Psychometric properties of the Confidence and Trust in Delivery Questionnaire (CTDQ): a pilot study

BMC Women's Health

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Jeschke, Elke ^a   Ostermann, Thomas ^b   Dippong, Natalie ^a   Brauer, Dagmar ^a   Matthes, Harald ^a  

^a Havelhoehe Research Institute   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Confidence; Delivery; Questionnaire; Trust; Validation study

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE AND TRUST IN DELIVERY QUESTIONNAIRE; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; PILOT STUDY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SELF REPORT; SENSE OF COHERENCE; VALIDATION STUDY; VARIMAX ROTATION;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PARTURITION; PILOT PROJECTS; PREGNANCY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF EFFICACY; SELF REPORT; SPOUSES; TRUST;

EID: 84865545138     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726874     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-26     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Capogna G, Alahuhtat S, Celleno D, De Vlieger H, Moreira J, Morgan B, Moore C, Pasqualetti P, Soetens M, Van Zundertl A, et al. Maternal expectations and experiences of labour pain and analgesia: a multicentre study of nulliparous women. Int J Obstet Anesth 1996, 5(4):229-235. 10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80042-2, 15321321.
2. Buchi S, Cignacco E, Luthi D, Spirig R. Needs and expectations of Tamil women attending an antenatal care department at a Swiss university hospital. Pflege 2006, 19(5):295-302. 10.1024/1012-5302.19.5.295, 17051515.
3. Oweis A, Abushaikha L. Jordanian pregnant women's expectations of their first childbirth experience. Int J Nurs Pract 2004, 10(6):264-271. 10.1111/j.1440-172x.2004.00488.x, 15544582.
4. Kao BC, Gau ML, Wu SF, Kuo BJ, Lee TY. A comparative study of expectant parents ' childbirth expectations. J Nurs Res 2004, 12(3):191-202. 10.1097/01.JNR.0000387503.21749.0d, 15362011.
5. Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 186(5 Suppl Nature):S160-S172.
6. Corbin JM. Women's perceptions and management of a pregnancy complicated by chronic illness. Health Care Women Int 1987, 8(5-6):317-337.
7. Gupton A, Beaton J, Sloan J, Bramadat I. The development of a scale to measure childbirth expectations. Can J Nurs Res 1991, 23(2):35-47.
8. Wijma K, Wijma B, Zar M. Psychometric aspects of the W-DEQ; a new questionnaire for the measurement of fear of childbirth. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1998, 19(2):84-97. 10.3109/01674829809048501, 9638601.
9. Lowe NK. Maternal confidence for labor: development of the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory. Res Nurs Health 1993, 16(2):141-149. 10.1002/nur.4770160209, 8502766.
10. Petersen JJ, Paulitsch MA, Guethlin C, Gensichen J, Jahn A. A survey on worries of pregnant women-testing the German version of the Cambridge worry scale. BMC Publ Health 2009, 9:490.
11. Hearnshaw H. Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. BMJ 2004, 328(7432):140-141. 10.1136/bmj.328.7432.140, 314507, 14726341.
12. Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med 1993, 36(6):725-733. 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-Z, 8480217.
13. Sjostrom H, Langius-Eklof A, Hjertberg R. Well-being and sense of coherence during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83(12):1112-1118.
14. Oz Y, Sarid O, Peleg R, Sheiner E. Sense of coherence predicts uncomplicated delivery: a prospective observational study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2009, 30(1):29-33. 10.1080/01674820802546196, 19308780.
15. Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R. Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Multivariate analysis methodes: an application-oriented introduction] 2006, Berlin: Springer, 11.
16. Antonovsky A. Unraveling the Mystery of Healthy; How People Manage Stress and Stay Well 1987, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 3262223, 22303391.
17. Guilford JP, Fruchter B. Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education 1973, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
18. Bramadat IJ, Driedger M. Satisfaction with childbirth: theories and methods of measurement. Birth 1993, 20(1):22-29. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1993.tb00175.x, 8503963.
19. Lally JE, Murtagh MJ, Macphail S, Thomson R. More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women's expectations and experience of pain relief in labour. BMC Med 2008, 6:7. 10.1186/1741-7015-6-7, 2358911, 18366632.
20. Gibbins J, Thomson AM. Women's expectations and experiences of childbirth. Midwifery 2001, 17(4):302-313. 10.1054/midw.2001.0263, 11749063.
21. Bussing A, Ostermann T, Raak C, Matthiessen PF. Adaptive coping strategies and attitudes toward health and healing in German homeopathy and acupuncture users. Explore (NY) 2010, 6(4):237-245.
22. Adams J, Lui CW, Sibbritt D, Broom A, Wardle J, Homer C, Beck S. Women's use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy: a critical review of the literature. Birth 2009, 36(3):237-245. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00328.x, 19747271.
23. Elmir R, Schmied V, Wilkes L, Jackson D. Women's perceptions and experiences of a traumatic birth: a meta-ethnography. J Adv Nurs 2010, 66(10):2142-2153. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05391.x, 20636467.
24. Eriksson M, Lindstrom B. Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005, 59(6):460-466. 10.1136/jech.2003.018085, 1757043, 15911640.
25. Statistisches Bundesamt Bevölkerung - Geburten http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Content/Statistiken/Bevoelkerung/GeburtenSterbefaelle/Tabellen/Content75/GeburtenMutteralter.psml, Statistisches Bundesamt.