The financial impact of joint registries in identifying poorly performing implants

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 8 SUPPL., 2012, Pages

  Luo, Randy ^a   Brekke, Adam ^b   Noble, Philip C ^a,b  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b IORE   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Implants; Joint registries

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; IMPLANT REGISTRY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 84865354274     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.046     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Lavernia C.J., Guzman J.F., Gachupin-Garcia A. Cost effectiveness and quality of life in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997, 134.
2. Sharkey P.F., Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H., et al. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 7.
3. Bozic K.J., Katz P., Cisternas M., et al. Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:570.
4. Burns A.W., Bourne R.B., Chesworth B.M., et al. Cost effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 446:29.
5. Ong K.L., Mowat F.S., Chan N., et al. Economic burden of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in Medicare enrollees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 446:22.
6. Rorabeck C.H., Murray P. Cost effectiveness of revision total knee replacement. Instr Course Lect 1997, 46:237.
7. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1097.
8. Stengel D., Bauwens K., Ekkernkamp A., et al. Efficacy of total ankle replacement with meniscal-bearing devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005, 125:109.
9. Yasunaga H., Tsuchiya K., Matsuyama Y., et al. High-volume surgeons in regard to reductions in operating time, blood loss, and postoperative complications for total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2009, 14:3.
10. Malchau H., Herberts P., Eisler T., et al. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A(Suppl 2):2.
11. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Annual Report 2008, AOA, Adelaide.
12. Graves S.E., Davidson D., Ingerson L., et al. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Med J Aust 2004, 180(5 Suppl):S31.
13. Hayashi A. National joint registry legislation introduced. AAOS 2009.
14. Slover J., Espehaug B., Havelin L.I., et al. Tosteson A. Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in elderly low-demand patients. A Markov decision analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:2348.
15. Vale L., Wyness L., McCormack K., et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. Health Technol Assess 2002, 6:1.
16. Wilson N.A., Schneller E.S., Montgomery K., et al. Hip and knee implants: current trends and policy considerations. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008, 27:1587.
17. Katz J.N., Barrett J., Mahomed N.N., et al. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:1909.