Vision and IT displays: A whole new visual world

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 363-366

  Rosenfield, Mark ^a   Howarth, Peter A ^b   Sheedy, James E ^c   Crossland, Michael D ^d  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; COMPUTER; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; VISUAL DISORDER;

COMPUTERS; HUMANS; VISION DISORDERS; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 84865302956     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00936.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Rideout VJ, Foehr UG & Roberts DF. Generation M2. Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year Olds. A Kaiser Family Foundation Study. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation: Menlo Park, CA, 2010.
2. Uchino M, Schaumberg DA, Dogru M et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among Japanese visual display terminal users. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1982-1998.
3. Tsubota K & Nakamori K. Dry eyes and video display terminals. New Eng J Med 1993; 328: 584-585.
4. Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 502-515.
5. Piccoli B. A critical appraisal of current knowledge and future directions of ergophthalmology: consensus document of the ICOH Committee on 'Work and Vision'. Ergonomics 2003; 46: 348-406.
6. Salibello C & Nilsen E. Is there a typical VDT patient? A demographic analysis. J Am Optom Assoc 1995; 66: 479-483.
7. Scheiman M, Mitchell GL, Cotter S et al. A randomized clinical trial of vision therapy/orthoptics versus pencil pushups for the treatment of convergence. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 583-595.