Intensive care unit nurses' information needs and recommendations for integrated displays to improve nurses' situation awareness

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 583-590

  Koch, Sven H ^a,b   Weir, Charlene ^b,c   Haar, Maral ^d   Staggers, Nancy ^b,e   Agutter, Jim ^f   Görges, Matthias ^b,g   Westenskow, Dwayne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Salt Lake City Veterans Healthcare System   (United States)

^d Architecture of Drägerwerk AG and Co KGaA   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NURSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

DATA DISPLAY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MEDICAL ERRORS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84865171068     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000678     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Kaushal R, Bates DW, Franz C, et al. Costs of adverse events in intensive care units. Crit Care Med 2007;35:2479-83.
2. Potter P, Wolf L, Boxerman S, et al. Understanding the cognitive work of nursing in the acute care environment. J Nurs Adm 2005;35:327-35.
3. DeLucia PR, Ott TE, Palmieri PA. Performance in nursing. Rev Hum Factors Ergon 2009;5:1-40.
4. Bolton LB, Gassert CA, Cipriano PF. Smart technology, enduring solutions: technology solutions can make nursing care safer and more efficient. J Healthc Inf Manag 2008;4:24-30.
5. Egan M. Clinical dashboards: impact on workflow, care quality, and patient safety. Crit Care Nurs Q 2006;29:354-61.
6. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.
7. Rothschild JM, Landrigan CP, Cronin JW, et al. The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Crit Care Med 2005;33:1694-700.
8. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 1991;324:370-6.
9. Nuckols TK, Bell DS, Liu H, et al. Rates and types of events reported to established incident reporting systems in two US hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:164-8.
10. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000;38:261-71.
11. Görges M, Markewitz BA, Westenskow DR. Improving alarm performance in the medical intensive care unit using delays and clinical context. Anesth Analg 2009;108:1546-52.
12. Miller A, Sanderson P. Clinical information use by medical and nursing staff in an ICU: a coded tables analysis. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES2005). Loews Royal Pacific Resort, Orlando, FL, 26-30 September 2005:984-8. doi:10.1177/154193120504901130
13. Hendrich A, Chow M, Skierczynski B, et al. A 36-hospital time and motion study: how do medical-surgical nurses Spend their time? Perm J 2008;12:25-34.
14. Alexander G, Staggers N. A systematic review of the designs of clinical technology: findings and recommendations for future research. Adv Nurs Sci 2009;32:252-79.
15. Leape L, Berwick D, Clancy C, et al. Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:424-8.
16. Miller RA, Gardner RM, Johnson KB, et al. Clinical decision support and electronic prescribing systems: a time for responsible thought and action. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:403-9.
17. Michels P, Gravenstein D, Westenskow DR. An integrated graphic data display improves detection and identification of critical events during anesthesia. J Clin Monit 1997;13:249-59.
18. Zhang Y, Drews F, Westenskow D, et al. Effects of integrated graphical displays on situation awareness in anaesthesiology. Cognit Tech Work 2002;4:82-90.
19. Görges M, Staggers N. Evaluations of physiological monitoring displays: a systematic review. J Clin Monit Comput 2008;22:45-66.
20. Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 1995;37:32-64.
21. Holtzblatt K, Wendell JB, Wood S. Rapid Contextual Design: A How-to Guide to Key Techniques for User-centered Design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Pub, 2005.
22. Douglas JD. Investigative Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1976.
23. Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, et al. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:143-7.
24. Jabine TB, Straf ML, Tanur JM, et al. Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines. Report of the Advanced Research Seminar on Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1984.
25. Tang Z, Mazabob J, Weavind L, et al. A time-motion study of registered nurses' workflow in intensive care unit remote monitoring. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006;2006:759-63.
26. Grobe SJ, Hughes LC. The conceptual validity of a taxonomy of nursing interventions. J Adv Nurs 1993;18:1942-61.
27. Graves J, Corcoran S. Design of nursing information systems: conceptual and practice elements. J Prof Nurs 1988;4:168-77.
28. Staggers N, Parks PL. Description and initial applications of the Staggers & Parks nurseecomputer interaction framework. Comput Nurs 1993;11:282-90.
29. Staggers N. Human-computer interaction in health care organizations. In: Englebardt S, Nelson R, eds. Information Technology in Health Care: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Science Company, 2000:321-45.
30. Effken JA. An organizing framework for nursing informatics research. Comput Inform Nurs 2003;21:316-23; quiz 324-5.
31. Potter P, Wolf L, Boxerman S, et al. An analysis of nurses' cognitive work: a new perspective for understanding medical errors. In: Henriksen K, Marks ES, Lewin DI, eds. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2005.
32. Doig AK. Graphical Cardiovascular Display for Hemodynamic Monitoring. PhD thesis. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah, 2006.
33. Gurses AP, Carayon P. Exploring performance obstacles of intensive care nurses. Appl Ergon 2009;40:509-18.
34. Donchin Y, Gospher D, Olin M, et al. A look at the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1995;23:299-300.
35. Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Helmreich RL. Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians. Crit Care Med 2003;31:956-9.
36. Di Pietro T, Coburn G, Dharamshi N, et al. What nurses want: diffusion of an innovation. J Nurs Care Qual 2008;23:140-6.
37. Vandenkerkhof EG, Hall S, Wilson R, et al. Evaluation of an innovative communication technology in an acute care setting. Comput Inform Nurs 2009;27:254-62.
38. Pronovost P, Berenholtz S, Dorman T, et al. Improving communication in the ICU using daily goals. J Crit Care 2003;18:71-5.
39. Manojlovich M, DeCicco B. Healthy work environments, nurse-physician communication, and patients' outcomes. Am J Crit Care 2007;16:536-43.
40. Beuscart-Zephir MC, Pelayo S, Anceaux F, et al. Cognitive analysis of physicians and nurses cooperation in the medication ordering and administration process. Int J Med Inform 2007;76(Suppl 1):S65-77.
41. Rasmussen J. Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Inc, 1986.
42. Rasmussen J. Cognitive Systems Engineering. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience, 1994.
43. Wachter SB, Agutter J, Syroid N, et al. The employment of an iterative design process to develop a pulmonary graphical display. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:363-72.
44. Doig AK, Albert RA, Syroid N, et al. Graphical arterial blood gas visualization tool supports rapid and accurate data interpretation. Comput Inform Nurs 2010;29:204-11.
45. Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006;6:3.