The accu-chek mobile blood glucose monitoring system used under controlled conditions meets ISO 15197 standards in the hands of diabetes patients

Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation

Volumn 72, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 374-379

  Sachse, Daniel ^a   Bolstad, Nils ^a   Jonsson, Magnus ^b   Sæves, Ingjerd ^a   Johansson, Carolina Backman ^c   Delezuch, Weronika ^d   Hagve, Martin ^e   Hardang, Ingrid Marie M ^f   Isaksson, Helena S ^g   Ivarsson, Anna ^h   Lehto, Liisa ⁱ   Keikkala, Elina ^j   Mattsson, Niklas ^k   Ranta, Jenni K ^d   Stavelin, Anne ^l   Sudmann, Ashild Amelie ^a   Varsi, Kristin ^m  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b Lund University   (Sweden)

^c KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^f AKERSHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^g ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^h FALUN HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

ⁱ OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^j HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^k UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^l UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^m HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

more..

Author keywords

Analytical quality; Diabetes mellitus; Plasma glucose; Point of care; Self testing

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEXOKINASE; INSULIN;

ACCU CHEK MOBILE; ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC PATIENT; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSULIN PUMP; INSULIN TREATMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY DEVICE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84865331969     PISSN: 00365513     EISSN: 15027686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2012.677544     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sön ksen PH, Judd SL, Lowy C. Home monitoring of bloodglucose. Method for improving diabetic control. Lancet 1978;1:729-32. (Pubitemid 8303167)
2. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:977-86.
3. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352:837-53.
4. Vlasselaers D, Milants I, Desmet L, Wouters PJ, Vanhorebeek I, van den Heuvel I, Mesotten D, Casaer MP, Meyfroidt G, Ingels C, Muller J, Van Cromphaut S, Schetz M, Van den Berghe G. Intensive insulin therapy for patients in paediatric intensive care: a prospective, randomised controlled study. Lancet 2009;373:547-56.
5. Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Jiamsathit W. Systematic review of the benefi ts of self-monitoring of blood glucose on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008;10:S51-S66. (Pubitemid 351725043)
6. Stöc kl D, Baadenhuijsen H, Fraser CG, Libeer JC, Petersen PH, Ric ós C. Desirable routine analytical goals for quantities assayed in serum. Discussion paper from the members of the external quality assessment (EQA) Working Group A on analytical goals in laboratory medicine. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995;33:157-69.
7. Nichols JH. What is accuracy and how close must the agreement be? Diabetes Technol Ther 2005;7:558-62. (Pubitemid 40847820)
8. Christensen NG, Monsen G, Sandberg S. Utprøving av analyseinstrumenter[Evaluation of laboratory equipment]. Bergen, Norway: Alma Mater Forlag 1997.
9. Skeie S, Thue G, Nerhus K, Sandberg S. Instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose: comparisons of testing quality achieved by patients and a technician. Clin Chem 2002;48:994-1003. (Pubitemid 34680893)
10. Kristensen GBB, Nerhus K, Thue G, Sandberg S. Standardized evaluation of instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose by patients and a technologist. Clin Chem 2004;50: 1068-71. (Pubitemid 38725800)
11. Thienpont LM, Van Nieuwenhove B, Stöc kl D, Reinauer H, De Leenheer AP. Determination of reference method values by isotope dilution-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: a fi ve years ' experience of two European Reference Laboratories. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1996;34:853-60. (Pubitemid 26383887)
12. Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE. Selection and analytical evaluation of methods-with statistical techniques. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. 4th edn. St. Louis, MO, USA: Elsevier Saunders; 2006. pp. 353-405.
13. F raser CG. Biological variation: from principles to practice. Washington, DC, USA: American Association for Clinical Chemistry. 2001.
14. Burnett RW. Accurate estimation of standard deviations for quantitative methods used in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 1975;21:1935-8.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10. (Pubitemid 16134762)
16. American Diabetes Association. Self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1996;19(Suppl. 1):S62-S66.
17. International Standards Organization. In vitro diagnostic test systems-Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. ISO/ TC 212/SC. International Standard ISO 15197. Geneva, Switzerland: 2003.
18. Skeie S, Thue G, Sandberg S. Patient-derived quality specifi cations for instruments used in self-monitoring of blood glucose. Clin Chem 2001;47:67-73. (Pubitemid 32064277)
19. Barreau PB, Buttery JE. Effect of hematocrit concentration on blood glucose value determined on Glucometer II. Diabetes Care 1988;11:116-118.
20. Boyd JC, Bruns DE. Quality specifi cations for glucose meters: assessment by simulation modeling of errors in insulin dose. Clin Chem 2001;47:209-14. (Pubitemid 32142918)