A coreference corpus and resolution system for Dutch

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 144-149

  Hendrickx, Iris ^a   Bouma, Gosse ^b   Coppens, Frederik ^c   Daelemans, Walter ^a   Hoste, Veronique ^a   Kloosterman, Geert ^b   Mineur, Anne Marie ^b   Van Der Vloet, Joeri ^c   Verschelde, Jean Luc ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c Language and Computing NV   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATION TOOL; CO-REFERENCE RESOLUTIONS; CROSS VALIDATION; GOLD STANDARDS; MEDICAL DOMAINS; QUESTION ANSWERING; RELATION INFORMATION; RESOLUTION SYSTEMS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84865448192     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. G. Bouma, I. Fahmi, J. Mur, G. van Noord, L. van der Plas, and J. Tiedeman. 2005. Linguistic knowledge and question answering. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 2(46):15-39.
2. G. Bouma, W. Daelemans, I. Hendrickx, V. Hoste, and A. Mineur. 2007a. The COREA-project, manual for the annotation of coreference in Dutch texts. Technical report, University Groningen.
3. G. Bouma, G. Kloosterman, J. Mur, G. van Noord, L. van der Plas, and J. Tiedeman. 2007b. Question answering with Joost at QA@CLEF 2007. In Working Notes for the CLEF Workshop.
4. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, P. Berck, and S. Gillis. 1996. Mbt: A memory-based part of speech tagger generator. In Proceedings of the 4th ACL/SIGDAT Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 14-27.
5. W. Daelemans, V. Hoste, F. De Meulder, and B. Naudts. 2003. Combined optimization of feature selection and algorithm parameter interaction in machine learning of language. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML-2003), pages 84-95.
6. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, K. Van der Sloot, and A. Van den Bosch. 2004. TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 5.1, reference manual. Technical Report ILK-0402, ILK, Tilburg University.
7. F. Fisher, S. Soderland, J. McCarthy, F. Feng, and W. Lehnert. 1995. Description of the umass system as used for muc-6. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), pages 127-140.
8. S. Harabagiu, R. Bunescu, and S. Maiorano. 2001. Text and knowledge mining for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics (NAACL-2001), pages 55-62.
9. I. Hendrickx, V. Hoste, and W. Daelemans. 2008. Semantic and Syntactic features for Anaphora Resolution for Dutch. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4919:351-361.
10. E. Hinrichs, S. Kübler, and K. Naumann. 2005. A unified representation for morphological, syntactic, semantic, and referential annotations. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation II: Pie in the Sky, pages 13-20.
11. L. Hirschman, P. Robinson, J. Burger, and M. Vilain. 1997. Automating coreference: The role of annotated training data. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Applying Machine Learning to Discourse Processing.
12. J. R. Hobbs. 1978. Resolving pronoun references. Lingua, 44:311-338.
13. V. Hoste and G. de Pauw. 2006. Knack-2002: a richly annotated corpus of dutch written text. In The fifth international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC).
14. V. Hoste. 2005. Optimization Issues in Machine Learning of Coreference Resolution. Ph. D. thesis, Antwerp University.
15. P. Lendvai. 2005. Conceptual taxonomy identification in medical documents. In Proceedings of The Second International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Ontologies, pages 31-38.
16. J. McCarthy and W. Lehnert. 1995. Using decision trees for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1050-1055.
17. R. Mitkov. 1998. Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-1998/ACL-1998), pages 869-875.
18. MUC-7. 1998. Muc-7 coreference task definition. version 3.0. In Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference (MUC-7).
19. V. Ng and C. Cardie. 2002a. Combining sample selection and error-driven pruning for machine learning of coreference rules. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2002), pages 55-62.
20. V. Ng and C. Cardie. 2002b. Identifying anaphoric and non-anaphoric noun phrases to improve coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-2002).
21. M. Poesio and R. Vieira. 1998. A corpus-based investigation of definite description use. Computational Linguistics, 24(2):183-216.
22. S. P. Ponzetto and M. Strube. 2006. Exploiting semantic role labeling, wordnet and wikipedia for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Main Conference, pages 192-199.
23. E. Rich and S. LuperFoy. 1988. An architecture for anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 18-24.
24. W. M. Soon, H. T. Ng, and D. C. Y. Lim. 2001. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics, 27(4):521-544.
25. Y. Versley. 2006. Disagreement dissected: Vagueness as a source of ambiguity in nominal (co-) reference. In Proceedingsof Ambiguity in Anaphora ESSLLI Workshop, pages 83-89.
26. M. Vilain, J. Burger, J. Aberdeen, D. Connolly, and L. Hirschman. 1995. A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), pages 45-52.
27. P. Vossen, editor. 1998. EuroWordNet: a multilingual database with lexical semantic networks. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA.
28. X. Yang, G. Zhou, S. Su, and C. L. Tan. 2003. Coreference resolution using competition learning approach. In Proceedings of the 41th Annual Meeting of the Association for Compuatiational Linguistics (ACL-03), pages 176-183.