Satisfaction is not all - Patients' perceptions of outcome of general practice consultations, a qualitative study

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 6, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Andén, Annika ^a,b   Andersson, Sven Olof ^b   Rudebeck, Carl Edvard ^c  

^a Box 80074 ^*  (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c Kalmar County Council   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONSULTATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; RESEARCH; SYMPTOM; ADOLESCENT; AGED; CHILD; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; PRESCHOOL CHILD; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPREHENSION; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 27744551164     PISSN: 14712296     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-43     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Donabedian A: Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966, 44:Suppl:166-206.
2. Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, Farmer AJ, Fenn P, Stevens RJ, Matthews DR, Stratton IM, Holman RR: A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia 2004, 47:1747-1759.
3. Tyring S, Barbarash RA, Nahlik JE, Cunningham A, Marley J, Heng M, Jones T, Rea T, Boon R, Saltzman R: Famciclovir for the treatment of acute herpes zoster: effects on acute disease and postherpetic neuralgia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Collaborative Famciclovir Herpes Zoster Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1995, 123:89-96.
4. McWhinney IR: A textbook of family medicine. second edition. New York, Oxford University Press; 1997.
5. Pendleton D STTPHP: The Consultation an approach to learning and teaching. Volume 6. Oxford, Oxford university press; 1984:117.
6. Balint M: Läkaren patienten och sjukdomen [The doctor, his patient and the illness]. Lund, studentlitteratur; 1964:396.
7. Byrne, Long: Doctors talking to patients. London, Her Majestys Stationary Office; 1976.
8. Stewart M: Patient-centered medicine. In Patient-centered care Abdington, USA, ; 2003.
9. Kinnersley P, Stott N, Peters TJ, Harvey I: The patient-centredness of consultations and outcome in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 1999, 49:711-716.
10. Hall JA, Dornan MC: Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels. Soc Sci Med 1988, 27:637-644.
11. Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K: Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 2001, 52:609-620.
12. Howie JG, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ: A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. Fam Pract 1998, 15:165-171.
13. Steine S, Finset A, Laerum E: A new, brief questionnaire (PEQ) developed in primary health care for measuring patients' experience of interaction, emotion and consultation outcome. Fam Pract 2001, 18:410-418.
14. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C, Ferrier K, Payne S: Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. Bmj 2001, 323:908-911.
15. Marton F: Studying Conceptions of Reality- A Metatheoretical Note. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 1981, 25:159-169.
16. Marton F: Phenomenography- Describing Conceptions in the World around us. Instructional Science 1981, 10:177-200.
17. Pang MF: Two faces of variation: on continuity in the phenomenographic movement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 2003, 47:145-156.
18. Eurenius E BGSC: Attitudes towards physical activity among people with reumatoid arthritis. Physiotherapy Theory and Praxis 2003, 19:53-62.
19. Hansson-Scherman M: Refusing to be Ill; a Longitudinal Study of Patients' Relationships with their Asthma/Allergy. In Acta Universitatus Gothenburgensus Goteborg, University of Goteborg; 1994.
20. Barnard A, McCosker H, Gerber R: Phenomenography: a qualitative research approach for exploring understanding in health care. Qual Health Res 1999, 9:212-226.
21. Sjostrom B, Dahlgren LO: Applying phenomenography in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 2002, 40:339-345.
22. Barry CA, Bradley CP, Britten N, Stevenson FA, Barber N: Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. Bmj 2000, 320:1246-1250.
23. Baker R, Whitfield M: Measuring patient satisfaction: a test of construct validity. Qual Health Care 1992, 1:104-109.
24. Kinnersley P, Stott N, Peters T, Harvey I, Hackett P: A comparison of methods for measuring patient satisfaction with consultations in primary care. Fam Pract 1996, 13:41-51.
25. McHorney CA, Ware JEJ, Raczek AE: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993, 31:247-263.
26. Brooks R: EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996, 37:53-72.
27. Paterson C: Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey. Bmj 1996, 312:1016-1020.
28. Ekstrom H: Keeping my Ways of Being. In Department of medicine Lund, University of Lund; 2005.
29. Svenaeus F: The Hermeneutics of Medicine and the Phenomenology of Health. In Faculty of Arts and Science Linköping, Linköpings universitet; 1999:314.
30. Malterud K: Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001, 358:483-488.