Receiver operating characteristic analysis of sphincter electromyography for parkinsonian syndrome

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1128-1134

  Yamamoto, Tatsuya ^a   Sakakibara, Ryuji ^a,c   Uchiyama, Tomoyuki ^a   Yamaguchi, Chiharu ^a   Nomura, Fumio ^a   Ito, Takashi ^a   Yanagisawa, Mitsuru ^a   Yano, Masashi ^a   Awa, Yusuke ^a   Yamanishi, Tomonori ^b   Hattori, Takamichi ^a   Kuwabara, Satoshi ^a  

^a CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b DOKKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c TOHO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

external anal sphincter electromyography; multiple system atrophy; parkinsonian syndrome; receiver operating characteristic analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; DIFFUSE LEWY BODY DISEASE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR UNIT POTENTIAL; PARKINSON DISEASE; PARKINSONISM; PROGRESSIVE SUPRANUCLEAR PALSY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHY DRAGER SYNDROME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; AREA UNDER CURVE; DEMENTIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; LEWY BODIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SYSTEM ATROPHY; PARKINSON DISEASE; PARKINSONIAN DISORDERS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SUPRANUCLEAR PALSY, PROGRESSIVE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84865244975     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22208     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Sakakibara R, Uchiyama T, Yamanishi T, et al. Sphincter EMG as a diagnostic tool in autonomic disorders. Clin Auton Res 2009; 19: 20-31.
2. Fowler CJ, Griffiths D, de Groat WC,. The neural control of micturition. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9: 453-66. (Pubitemid 351704950)
3. Winge K, Jennum P, Lokkegaard A, et al. Anal sphincter EMG in the diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes. Acta Neurol Scand 2010; 121: 198-203.
4. Mannen T, Iwata M, Toyokura Y, et al. The Onuf's nucleus and the external anal sphincter muscles in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Shy-Drager syndrome. Acta Neuropathol 1982; 58: 255-60. (Pubitemid 13217378)
5. O'Sullivan SS, Holton JL, Massey LA, et al. Parkinson's disease with Onuf's nucleus involvement mimicking multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 232-4. (Pubitemid 351236572)
6. Scaravilli T, Pramstaller PP, Salerno A, et al. Neuronal loss in Onuf's nucleus in three patients with progressive supranuclear palsy. Ann Neurol 2000; 48: 97-101. (Pubitemid 30432436)
7. Sakakibara R, Ito T, Uchiyama T, et al. Lower urinary tract function in dementia of Lewy body type. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 729-32. (Pubitemid 40569688)
8. Shimizu H, Yamada M, Toyoshima Y, et al. Involvement of Onuf's nucleus in Machado-Joseph disease: A morphometric and immunohistochemical study. Acta Neuropathol 2010; 120: 439-48.
9. Vodusek DB,. How to diagnose MSA early: The role of sphincter EMG. J Neural Transm 2005; 112: 1657-68. (Pubitemid 41598971)
10. Stefanova N, Bücke P, Duerr S, et al. Multiple system atrophy: An update. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 1172-8.
11. Podnar S, Fowler CJ,. Sphincter electromyography in diagnosis of multiple system atrophy: Technical issues. Muscle Nerve 2004; 29: 151-6. (Pubitemid 38040571)
12. Palace J, Chandiramani VA, Fowler CJ,. Value of sphincter electromyography in the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20: 1396-403. (Pubitemid 27446867)
13. Wenning GK, Ben-Shlomo Y, Hughes A, et al. What clinical features are most useful to distinguish definitive multiple system atrophy from Parkinson's disease ? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 434-40. (Pubitemid 30248742)
14. Gilman S, Wenning GK, Low PA, et al. Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology 2008; 26: 670-6.
15. McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology 2005; 27: 1863-72. (Pubitemid 43970103)
16. Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, et al. Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): Report of the NINDS-SPSP International Workshop. Neurology 1996; 47: 1-9. (Pubitemid 26243849)
17. Williams DR, Lees AJ,. Progressive supranuclear palsy: Clinicopathological concepts and diagnostic challenges. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 270-9.
18. Yamamoto T, Sakakibara R, Uchiyama T, et al. When is Onuf's nucleus involved in multiple system atrophy? A sphincter electromyography study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 1645-8. (Pubitemid 41697627)
19. Paviour DC, Williams D, Fowler CJ, et al. Is sphincter electromyography a helpful investigation in the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy? A retrospective study with pathological diagnosis. Mov Disord 2005; 20: 1425-30. (Pubitemid 43072650)
20. Libelius R, Johansson F,. Quantitative electromyography of the external anal sphincter in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 1250-6. (Pubitemid 30602246)
21. Tison F, Arne P, Sourgen C, et al. The value of external anal sphincter electromyography for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Mov Disord 2000; 15: 1148-57.
22. Colosimo C, Inghilleri M, Chaudhuri KR,. Parkinson's disease misdiagnosed as multiple system atrophy by sphincter electro-myography. J Neurol 2000; 247: 559-61. (Pubitemid 30598887)
23. Giladi N, Simon ES, Korczyn AD, et al. Anal sphincter EMG does not distinguish between multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 731-4. (Pubitemid 30256604)
24. Finsterer J, Mamoli B,. Satellite potentials as a measure of neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20: 585-92. (Pubitemid 27190750)
25. Nahm F, Freeman R,. Sphincter electromyography and multiple system atrophy. Muscle Nerve 2003; 28: 18-26. (Pubitemid 36775955)
26. Gilad R, Giladi N, Korczyn AD, et al. Quantitative anal sphincter EMG in multisystem atrophy and 100 controls. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 71: 596-9. (Pubitemid 33010572)
27. Podnar S, Gregory WT,. Can be sphincter electromyography reference values shared between laboratories ? Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29: 1387-92.