Joint distraction results in clinical and structural improvement of haemophilic ankle arthropathy: A series of three cases

Haemophilia

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 810-817

  Van Meegeren, M E R ^a,b   Van Veghel, K ^a,b   De Kleijn, P ^b   Van Roermund, P M ^a   Biesma, D H ^b   Lafeber, F P J G ^a   Roosendaal, G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ankle; Arthropathy; Distraction; Haemophilia

Indexed keywords

ANKLE RADIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; EXTERNAL FIXATOR; HEMOPHILIA A; HEMOPHILIA B; HEMOPHILIC ANKLE ARTHROPATHY; HEMOPHILIC ARTHROPATHY; JOINT DISTRACTION; JOINT MOBILITY; JOINT SURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PETTERSSON SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAN VALBURG QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANKLE JOINT; EXTERNAL FIXATORS; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA A; HEMOPHILIA B; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 84865563550     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: 13652516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02805.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Fischer K, van der Bom JG, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, et al. Changes in treatment strategies for severe haemophilia over the last 3 decades: effects on clotting factor consumption and arthropathy. Haemophilia 2001; 7: 446-52.
2. Buzzard BM. Sports and hemophilia: antagonist or protagonist. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 328: 25-30.
3. Tiktinsky R, Kenet G, Dvir Z et al. Physical activity participation and bleeding characteristics in young patients with severe haemophilia. Haemophilia 2009; 15: 695-700.
4. Ribbans WJ, Phillips AM. Hemophilic ankle arthropathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 328: 39-45.
5. Pasta G, Forsyth A, Merchan CR et al. Orthopaedic management of haemophilia arthropathy of the ankle. Haemophilia 2008; 14: 170-6.
6. Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold J, Pontarelli W. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A: 219-28.
7. Tsailas PG, Wiedel JD. Arthrodesis of the ankle and subtalar joints in patients with haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2010; 16: 822-31.
8. Barg A, Elsner A, Hefti D, Hintermann B. Haemophilic arthropathy of the ankle treated by total ankle replacement: a case series. Haemophilia 2010; 16: 647-55.
9. Radossi P, Bisson R, Munari F et al. Total ankle replacement for end-stage arthropathy in patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2008; 14: 658-60.
10. van der Heide HJ, Novakova I, de Waal Malefijt MC. The feasibility of total ankle prosthesis for severe arthropathy in haemophilia and prothrombin deficiency. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 679-82.
11. SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 2143-9.
12. Marijnissen AC, Van Roermund PM, Van Melkebeek J et al. Clinical benefit of joint distraction in the treatment of severe osteoarthritis of the ankle: proof of concept in an open prospective study and in a randomized controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 2893-902.
13. Ploegmakers JJ, van Roermund PM, van Melkebeek J et al. Prolonged clinical benefit from joint distraction in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13: 582-8.
14. van Valburg AA, van Roermund PM, Lammens J et al. Can Ilizarov joint distraction delay the need for an arthrodesis of the ankle? A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 720-5.
15. van Valburg AA, van Roermund PM, Marijnissen AC et al. Joint distraction in treatment of osteoarthritis: a two-year follow-up of the ankle. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7: 474-9.
16. Intema F, Thomas TP, Anderson DD et al. Subchondral bone remodeling is related to clinical improvement after joint distraction in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19: 668-75.
17. Lafeber FP, Intema F, Van Roermund PM, Marijnissen AC. Unloading joints to treat osteoarthritis, including joint distraction. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006; 18: 519-25.
18. van Valburg AA, van Roermund PM, Marijnissen AC et al. Joint distraction in treatment of osteoarthritis (II): effects on cartilage in a canine model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000; 8: 1-8.
19. van Genderen FR, Westers P, Heijnen L et al. Measuring patients' perceptions on their functional abilities: validation of the Haemophilia Activities List. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 36-46.
20. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, de Groot IJ. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 210-6.
21. Sibley A, Kersten P, Ward CD, White B, Mehta R, George S. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: Validation of a new scale in a UK population. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 793-803.
22. Pettersson H, Ahlberg A, Nilsson IM. A radiologic classification of hemophilic arthropathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 149: 153-9.
23. Marijnissen AC, Vincken KL, Viergever MA et al. Ankle images digital analysis (AIDA): digital measurement of joint space width and subchondral sclerosis on standard radiographs. Osteoarthr Cartil 2001; 9: 264-72.
24. Lundin B, Babyn P, Doria AS, et al. Compatible scales for progressive and additive MRI assessments of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 109-15.
25. Roosendaal G, van Rinsum AC, Vianen ME, van den Berg HM, Lafeber FP, Bijlsma JW. Haemophilic arthropathy resembles degenerative rather than inflammatory joint disease. Histopathology 1999; 34: 144-53.
26. Tanaka Y, Shinohara Y, Narikawa K, et al. Arthroscopic synovectomies combined with reduced weight-bearing using patella tendon-bearing braces were very effective for progressed haemophilic ankle arthropathy in three paediatric patients. Haemophilia 2009; 15: 833-6.
27. Razmjou H, Yee A, Ford M, Finkelstein JA. Response shift in outcome assessment in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 2590-5.
28. Soucie JM, Wang C, Forsyth A, et al. Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies. Haemophilia 2011; 17: 500-7.
29. Sinitski EH, Hansen AH, Wilken JM. Biomechanics of the ankle-foot system during stair ambulation: Implications for design of advanced ankle-foot prostheses. J Biomech 2011; 45: 588-94.