Diagrams as locality aids for explanation and model construction in cell biology

Biology and Philosophy

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 705-721

  Jones, Nicholaos ^a   Wolkenhauer, Olaf ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^c STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Cell biology; Diagram; Explanation; Locality aid; Model construction

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CELL ORGANELLE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHILOSOPHY;

EID: 84865409690     PISSN: 01693867     EISSN: 15728404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10539-012-9311-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bechtel W, Abrahamsen A (2005) Explanation: a mechanistic alternative. Stud History Philos Biol Biomed Sci 36: 421-441.
2. Bechtel W, Richardson RC (2010) Discovering complexity: decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Brown JR (1997) Proofs and pictures. Br J Philos Sci 48: 161-180.
4. Crampin EJ, Schnell S, McCharry PE (2004) Mathematical and computational techniques to deduce complex biochemical reaction mechanisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 86: 77-112.
5. Cummins R (1975) Functional analysis. J Philos 72: 741-765.
6. Goldbeter A (1991) A minimal cascade model for the mitotic oscillator involving cyclin and Cdc2 kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88: 9107-9111.
7. Goodwin W (2010) How do structural formulas embody the theory of organic chemistry? Br J Philos Sci 61: 621-633.
8. Heinrich R, Schuster S (1996) The regulation of cellular systems. Chapman & Hall, New York.
9. Hempel CG (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. Free Press, New York.
10. Kell DB, Knowles J (2010) The role of modelling in systems biology. In: Szallasi Z, Stelling J, Periwal V (eds) System modeling in cellular biology: from concepts to nuts and bolts. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 3-18.
11. Koedinger KR (1992) Emergent properties and structural constraints: advantages of diagrammatic representations for reasoning and learning. AAAI technical report SS-92-02, pp 151-156.
12. Le Novère N, Hucka M, Mi H, Moodie S, Schreiber F, Sorokin A, Demir E, Wegner K, Aladjem MI, Wimalaratne SM, Bergman FT, Gauges R, Ghazal P, Kawaji H, Li L, Matsuoka Y, Villéger A, Boyd SE, Calzone L, Courtot M, Dogrusoz U, Freeman TC, Funahashi A, Ghosh S, Jouraku A, Kim S, Kolpakov F, Luna A, Sahle S, Schmidt E, Watterson S, Wu G, Goryanin I, Kell DB, Sander C, Sauro H, Snoep JL, Kohn K, Kitano H (2009) The systems biology graphical notation. Nat Biotechnol 27: 735-741.
13. Millat T, Bullinger E, Rohwer J, Wolkenhauer O (2007) Approximations and their consequences for dynamic modeling of signal transduction pathways. Math Biosci 207: 40-57.
14. Nurse P (1990) Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase. Nature 344: 503-508.
15. Nurse P (2000) A long twentieth century of the cell cycle and beyond. Cell 100: 71-78.
16. Perini L (2005a) Explanation in two dimensions: diagrams and biological explanation. Biol Philos 20: 257-269.
17. Perini L (2005b) The truth in pictures. Philos Sci 72: 262-285.
18. Piccinini G, Craver C (forthcoming) Integrating psychology and neuroscience: functional analyses as mechanism sketches. Synthese. doi: 10. 1007/s11229-011-9898-4.
19. Saraiya P, North C, Duca K (2005) Visualizing biological pathways: requirements analysis, systems evaluation and research agenda. Inform Vis 4: 1-15.
20. Schafer KA (1998) The cell cycle: a review. Vet Pathol 35: 461-478.
21. Sible JC, Tyson JJ (2007) Mathematical modeling as a tool for investigating cell cycle control networks. Methods 41: 238-247.
22. Tyson JJ (1991) Modeling the cell division cycle: Cdc2 and cyclin interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88: 7328-7332.