Genotype by Environment Interactions in Commercial Populations

Environmental Physiology of Livestock

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 289-307

  Misztal, Ignacy ^a   Lovendahl, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Artificial selection; Commercial populations; Creation of a line; G E, dynamic concept; Genetic, via progeny testing; Genotype by environment interaction (G E); Heat stress, three parities; National genetic evaluation; Phenotypic plasticity, homeostatis; Profit per genotype

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865513320     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781119949091.ch16     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Aguilar, I, I Misztal, and S Tsuruta. 2009. Genetic components of heat stress for dairy cattle with multiple lactations. J Dairy Sci. 92:5702-5711.
2. Aguilar, I, I Misztal, and S Tsuruta. 2010a. Short Communication: Genetic trends of milk yield under heat stress for U.S. Holsteins. J Dairy Sci. 93:1754-1758.
3. Aguilar, I, I Misztal, DL Johnson, A Legarra, S Tsuruta, and TJ Lawlor. 2010b. A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci. 93:743-752.
4. Bloemhof, S, EF Knol, A Kause, and I Misztal. 2010. Application of a crossbred model reveals additional genetic variation in reproduction traits of commercial females. J Anim Sci. 87(Suppl. 1):152.
5. Bohmanova, J, I Misztal, S Tsuruta, HD Norman, and TJ Lawlor. 2005. National Genetic Evaluation of Milk Yield for Heat Tolerance of United States Holsteins. Interbull Bull. 33:160-162.
6. Bohmanova, J, I Misztal, S Tsuruta, HD Norman, and TJ Lawlor. 2008. Heat Stress as a Factor in Genotype x Environment Interaction in U.S. Holsteins. J Dairy Sci. 91:840-846.
7. Bradshaw, AD. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advan Genet. 13:115-155.
8. Brouk, MJ, JP Harner, JF Smith, and DV Armstrong. 2007. Environmental modifications to address heat stress. J Dairy Sci. 90(Suppl. 1):624.
9. Buchanan, DS, and MK Nielsen. 1979. Sire x environment interactions in beef cattle field data. J Anim Sci. 48:307-312.
10. Caraviello, DZ, KA Weigel, PM Fricke, MC Wiltbank, MJ Florent, NB Cook, KV Nordlund, NR Zwald, and CL Rawson. 2006. Survey of management practices on reproductive performance of dairy cattle on large U.S. commercial farms. J Dairy Sci. 89:4723-4735.
11. Collier, RJ, DK Beede, WW Thatcher, LA Israel, and CJ Wilcox. 1982. Influences of environment and its modification on dairy animal health and production. J Dairy Sci. 65:2213- 2227.
12. Collier, RJ, JL Collier, RP Rhoads, and LH Baumgard. 2008. Invited Review: Genes involved in the bovine heat stress response. J Dairy Sci. 91:445-454.
13. Costa, CN, RW Blake, EJ Pollak, PA Oltenacu, RL Quaas, and SR Searle. 2000. Genetic analysis of Holstein cattle populations in Brazil and the United States. J Dairy Sci. 83:2963- 2974.
14. Dechow, CD, and RC Goodling. 2008. Mortality, culling by sixty days in milk, and production profiles in high- and low-survival Pennsylvania herds. J Dairy Sci. 91:4630-4639.
15. de Jong, G. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity as a product of selection in a variable environment. Am Nat. 145:493-512.
16. de Mattos, D, JK Bertrand, and I Misztal. 2000. Investigation of genotype x environment interactions for weaning weight for Herefords in three countries. J Anim Sci. 78:2121-2126.
17. de Vries, A, R Giesy, L Ely, B Broaddus, C Vann, and B Butler. 2005. Dairy Business Analysis Project: 2003 Financial Summary. Univ Florida Ext Publ. DS178. Retrieved from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/DS178.
18. Eitan, Y, and M Soller. 2002. Associated effects of sixty years of commercial selection for juvenile growth rate in broiler chickens: Endo/exophysiological or genetic? Proc. 7thWorld Cong Genet Appl Livest Prod. Montpellier, France. 19:10.
19. Falconer, DS. 1952. The problem of environment and selection. Amer Natur. 86(830):293-298.
20. Falconer, DS. 1990. Selection in different environments: Effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. Genet Res. 56:57-70.
21. Falconer, DS and TFC Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Essex, UK: Longman Group.
22. Field, TG, and FE Hagan. 2007. Beef Production Management and Decisions (5th edition). Prentice Hall. 682pp.
23. Flamenbaum, I, and E Ezra. 2007. The "summer to winter performance ratio" as a tool for evaluating heat stress relief efficiency of dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 90(Suppl. 1):605-606.
24. Frankham, R. 2008. Genetic Architecture of Reproductive Fitness and its Consequences. In van der Werf et al. (2008):15-40.
25. Freitas, MS, I Misztal, J Bohmanova, and J West. 2006. Utility of on- and off-farm weather records for studies in genetics of heat tolerance. Livest Sci. 105:223-228.
26. Freitas, M, I Misztal, J Bohmanova, and R Torres. 2006. Regional differences in heat stress in U.S. Holsteins. Proc. 8th World Cong Gen Appl Livest Prod. Belo Horizonte, Brazil. CD-ROM communication 01-11.
27. Hayes, BJ, M Carrick, P Bowman, and ME Goddard. 2003. Genotype × environment interaction for milk production of daughters of Australian dairy sires from test-day records. J Dairy Sci. 86:3736-3744.
28. Hayes, BJ, PJ Bowman, AJ Chamberlain, and ME Goddard. 2009. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci. 92:433-443.
29. Her, E, D Wolfenson, I Flamenbaum, Y Folman, M Kaim, and A Berman. 1988. Thermal, productive, and reproductive responses of high yielding cows exposed to short-term cooling in summer. J Dairy Sci. 71:1085-1092.
30. Huang, C, S Tsuruta, JK Bertrand, I Misztal, TJ Lawlor, and JS Clay. 2009. Trends for conception rate of Holsteins over time in Southeastern USA. J Dairy Sci. 92:4641-4647.
31. James, JW. 2008. Genotype by environment interactions in farm animals. In van derWerf et al. 2008:151-167.
32. Kadzere, CT, MR Murphy, MR, N Silanikove, and E Maltz. 2002. Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: a review. Livest Prod Sci. 77(1):59-91.
33. Kolmodin, R, E Strandberg, PMadsen, J Jensen, andHJorjani. 2002. Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied using reaction norms. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 52:11-24.
34. Kolmodin R, E Strandberg, H Jorjani, and B Danell. 2003. Selection in the presence of genotype by environmental interaction: response in environmental sensitivity. Anim Sci. 76:375-385.
35. Lawlor, TJ, I Misztal, S Tsuruta, and CH Huang. 2006. Breeding Holsteins for different environments. Proc 8th World Cong Gen Appl Livest Prod. Belo Horizonte, Brazil. CDROM communication 01-35.
36. Legarra, A, JK Bertrand, T Strabel, RL Sapp, JP Sanchez, and I Misztal. 2007. Multi-breed genetic evaluation in a Gelbvieh population. J Anim Breed Genet. 124:286-295.
37. Lillehammer, M, BJ Hayes, THE Meuwissen, and ME Goddard. 2009. Gene by environment interactions for production traits in Australian dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 92:4008-4017.
38. Lo, LL, RL Fernando, RJC Cantet, and M Grossman. 1995. Theory for modelling means and covariances in a two-breed population with dominance inheritance. Theor Appl Genet. 90:49-62.
39. Lo, LL, RL Fernando, and M Grossman. 1997. Genetic evaluation by BLUP in two-breed terminal crossbreeding systems under dominance. J Anim Sci. 75:2877-2884.
40. Lutaaya, E, IMisztal, JW Mabry, T Short,HTimm and R Holzabauer. 2001. Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model. J Anim Sci. 3002:3007.
41. Madalena, FE. 2008. How sustainable are the breeding programs of the global main-stream dairy breeds? The Latin-American situation. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 20, Article #19. Retrieved from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/2/mada20019.htm.
42. McDowell, RE, JC Wilk, and CW Talbott. 1996. Economic viability of crosses of Bos taurus and Bos indicus for dairying in warm climates. J Dairy Sci. 79:1292-303.
43. Meuwissen, THE, BJ Hayes, and ME Goddard. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 157:1819-1829.
44. Muir, WM, and SE Aggrey. 2003. Poultry Genetics Breeding and Biotechnology. Cabi, Oxfordshire, UK. 720pp.
45. Muir, WM. 2007. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet. 124(6):342-355.
46. Ojango, JMG, and GE Pollott. 2002. The relationship between Holstein bull breeding values for milk yield derived in both the UK and Kenya. Livest Prod Sci. 74:1-12.
47. Oseni, S, I Misztal, S Tsuruta, and R Rekaya. 2004. Genetic components of days open under heat stress. J Dairy Sci. 87:3022-3028.
48. Pigliucci, M. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
49. Pollak, EJ, and RL Quaas. 1998. Multi-breed genetic evaluations in beef cattle. Proc 6thWorld Cong Genet Appl Livest. 23:81-88.
50. Pszczola, M, I Aguilar, and IMisztal. 2009. ShortCommunication: Trends for monthly changes in days open in Holsteins. J Dairy Sci. 92:4689-4696.
51. Rauw, WM, E Kanis, EN Noordhuizen-Stassen, and FJ Grommers. 1998. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals. A review. Livest Prod Sci. 56:15-33.
52. Ravagnolo, O, and IMisztal. 2000. Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle-parameter estimation. J Dairy Sci. 83:2126-2130.
53. Ravagnolo, O, and IMisztal. 2002. Effect of heat stress on nonreturn rate in Holsteins: Genetic analysis. J Dairy Sci. 85:3101-3106.
54. Rekaya, R, KAWeigel, and D Gianola. 2003. Bayesian estimation of parameters of a structural model for genetic covariances between milk yield in five regions of the United States. JDairy Sci. 86:1837-1844.
55. Rothschild, MF, and A Ruvinsky, editors. 1998. The genetics of the pig. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
56. Rutledge, JJ. 2001. Greek temples, tropical kine and recombination load. Livest Prod Sci. 68:171-179.
57. Śanchez, JP, I Misztal, I Aguilar, B Zumbach, and R Rekaya. 2009. Genetic determination of the onset of heat stress on daily milk production in the US Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci. 92:4035-4045.
58. Schaeffer, LR. 2004. Application of random regression models in animal breeding. Livest Prod Sci. 86:35-45.
59. Schaeffer, LR. 2006. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet. 123(4):218-223.
60. Schlichting, C, and M Pigliucci. 1998. Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
61. St-Pierre, NR, B Cobanov, and G Schnitkey. 2003. Economic losses from heat stress by U.S. livestock industries. J Dairy Sci. 86(E Suppl.):E52-E77.
62. Strandberg, E,RKolmodin, PMadsen, J Jensen, andHJorjani. 2000. Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied by use of reaction norms. Interbull Bull. 25:41-45.
63. Su, G, PMadsen, MS Lund, D Sorensen, IR Korsgaard, and J Jensen. 2006. Bayesian analysis of the linear reaction norm model with unknown covariates. J Anim Sci. 84:1651-1657.
64. Tyler, HD, and ME Ensminger. 2005. Dairy Cattle Science (5th edition). NJ: Prentice Hall. 432pp.
65. van der Waaij, EH. 2004. A resource allocation model describing consequences of artificial selection under metabolic stress. J Anim Sci. 82:973-981.
66. van der Werf, J, HU Graser, R Frankham, and C Gondro, editors. 2008. Adaptation and Fitness in Animal Populations. Evolutionary and Breeding Perspectives on Genetic Resource Management. Springer.
67. VanRaden, PM. 2008. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 91:4414-4423.
68. VanRaden, PM, CP Van Tassell, GR Wiggans, TS Sonstegard, RD Schnabel, JF Taylor, and FS Schenkel. 2009. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci. 92:16-24.
69. Veerkamp, RF, HA Mulder, MPL Calus, JJWindig, and J ten Napel. 2009. Statistical genetics to improve robustness of dairy cows. Proc 18th Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Barossa Valley, Australia.
70. Waddington, CH. 1942. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature. 150:563-565.
71. Wei, M, and JHJ van der Werf. 1994. Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information. Anim Prod. 58:401-413.
72. West, JW. 2003. Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 86:2131-2144.
73. Yan, T, CS Maine, TW Keady, and RE Agnew. 2006. Effects of dairy cow genotype with two planes of nutrition on energy partitioning between milk and body issue. J Dairy Sci. 89:1031-1042.
74. Zumbach, B, I Misztal, S Tsuruta, JP Sanchez, M Azain, W Herring, J Holl, T Long, and M Culbertson. 2008. Genetic components of heat stress in finishing pigs: Parameter estimation. J Anim Sci. 86:2076-2081.
75. Zwald, NR, KA Weigel, WF Fikse, and R Rekaya. 2003. Identification of factors that cause genotype by environment interaction between herds of Holstein cattle in seventeen countries. J Dairy Sci. 86:1009-1018.