Streambank erosion in two watersheds of the Central Claypan Region of Missouri, United States

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 249-263

  Willett, C D ^a   Lerch, R N ^b   Schultz, R C ^c   Berges, S A ^c   Peacher, R D ^c   Isenhart, T M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon; Land use; Nitrogen; Stream order; Streambank erosion; Watershed scale transport

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL CATCHMENT; BANK EROSION; BULK DENSITY; DROUGHT; EROSION RATE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; LAND USE CHANGE; RIPARIAN ZONE; SEASONALITY; SOIL NUTRIENT; STREAM CHANNEL; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

MISSOURI; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84865246101     PISSN: 00224561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2489/jswc.67.4.249     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Belsky, A.J., A. Matzke, and S. Uselman. 1999. Survey of livestock influences on stream and riparian ecosystems in the western United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54(1):419-431. (Pubitemid 30003447)
2. Bentrup, G., and J.C. Hoag. 1998. The Practical Streambank Bioengineering Guide-User's Guide for Natural Streambank Stabilization Techniques in the Arid and Semiarid Great Basin and Intermountain West. Aberdeen, ID: USDA NRCS, Interagency Riparian/Wetland Plant Development Project.
3. Berges, S.A. 2009. Ecosystem services of riparian areas: Stream bank stability and wildlife habitat. Master's thesis. Ames IA: Iowa State University.
4. Bolstad, P.V., and W.T. Swank. 1997. Cumulative impacts of land use on water quality in a southern Appalachian watershed. Journal of American Water Resources Association 33(3):519-533. (Pubitemid 127796551)
5. Clary, W.P., and J.W. Kinney. 2002. Streambank and vegetation response to simulated cattle grazing. Wetlands 22(1):139-148. (Pubitemid 34276369)
6. Couper, P., T. Stott, and I. Maddock. 2002. Insights into river bank erosion processes derived from analysis of negative erosion-pin recordings: Observations from three recent UK studies. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27(1):59-79.
7. Dewald, T.G., and K.S. Roth. 1998. The National Hydrography Dataset - Integrating the USEPA Reach File and USGS DLG. In Conference Proceedings: 1998 ESRI User Conference, San Diego, California, July 27-31, 1998. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
8. DeWolfe, M.N., W.C. Hession, and M.C. Watzin. 2004. Sediment and Phosphorus loads from streambank erosion in Vermont, USA. In Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources Management, eds. G. Sehlke, D.F. Hayes, and D.K. Stevens. Reston, VA: America Society of Civil Engineers.
9. Duijsings, J.J.H.M. 1986. Seasonal variation in the sediment delivery ratio of a forested drainage basin in Luxembourg. In Drainage Basin Sediment Delivery, ed. R.F. Hadley. International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication 159, Wallingford: International Association of Hydrological Sciences.
10. Fox, G.A., G.V. Wilson, A. Simon, E.J. Langendoen, O. Akay, and J.W. Fuchs. 2007. Measuring streambank erosion due to groundwater seepage: Correlation to bank pore water pressure, precipitation, and stream stage. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32:1558-1573. (Pubitemid 47399607)
11. Gardiner, T. 1983. Some factors promoting channel bank erosion, River Lagan, County Down. Journal of Earth Science Royal Dublin Society 5:231-239.
12. Greenberg, A.E., A.D. Eaton, and L.S. Clesceri. 1992. Part 4500, Inorganic nonmetallic constituents. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
13. Gregory, S.V., F. J. Swanson, W.A. McKee, and K.W. Cummins. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. Bioscience 41(8):540-550.
14. Hooke, J.M. 1979. An analysis of the processes of river bank erosion. Journal of Hydrology 42(1-2):39-62.
15. Jaccard, J.1998. Interaction effects in factorial analysis of variance. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series No. 07-118. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
16. Jamison, C.V., D.D. Smith, and J.F. Thornton. 1968. Soil and water research on a claypan soil. USDA-ARS Technical Bulletin 1379. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
17. Kauffman, J.B., and W.C. Krueger. 1984. Livestock impact on riparian ecosystems and streamside management implications: A review. Journal of Range Management 37:430-437.
18. Lawler, D.M. 1993. The measurement of river bank erosion and lateral channel change: A review. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 18(9):777-821. (Pubitemid 24401811)
19. Lawler, D.M., J.R. Grove, J.S. Couperthwaite, and G.J.L. Leeks. 1999. Downstream change in river bank erosion rates in the Swale-Ouse system, northern England. Hydrological Processes 13(7):977-992. (Pubitemid 29373331)
20. Lerch, R.N., and P.E. Blanchard. 2003. Watershed vulnerability to herbicide transport in northern Missouri and southern Iowa streams. Environmental Science and Technology 37(24):5518-5527. (Pubitemid 37541720)
21. Lerch, R.N., E.J. Sadler, N.R. Kitchen, K.A. Sudduth, R.J. Kremer, D.B. Meyers, C. Baffaut, S.H. Anderson, and C.H. Lin. 2008. Overview of the Mark Twain/Salt River Basin Conservation Effects Assessment Project. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):345-359, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.345.
22. Lyons, J., S.W. Trimble, and L.K. Paine. 2000. Grasses versus trees: Managing riparian areas to benefit streams of central North America. Journal of American Water Resources Association 36(4):919-930. (Pubitemid 30622825)
23. Maner, S.B. 1958. Factors influencing sediment delivery rates in the Red Hills physiographic area. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 39:669-675.
24. Maxwell, S.E., and H.D. Delany. 1990. Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
25. McGreal, W.S., and T. Gardiner. 1977. Short term measurements of erosion for a marine and a fluvial environment in County Down, Northern Ireland. Area 9(4):285-289.
26. National Academy of Sciences. 1986. Soil conservation: Assessing the National Resources Inventory. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. Nydahl, F. 1978. On the peroxodisulphate oxidation of total nitrogen in waters to nitrate. Water Resources 12:1123-1130. (Pubitemid 9041190)
28. Peacher, R. 2011. Impacts of land use on stream bank erosion in the Northeast Missouri Claypan Region. Master's thesis. Ames, IA: Iowa State University. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/10395.
29. Piercy, C., and T. Wynn. 2008. Predicting root density in streambanks. Journal of American Water Resources Association 44(2):469-508.
30. Platts, W.S. 1981. Effects of livestock grazing. In Influence of Forest and Rangeland Management on Anadromous Fish Habitat in Western North America, ed. W.R. Meehan. US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Washington, DC: US Forest Service.
31. Roehl, J.W. 1962. Sediment source area delivery ratios and influencing morphological factors. International Association of Hydrological Sciences 59:202-213.
32. Schultz, R.C., T.M. Isenhart, W.W. Simpkins, and J.P. Colletti. 2004. Riparian forest buffers in agrosystems - Lessons learned from the Bear Creek Watershed, central Iowa, USA. Agroforestry Systems 61(1):35-50. (Pubitemid 38983031)
33. Schumm, S.A., M.D. Harvey, and C.C. Watson. 1984. Incised channels: Morphology dynamics and control. Littleton, CO: Water Resources Publication.
34. Shields, F.D., Jr., S.S. Knight, and C.M. Cooper. 1994. Effects of channel incision on base flow stream habitats and fishes. Environmental Management 18(1):43-57. (Pubitemid 23348369)
35. Simon, A., M. Rinaldi, and G. Hadish. 1996. Channel evolution in the loess area of the Midwestern United States. In Proceedings of the Sixth Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 10-14, 1996. Reston, VA: Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference.
36. Sovell, L.A., B. Vondracek, J.A. Frost, and K.G. Mumford. 2000. Impacts of rotational grazing and riparian buffers on physiochemical and biological characteristics of southern Minnesota, USA, streams. Environmental Management 26(6):629-641.
37. Strahler, A.N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 8:913-920.
38. USDA NRCS (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service). 1998. Erosion and sediment delivery. Des Moines, IA: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
39. USDA NRCS. 2000a. Missouri national resources inventory soil erosion tables. Columbia, MO: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.mo.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/nri/soilerosiontbl/out/MOSE15.pdfUSDA NRCS.
40. USDA NRCS. 2000b. Missouri national resources inventory soil erosion tables. Columbia, MO: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.mo.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/nri/soilerosiontbl/out/MOSE28.pdf.
41. USDA NRCS. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. Agricultural Handbook 269. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
42. USDA SCS (Soil Conservation Service). 1983. SCS National engineering handbook, section 3: Sedimentation, 2nd ed. Washington DC: USDA Soil Conservation Service.
43. US Geological Survey. 2009. Crooked Creek near Paris, MO daily discharge data December 2007 to January 2010. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/mo/nwis/uv/?site-no=05503800 &PARAmeter-cd=00065, 63160,00060.
44. Walker, J.T., J.M. Vose, J. Knoepp, and C.D. Geron. 2009. Recovery of nitrogen pools and processes in degraded riparian zones in the southern Appalachians. Journal of Environmental Quality 38(4):1391-1399.
45. Willett, C., S.A. Berges, R.N. Lerch, and R.C. Schultz. 2009. Stream bank erosion rates of small Missouri streams. In Agroforestry comes of age: Putting science into practice, eds. M.A. Gold, and M.M. Hall. Columbia, MO: The Center for Agroforestry. http://www.centerforagroforestry.org/pubs/proceedings.pdf.
46. Willett, C.D. 2010. Streambank erosion and risk assessment of contaminant transport in Missouri watersheds. Master's thesis. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri.
47. Wilson, C.G., and R.A. Kuhnle. 2006. Determining relative contributions of eroded landscape sediment to the suspended load of Goodwin Creek using 7Be and 210Pbxs. USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory Research Report. No. 53. Washington, DC: USDA Agricultural Research Service.
48. Wilson, C.G., R.A. Kuhnle, D.D. Bosch, J.L. Steiner, P.J. Starks, M.D. Tomer, and G.V. Wilson. 2008. Quantifying relative contributions from sediment sources in Conservation Effects Assessment Project watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):523-532, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.523.
49. Wolman, M.G. 1959. Factors influencing erosion of a cohesive river bank. American Journal of Science 257(3):204-216.
50. Zaimes, G.N., R.C. Schultz, and T.M. Isenhart. 2004. Stream bank erosion adjacent to riparian forest buffers, row-cropped fields, and continuously-grazed pastures along Bear Creek in central Iowa. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59(1):19-27. (Pubitemid 38154366)
51. Zaimes, G.N., R.C. Schultz, and T.M. Isenhart. 2006. Riparian land-uses and precipitation influences on streambank erosion in central Iowa. Journal of American Water Resources Association 42(1):83-97. (Pubitemid 43346343)
52. Zaimes, G.N., R.C. Schultz, and T.M. Isenhart. 2008. Streambank soil and phosphorus losses under different riparian land-uses in Iowa. Journal of American Water Resources Association 44(4):935-947.