Cultural implications of collaborative information technologies (CITs) in international online collaborations and global virtual teams

Handbook of Research on Virtual Workplaces and the New Nature of Business Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 120-136

  Olaniran, Bolanle A ^a   Edgell, David A ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865457328     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-893-2.ch010     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Armstrong, D., & Cole, P. (2002). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In: P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 167-186).
2. Bajwa, D., Lewis, L., Pervan, G., & Lai, V. (2005). The adoption and use of collaboration information technologies: International comparisons. Journal of Information Technology, 20, 130-140.
3. Bal, J., & Foster, P. (2000). Managing the virtual team and controlling effectiveness. International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4019-4032.
4. Barron, T. (2000). E-learning's global migration. Retrieved on August 26 2005 from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2000/Sep2000/barron.html.
5. Bostrom, R., Kadlec, C., & Thomas, D. (2003). Implementation and use of collaboration technol ogy in e-learning: The case of a joint universitycorporate MBA. In: B. Munkvold (Ed.), Implementing collaboration technologies in industry: Case examples and lesson learned (pp. 211-245). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
6. Carleta, J., Anderson, A., & McEwan, R. (2000). The effects of multimedia communication technology on non-collocated teams: A case study. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1237-1251.
7. Chang, T. (2004). Transborder tourism, borderless classroom: Reflections on a Hawaii-Singapore experience. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28(2), 179-195.
8. Cogburn, D., & Levinson, N. (2003). U.S.-Africa virtual collaboration in globalization studies: Success factors for complex cross-national learning teams. International Studies Perspectives, 4, 34-52.
9. Connolly, T., Jessup, L., & Valacich, J. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 97-120.
10. Crampton, C. (2002). Attribution in distributed work groups. In: P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 191-212).
11. nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12. Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
13. Daft, R., Lengel, R., & Trevino, L. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. Management Information System Quarterly, 11, 355-366.
14. Davidson, R., & Vreede, G. (2001). The global application of collaborative technologies. Com munication of the ACM, 44(12), 69-70.
15. Dennis, A., & Kinney, S. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256-274.
16. Desanctis, G., & Poole, M. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adapative structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
17. Desanctis, G., Wright, M., & Jiang, L. (2001). Building a global learning community. Communications of the ACM, 44(12), 80-82.
18. Dube, L., & Pare, G. (2001). Global virtual teams. Communications of the ACM, 44(12), 71-73.
19. Ess, C., & Sudweeks, F. (2005). Culture and computer-mediated communication: Toward new understandings. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1). Retrieved August 26, 2005 from Http://jcmc.indiana.edu/voll11/issue1/ess.html.
20. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In: J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Garton, L., & Wellman, B. (1995). Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of the research literature. In: B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, 18, 434-453. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Gimenez, J. (2002). New media and conflicting realities in multinational corporate communication: A case study. IRAL, 40, 323-343.
23. Gezo, T., Oliverson, M., & Zick, M. (2000). Managing global projects with virtual teams. Hydrocarbon Processing, 79, 112c-112I.
24. Hargis, J. (2005). Collaboration, community project-based learning: Does it still work online?. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(2), 157-161.
25. Hiltz, S., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiment in group decision making communication process and outcome in face to face vs. computerized conference. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
26. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Hofstede, G. (1996). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: Mcgraw Hill.
28. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Holton, J. (2001). Building trust and collaboration in a virtual team. Team Performance Management, 7(3-4), 36-47.
30. Hsieh, Y., Hsieh, C., & Lehman, J. (2003). Chinese ethics in communication, collaboration, and digitalization in the digital age. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 18(3-4), 268-285.
31. James, M., & Ward, K. (2001). Leading a multinational team of change agents of Glaxo Wellcome. Journal of Change Management, 2(2), 148-159.
32. Jarvenpaa, S., & Leidner, D. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organizational Science, 10, 791-815.
33. Kayman, M. (2004). The state of English as a global language: Communicating culture. Textual Practice, 18(1), 1-22.
34. Kawachi, P. (1999). When the sun doesn't rise: Empirical findings that explain the exclusion of Japanese from online global education. Retrieved August 26, 2005 from http://www.ignou.ac.in/Theme-3/Paul%20%20KAWACHI.html.
35. Keenan, E., & Ante, S. (2002). The new teamwork. Business Week, EB 12-16.
36. Kiser, K. (1999,). Working on world time. Training, 36(3), 28-34.
37. Lee, O. (2002). Cultural differences in e-mail use of virtual teams a critical social theory perspective. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(3), 227-232.
38. Lewis, R. (2000). When cultures collide: Managing successfully across cultures. London: Nicholas Brealy Publishing.
39. Massey, A., Montoya-Weiss, M., Hung, C., & Ramesh, V. (2001). Cultural perceptions of task-technology fit. Communications of the ACM, 44(12), 83-84.
40. Maybury, M. (2001). Collaborative virtual environments for analysis and decision support. Communication of the ACM, 44(12), 51-54.
41. McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede's model of national cultural difference and their consequences: A triumph of faith - a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89-117.
42. Munkvold, E. (2005). Experiences from global e-collaboration: Contextual influences on technology adoption and use. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(1), 78-86.
43. Olaniran, B. (1994). Group performance and computer-mediated communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 256-281.
44. Olaniran, B. (1995). Perceived communication outcomes in computer-mediated communication: An analyses of three systems among new users. Information Processing and Management, 31, 525-541.
45. Olaniran, B. (1996). A model of Satisfaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Behavioural and Information Technology, 15, 24-36.
46. Olaniran, B. (2001b). The effects of computermediated communication on transculturalism. In: V. Milhouse, M. Asante, & P. Nwosu (Eds.), Transcultural realities (pp. 83-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Olaniran, B. (2001a). Computer-mediated communication and conflict management process: A closer look at anticipation of future interaction. World Futures, 57, 285-313.
48. Olaniran, B. (2004). Computer-mediated communication in cross-cultural virtual groups. In: G. Chen & W. Starosta (Ed.), Dialogue among diversities (pp. 142-166). Washington, D.C.: NCA.
49. Pauleen, D., & Yoong, P. (2001). Facilitating virtual team relationships via Internet and conventional communication channels. Journal of Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11(3), 190-202.
50. Qureshi, S., & Zigurs, I. (2001). Paradoxes and prerogatives in global virtual collaboration, Communications of the ACM, 44(12), 85-88.
51. Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1998). Interactivity on the nets. In: F. Sudweeks, M. McLaughlin, & S. Rafaeli (Eds.), Network and netplay: Virtual groups on the internet (pp.173-190). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Rao. S. (2004). The cultural vacuum in online disputes resolution. Retrieved July 11, 2006 from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/rao.htm.
53. Rice, R. (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3(4), 475-500.
54. Rice, R., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.
55. Roebuck, D., & Britt, A. (2002). Virtual teaming has come to stay: Guidelines and strategies for success. Southern Business Review, 28, 29-39.
56. Roy, M. (2001). Small group communication and performance: Do cognitive flexibility and context matter?. Management Decision, 39(4), 323-330.
57. Rutkowski, A., Vogel, D., Genuchten, M., & Bemelmans, T. (2002). Group support system and vitual collaboration: The HKNET project. Group Decision and Negotiation, 11, 101-125.
58. Rutkowski, A., Vogel, D., Genuchten, M., Bemelmans, T., & Favier, M. (2002). E-Collaboration: The reality of virtuality. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 45(4), 219-229.
59. Saidon, H., & Sitharan, R. (2004). The use of Internet for an international collaborative project. Leonarno Electronic Almanac, 12(8). http://mitpress2.mit.edu/e-journals/LEA/Text/Vol_12_n08.txt.
60. Smith, P. (2002). Culture's consequences: Something old and something new. Human Relations, 55(1), 119-135.
61. Solomon, C. (2001). Managing virtual teams. Workforce, 80(6), 60-65.
62. Spitzberg, B., & Cupach, W. (1989). Handbook of interpersonal competence research. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
63. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
64. Vroman, K., & Kovacich, J. (2002). Computermediated interdisciplinary teams: Theory and reality. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 16, 161-170.
65. Walther, J. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501. Organization Science, 6(2), 186-203.
66. Walther, J. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6(2), 196-203.
67. Walther J. (2002). Time effects in computermediated groups: Past, present, and future. In: P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 235-257).
68. Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2001). Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 371-390.