serie III, Sciences de la Vie, 294, 763 766.
14. Daniel, G., Vijayalakshmi, C.K., Raiiman, P.A. Prakasan, C.B 1997) Influence of plant biochemicals on the infestation of Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari). Insect Environment, 3, 73.
15. Dickens, J.C 1981) Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the bark beetle Ips typographus to potential pheromone components. Physiological Entomology, 6, 251 261.
16. Dickens, J.C., Billings, R.F. Payne, T.L 1992) Green leaf volatiles interrupt aggregation pheromone response in bark beetles infesting southern pines. Experientia, 48, 523 524.
17. Doskotch, R.W., Chatterji, S.K. Peacock, J.W 1970) Elm bark derived feeding stimulants for the smaller European elm bark beetle. Science, 167, 380 382.
18. Doskotch, R.W., Mikhail, A.A. Chatterji, S.K 1973) Structure of the water-soluble feeding stimulant for Scolytus multistriatus: a revision. Phytochemistry, 12, 1153 1155.
19. Elkinton, J.S., Wood, D.L. Browne, L.E 1981) Feeding and boring behavior of the bark beetle, Ips paraconfusus, in extracts of ponderosa pine phloem. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 7, 209 220.
20. Faccoli, M., Blaženec, M. Schlyter, F 2005) Feeding response to host and non-host compounds by males and females of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in a tunnelling microassay. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 31, 745 759.
21. Frazier, J.L. Chyb, S 1995) Use of feeding inhibitors in insect control. Regulatory Mechanisms in Insect Feeding (ed. by R. F. Chapman and G. DeBore pp. 1 42. Plenum Press, New York, New York.
22. Hart, J.H. Shrimpton, D.M 1979) Role of stilbenes in resistance of wood to decay. Phytopathology, 69, 1138 1143.
23. Kirisits, T 2004) Fungal associates of European bark beetles with special emphasis on the ophiostomatoid fungi. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe: A Synthesis (ed. by F. Lieutier, K. R. Day, A. Battisti, J.-C. Grégoire and H. F. Evans pp. 181 235. Kluwer Academic Publishers, U.K.
24. Klepzig, K.D. Schlyter, F 1999) Laboratory evaluation of plant derived antifeedants against European pine weevil, Hylobius abietis. Journal of Economic Entomology, 92, 644 650.
25. Koul, O.B.K 1993) Plant allelochemicals and insect control: an antifeedant approach. Chemical Ecology of Phytophagous Insects (ed. by T. N. Ananthakrishnan, A. Raman and N. H. Lebanon pp. 51 80. International Science Publisher, New York, New York.
26. Levy, E.C., Ishaaya, I., Gurevitz, E., Cooper, R. Lavie, D 1974) Isolation and identification of host compounds eliciting attraction and bite stimuli in the fruit tree bark beetle, Scolytus mediterraneus. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 22, 376 379.
27. Lieutier, F 2004) Host resistance to bark beetles and its variations. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe: A Synthesis (ed. by F. Lieutier, K. R. Day, A. Battisti, J.-C. Grégoire and H. F. Evans pp. 135 180. Kluwer Academic Publishers, U.K.
28. Lieutier, F., Brignolas, F., Sauvard, D., Yart, A., Galet, C., Brunet, M. van de Sype, H 2003) Intra- and inter-provenance variability in phloem phenols of Picea abies and relationship to a bark beetle-associated fungus. Tree Physiology, 23, 247 256.
29. Lieutier, F., Yart, A., Jay-Allemand, C. Delorme, L 1991) Preliminary investigations on phenolics as a response of Scots pine phloem to attacks by bark beetles and associated fungi. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 21, 354 364.
30. Meyer, H.J. Norris, D.M 1974) Lignin intermediates and simple phenolics as feeding stimulants for Scolytus multistriatus. Journal of Insect Physiology, 20, 2015 21.
31. Raffa, K.F. Berryman, A.A 1982) Gustatory cues in the orientation of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to host trees. Canadian Entomologist, 114, 97 104.
32. Rohde, M., Waldmann, R. Lunderstadt, J 1996) Induced defence reaction in the phloem of spruce (Picea abies) and larch (Larix decidua) after attack by Ips typographus and Ips cembrae. Forest Ecology and Management, 86, 51 59.
33. Schlyter, F. Birgersson, G 1999) Forest beetles. Pheromones of Non-Lepidopteran Insects Associated with Agricultural Plants (ed. by J. Hardie and A. K. Minks pp. 113 148. CAB International, U.K.
34. Schlyter, F. Cederholm, I 1981) Separation of the sexes of living spruce bark beetles, Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 92, 42 47.
35. TATRY (2001) Integrated risk assessment and new pest management technology in ecosystems affected by forest decline and bark beetle outbreaks. Consolidated Final Report: 2.3.3 Tree Status by Biological and Chemical Indicators; 2.3.3.2 Phenolic Dynamics at Fungal Inoculation and Growth Indexes as Markers of Resistance [accessed 1 October 2006]. Available at http://www-vv.slu.se/fs/tatry/fin_rapp/FR_233.htm.
36. Thomas, H.A., Richmond, J.A. Bradley, E.L 1981) Bioassay of Pine Bark Extracts as Biting Stimulants for the Southern Pine Beetle. USDA Forest Service, Research Note SE-302. USDA, Asheville, NC.
37. Zar, J.H 1984) Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
38. Zhang, Q.-H. Schlyter, F 2003) Redundancy, synergism, and active inhibitory range of non-host volatiles in reducing pheromone attraction of European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus. Oikos, 101, 299 310.
39. Zhang, Q.-H. Schlyter, F 2004) Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 6, 1 19.
40. Zhang, Q.H., Schlyter, F. Birgersson, G 2000) Bark volatiles from nonhost angiosperm trees of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Chemical and electrophysiological analysis. Chemoecology, 10, 69 80.