메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 376-381

Altruism or solidarity? The motives for organ donation and two proposals

Author keywords

Altruism; Directed donation; Incentives; Organ donation; Organ procurement; Solidarity

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; COOPERATION; DIRECTED TISSUE DONATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TRANSPLANTATION;

EID: 84865385286     PISSN: 02699702     EISSN: 14678519     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01989.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (49)

References (31)
  • 1
    • 84872620902 scopus 로고
    • The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: Allen and Unwin; P. Singer. Altruism and Commerce: A Defense of Titmuss against Arrow.
    • (though Titmuss is specifically concerned with blood, rather than organs). As I was putting the finishing touches to this paper, controversy erupted over the issue of payments in the UK due to S. Rabbitt Roff, 'We Should Consider Paying Kidney Donors', Br Med J 2011; 343: d4867 [doi:10.1136/bmj.d4867]. See the quoted remarks of Dr Tony Calland quoted by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). 2011. Kidney Donors Payments 'Would Save Lives'. London: BBC. Available at: [accessed 3 Aug 2011].
    • R. Titmuss. 1970. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: Allen and Unwin; P. Singer. Altruism and Commerce: A Defense of Titmuss against Arrow. Philos Public Aff 1973; 2: &(though Titmuss is specifically concerned with blood, rather than organs). As I was putting the finishing touches to this paper, controversy erupted over the issue of payments in the UK due to S. Rabbitt Roff, 'We Should Consider Paying Kidney Donors', Br Med J 2011; 343: d4867 [doi:10.1136/bmj.d4867]. See the quoted remarks of Dr Tony Calland quoted by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). 2011. Kidney Donors Payments 'Would Save Lives'. London: BBC. Available at: [accessed 3 Aug 2011]. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-14379215
    • (1970) Philos Public Aff , vol.2
    • Titmuss, R.1
  • 2
    • 84865368808 scopus 로고
    • For a variety of perspectives on altruism, see the papers collected in J. Mansbridge, ed.. Beyond Self-Interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    • For a variety of perspectives on altruism, see the papers collected in J. Mansbridge, ed. 1990. Beyond Self-Interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    • (1990)
  • 3
    • 84906163084 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ed. The Ethics of Altruism. London: Frank Cass.
    • J. Seglow, 2004 ed. The Ethics of Altruism. London: Frank Cass.
    • (2004)
    • Seglow, J.1
  • 4
    • 84865350495 scopus 로고
    • The Possibility of Altruism. Oxford: Clarendon Press
    • T. Nagel. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 79.
    • (1970) , pp. 79
    • Nagel, T.1
  • 5
    • 85055300661 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Introduction: Egoism, Altruism, and Impartiality.
    • 215-6
    • C. McBride and J. Seglow. Introduction: Egoism, Altruism, and Impartiality. Res Publica 2003; 9: 213-222: 215-6.
    • (2003) Res Publica , vol.9 , pp. 213-222
    • McBride, C.1    Seglow, J.2
  • 6
    • 0024185188 scopus 로고
    • A duty to donate is suggested by D. Peters. A Unified Approach to Organ Donor Recruitment, Organ Procurement, and Distribution.
    • A duty to donate is suggested by D. Peters. A Unified Approach to Organ Donor Recruitment, Organ Procurement, and Distribution. J Law Health 1988-9; 3: 157-187
    • (1988) J Law Health , vol.3 , pp. 157-187
  • 7
    • 0038127134 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Modified Mandated Choice for Organ Procurement.
    • P. Chouhan & H. Draper. Modified Mandated Choice for Organ Procurement. J Med Ethics 2003; 29: 157-162
    • (2003) J Med Ethics , vol.29 , pp. 157-162
    • Chouhan, P.1    Draper, H.2
  • 8
    • 77952531763 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Normative Consent and Opt-Out Donation.
    • B. Saunders. Normative Consent and Opt-Out Donation. J Med Ethics 2010; 36: 84-87.
    • (2010) J Med Ethics , vol.36 , pp. 84-87
    • Saunders, B.1
  • 9
    • 34249786238 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Solidarity and Justice as Guiding Principles in Genomic Research.
    • R. Hoedemaekers, B. Gordijn & M. Pijnenburg. Solidarity and Justice as Guiding Principles in Genomic Research. Bioethics 2007; 21: 342-350.
    • (2007) Bioethics , vol.21 , pp. 342-350
    • Hoedemaekers, R.1    Gordijn, B.2    Pijnenburg, M.3
  • 10
    • 67449116881 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Solidarity and the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
    • D. Gunson. Solidarity and the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. J Med Philos 2009; 34: 241-260.
    • (2009) J Med Philos , vol.34 , pp. 241-260
    • Gunson, D.1
  • 11
    • 67349112001 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Justice and Solidarity: The Contractarian Case against Global Justice.
    • 120
    • D. Heyd. Justice and Solidarity: The Contractarian Case against Global Justice. J Soc Philos 2007; 38: 112-130: 120.
    • (2007) J Soc Philos , vol.38 , pp. 112-130
    • Heyd, D.1
  • 12
    • 79954584272 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Will Biomedical Enhancements Undermine Solidarity, Responsibility, Equality and Autonomy?
    • O. Lev. Will Biomedical Enhancements Undermine Solidarity, Responsibility, Equality and Autonomy? Bioethics 2001; 25: 177-184.
    • (2001) Bioethics , vol.25 , pp. 177-184
    • Lev, O.1
  • 13
    • 84867854030 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Solidarity and Social Moral Rules. Ethic Theory Moral Prac. Forthcoming. DOI 10.1007/s10677-011-9313-8. Published online 4 Nov 2011
    • A. Cureton. Solidarity and Social Moral Rules. Ethic Theory Moral Prac. Forthcoming. DOI 10.1007/s10677-011-9313-8. Published online 4 Nov 2011.
    • Cureton, A.1
  • 14
    • 84865350503 scopus 로고
    • On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • D. Miller. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 17-47
    • (1995) , pp. 17-47
    • Miller, D.1
  • 15
    • 0004197029 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nationhood and Political Theory.
    • M. Canovan. 1996. Nationhood and Political Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 27-36.
    • (1996) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar , pp. 27-36
    • Canovan, M.1
  • 16
    • 0001382505 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kin Altruism, Reciprocal Altruism, and the Big Five Personality Factors.
    • M. Ashton, et al. Kin Altruism, Reciprocal Altruism, and the Big Five Personality Factors. Evol Hum Behav 1998; 19: 243-255.
    • (1998) Evol Hum Behav , vol.19 , pp. 243-255
    • Ashton, M.1
  • 17
    • 0003408195 scopus 로고
    • The Selfish Gene. Revised edition.
    • Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • R. Dawkins. 1989. The Selfish Gene. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • (1989)
    • Dawkins, R.1
  • 18
    • 79958842948 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Normative Consent and Organ Donation: A Vindication.
    • B. Saunders. Normative Consent and Organ Donation: A Vindication. J Med Ethics 2011; 37: 632-633.
    • (2011) J Med Ethics , vol.37 , pp. 632-633
    • Saunders, B.1
  • 19
    • 84865384332 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Public Health: Why an NHS is Morally Indefensible.
    • I. Brassington. 2007. Public Health: Why an NHS is Morally Indefensible. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
    • (2007) Exeter: Imprint Academic
    • Brassington, I.1
  • 20
    • 84856772419 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opt-Out Organ Donation without Presumptions.
    • B. Saunders. Opt-Out Organ Donation without Presumptions. J Med Ethics 2012; 38: 69-72.
    • (2012) J Med Ethics , vol.38 , pp. 69-72
    • Saunders, B.1
  • 21
    • 33749185884 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Bioethics.
    • N. Bostrom & T. Ord. The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Bioethics. Ethics 2006; 116: 656-680.
    • (2006) Ethics , vol.116 , pp. 656-680
    • Bostrom, N.1    Ord, T.2
  • 22
    • 0024393795 scopus 로고
    • Cadaveric Organ Donation: Ethical Considerations for a New Approach.
    • I. Kleinman & F. Lowy. Cadaveric Organ Donation: Ethical Considerations for a New Approach. CMAJ 1989; 141: 107-110
    • (1989) CMAJ , vol.141 , pp. 107-110
    • Kleinman, I.1    Lowy, F.2
  • 23
    • 84865366490 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Changing Organ Allocation will Increase Organ Supply.
    • D. Undis. Changing Organ Allocation will Increase Organ Supply. De Paul Law Rev 2005-6; 55: 889-896.
    • (2005) De Paul Law Rev , vol.55 , pp. 889-896
    • Undis, D.1
  • 24
    • 77949875843 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A New Law for Allocation of Donor Organs in Israel.
    • J. Lavee et al. A New Law for Allocation of Donor Organs in Israel. Lancet 2010; 375: 1131-1133
    • (2010) Lancet , vol.375 , pp. 1131-1133
    • Lavee, J.1
  • 25
    • 80053309998 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Lifetime Probabilities of Needing an Organ Transplant Versus Donating an Organ After Death.
    • 2088
    • S.D. Shemie et al. Lifetime Probabilities of Needing an Organ Transplant Versus Donating an Organ After Death. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 2085-2092: 2088.
    • (2011) Am J Transplant , vol.11 , pp. 2085-2092
    • Shemie, S.D.1
  • 26
    • 84872618976 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • And these ways need not be financial. One might 'contribute' by living a healthy lifestyle that puts less strain on the health service. If such a person needs a liver transplant, it would seem unfair to give priority to an alcoholic, whose liver disease was self-inflicted, simply because the latter was a registered donor.
    • And these ways need not be financial. One might 'contribute' by living a healthy lifestyle that puts less strain on the health service. If such a person needs a liver transplant, it would seem unfair to give priority to an alcoholic, whose liver disease was self-inflicted, simply because the latter was a registered donor.
  • 27
    • 84872604489 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Though perhaps not much more complicated. Maybe all that is necessary is that others be willing to cooperate, whether or not they can.
    • Though perhaps not much more complicated. Maybe all that is necessary is that others be willing to cooperate, whether or not they can.
  • 28
    • 84872616280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • I would suggest that we allow donors to specify a priority, but not to restrict their organs absolutely. Thus, one may insist that one's organ will go to a white person in preference to any black people, but not that it could never go to a black person, if there were no whites on the waiting list. But this is a matter of practical implementation, rather than policy.
    • I would suggest that we allow donors to specify a priority, but not to restrict their organs absolutely. Thus, one may insist that one's organ will go to a white person in preference to any black people, but not that it could never go to a black person, if there were no whites on the waiting list. But this is a matter of practical implementation, rather than policy.
  • 29
    • 0003559821 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A Theory of Justice. Revised edition.
    • Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • J. Rawls. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 53.
    • (1999) , pp. 53
    • Rawls, J.1
  • 30
    • 84872621204 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Though age might figure in determining priority for transplants. Moreover it might be worried that some other criteria, such as compatibility, might amount to indirect discrimination. I bracket such concerns here.
    • Though age might figure in determining priority for transplants. Moreover it might be worried that some other criteria, such as compatibility, might amount to indirect discrimination. I bracket such concerns here.
  • 31
    • 84872606856 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Moreover, it should be remembered that if one organ has a 'whites only' directive, giving that organ to a white recipient may free up the undirected organ that they would have received for a black person. We may even adjust existing allocation criteria to minimize the effects of discrimination. For instance, if the top of our waiting list has 1) white
    • Moreover, it should be remembered that if one organ has a 'whites only' directive, giving that organ to a white recipient may free up the undirected organ that they would have received for a black person. We may even adjust existing allocation criteria to minimize the effects of discrimination. For instance, if the top of our waiting list has 1) white


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.