Cost effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 446, Issue , 2006, Pages 29-33

  Burns, Alexander W R ^a   Bourne, Robert B ^a,b   Chesworth, Bert M ^a   MacDonald, Steven J ^a   Rorabeck, Cecil H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CANADA; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; FOLLOW UP; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; ONTARIO; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION;

EID: 33744771285     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214420.14088.76     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Data from 2003 analyzed from the National Center for Health Statistics. Available at: http://www.aaos.org/ wordhtml/research/stats/patientstats.htm Accessed November 20 2005.
2. Antoniou J, Martineau PA, Filion KB, Haider S, Zukor DJ, Huk OL, Pilote L, Eisenberg MJ. In-hospital cost of total hip arthroplasty in Canada and the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2435-2439.
3. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. 2004; p. 6-7. DMAC, University of Adelaide.
4. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840.
5. Boardman DL, Lieberman JR, Thomas BJ. Impact of declining reimbursement and rising hospital costs on the feasibility of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:526-534.
6. Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Report. Total hip and total knee replacements in Canada. 2004; p. 43. Canadian Institute for Health Information.
7. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:963-974.
8. Healy WL, Finn D. The hospital cost and the cost of the implant for total knee arthroplasty. A comparison between 1983 and 1991 for one hospital. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:801-806.
9. Healy WL, Iorio R, Lemos MJ, Patch DA, Pfeifer BA, Smiley PM, Wilk RM. Single price/case price purchasing in orthopaedic surgery: experience at the Lahey Clinic. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:607-612.
10. Katz JN, Barrett J, Mahomed NN, Baron JA, Wright RJ, Losina E. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1909-1916.
11. Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongjunakorn A, Pittors K, Davis J, Shim JC, Pavlov H, Petersen M. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:74-81.
12. Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ. 1992;146:473-481.
13. Lavernia CJ, Drakeford MK, Tsao AK, Gittelsohn A, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS. Revision and primary hip and knee arthroplasty. A cost analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;311:136-141.
14. Lavernia CJ, Guzman JF, Gachupin-Garcia A. Cost effectiveness and quality of life in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:134-139.
15. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 1st Annual Report. 2004; p.4. NJR centre, Oxfordshire, England
16. New Zealand National Joint Replacement Register. 2004. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association, Canterbury District Health Board.
17. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Funding allocations 2004/2005. Published by Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Ontario Canada
18. Rorabeck CH, Murray P. The cost benefit of total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1996;19:777-779.
19. Rorabeck CH, Murray P. Cost effectiveness of revision total knee replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:237-240.
20. Saleh KJ, Dykes DC, Tweedie RL, Mohamed K, Ravichandran J, Saleh RM, Gioe TJ, Heck DA. Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:967-977.
21. Saleh KJ, Gafni A, Macaulay WB, Miric A, Saleh L, Schatzker J. Understanding economic evaluations: a review of the knee arthroplasty literature. Am J Knee Surg. 1999;12:155-160.
22. Scranton PE Jr. The cost effectiveness of streamlined care pathways and product standardization in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:182-186.
23. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2004. Available at: http://www.ort.lu.se/knee/engversion/reports.html. Accessed November 20 2005