GPs decision-making - Perceiving the patient as a person or a disease

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 13, Issue , 2012, Pages

  André, Malin ^a,b,c   Andén, Annika ^b,d   Borgquist, Lars ^b   Rudebeck, Carl Edvard ^e,f  

^a Centre for Clinical Research   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d Bergnasets Vardcentral   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^f Regional Chief Executive's Staff and Department of Communicable Diseases and Disease Control   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERCEPTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOSOMATIC DISORDER; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC DISORDERS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SWEDEN;

EID: 84865236495     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-38     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Doctor-patient relationships in general practice-a different model. Kushner T, J Med Ethics 1981 7 128 131 10.1136/jme.7.3.128 7277407
2. Satisfaction is not all-patients' perceptions of outcome of general practice consultations, a qualitative study. Anden A, Andersson SO, Rudebeck CE, BMC Fam Pract 2005 6 43 10.1186/1471-2296-6-43 16242048 (Pubitemid 41613595)
3. To make a difference-how GPs conceive consultation outcomes. A phenomenographic study. Anden A, Andersson SO, Rudebeck CE, BMC Fam Pract 2009 10 4 10.1186/1471-2296-10-4 19146709
4. General practitioners' knowledge of their patients' psychosocial problems: multipractice questionnaire survey. Gulbrandsen P, BMJ 1997 314 1014 1018 10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1014 9112847 (Pubitemid 27149761)
5. Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. Barry CA, BMJ 2000 320 1246 1250 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1246 10797036 (Pubitemid 30240475)
6. McWinney IR, A textbook of family medicine Oxford University Press, New York 2 1997 129 178
7. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Lewin SA, Skea ZC, Entwistle V, Zwarenstein M, Dick J, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001 4 D003267
8. The legitimacy of clinical knowledge: towards a medical epistemology embracing the art of medicine. Malterud K, Theor Med 1992 Suppl 1 30 39
9. The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: qualitative study. Griffiths F, Green E, Tsouroufli M, BMJ 2005 330 511 10.1136/bmj.38336.482720.8F 15684026 (Pubitemid 40343352)
10. Physician responses to ambiguous patient symptoms. Seaburn DB, Morse D, McDaniel SH, Beckman H, Silberman J, Epstein R, J Gen Intern Med 2005 20 525 530 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0093.x 15987328 (Pubitemid 41003808)
11. Diagnosis-the Achilles heel? Howie JG, J R Coll Gen Pract 1972 22 310 315 5073372