Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services in the management of public lands

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report PNW-GTR

Volumn , Issue 865, 2012, Pages 1-48

  Kline, Jeffrey D ^a   Mazzotta, Marisa J ^b  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Landscape analysis; National forest planning and management; Nonmarket values; Public benefits

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC THEORY; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; LAND MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; POLICY MAKING; PRIVATE LAND; TRADE-OFF;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84865140367     PISSN: 08874840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alston, R.H. 1979. Economic tradeoffs of multiple-use management. In: Hook, D.D.; Dunn, B.A., eds. Proceedings of the symposium on multiple-use management of forest resources. Clemson, SC: Clemson University, College of Forests and Recreation Resources: 162-185.
2. Apple, D.D. 2000. The Forest Service as a learning organization. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. http://www.fs.fed.us/publications/policy-analysis/fs_learning.html. (July 29, 2011).
3. Asah, S.; Blahna, D.J. 2012. Involving forest communities in identifying and constructing ecosystem services: Millennium Assessment and place specificity. Journal of Forestry. 110(3): 149-156.
4. Barbour, R.J.; Hayes, J.L.; Hemstrom, M.A. 2007. The Interior Northwest Landscape Analysis System: a step toward understanding integrated landscape analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning. 80: 333-344.
5. Baumol, W.J.; Bradford, D.F. 1972. Detrimental externalities and non-convexity of the production set. Economica. 39(154): 169-176.
6. Bowes, M.D.; Krutilla, J.V. 1989. Multiple-use management: the economics of public forestlands. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 357 p.
7. Boyd, J. 2004. What's nature worth? Using indicators to open the black box of ecological valuation. Resources. 154: 18-22.
8. Boyd, J.; Banzhaf, S. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics. 63: 616-626.
9. Boyd, J.; Krupnick, A. 2009. The definition and choice of environmental commodities for nonmarket valuation. Discussion Paper RFF DP 09-35. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 57 p.
10. Boyd, J.; Wainger, L. 2002. Landscape indicators of ecosystem service benefits. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 84(5): 1371-1378.
11. Brown, T.C.; Bergstrom, J.C.; Loomis, J.B. 2007. Defining, valuing, and providing ecosystem goods and services. Natural Resources Journal. 47(2): 331-376.
12. Brown, G.; Patterson, T.; Cain, N. 2010. The devil in the details: non-convexities in ecosystem services provision. Resource and Energy Economics. 33(2): 355-365.
13. Buckman, R. 2010. Personal communication. Former Deputy Director for Research, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331.
14. Champ, P.A.; Boyle, K.J.; Brown, T.C. 2003. A primer on nonmarket valuation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 576 p.
15. Collins, S.; Larry, E. 2007. Caring for our natural assets: an ecosystem services perspective. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-733. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 11 p.
16. Costanza, R. 2008. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation. 141(2): 350-352.
17. Daily, G.D. 1997. Nature's services. Washington, DC: Island Press. 392 p.
18. Desvousges, W.H.; Naughton, M.C.; Parsons, G.R. 1992. Benefits transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies. Water Resources Research. 28(3): 675-683.
19. Fisher, B.; Turner, R.K. 2008. Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biological Conservation. 141(5): 1167-1169.
20. Fisher, B.; Turner, R.K.; Morling, P. 2009a. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics. 68(3): 643-653.
21. Fisher, B.; Turner, R.K.; Zylstra, M.; Brouwer, R.; de Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Ferraro, P.; Green, R.; Hadley, D.; Harlow, J.; Jefferiss, P.; Kirkby, C.; Morling, P.; Mowatt, S.; Naidoo, R.; Paavola, J.; Strassburg, B.; Yu, D.; Balmford, A. 2009b. Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. Ecological Applications. 18(8): 2050-2067.
22. Flores, N.E. 2002. Conservation reconsidered, the economics of natural environments, and our understanding of environmental preferences. Working Paper. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Department of Economics. 56 p.
23. Freeman, A.M. 2003. The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 491 p.
24. Garber-Yonts, B.; Kerkvliet, J.; Johnson, J. 2004. Public values for species and ecosystem conservation policies in the Oregon coast range. Forest Science. 50(5): 589-602.
25. Gregory, G.R. 1955. An economic approach to multiple use. Forest Science. 1(1): 6-13.
26. Grumbine, R.E. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology. 8(1): 27-38.
27. Gwartney, J.D.; Stroup, R. 1980. Microeconomics: private and public choice. New York, NY: Academic Press. 510 p.
28. Kaufmann, M.R.; Graham, R.T.; Boyce, D.A.; Moir, W.H.; Perry, L.; Reynolds, R.T.; Bassett, R.L.; Mehlhop, P.; Edminster, C.B.; Block, W.M.; Corn, P.S. 1994. An ecological basis for ecosystem management. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-246. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 22 p.
29. King, D.M.; Mazzotta, M. 2000. Ecosystem valuation. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service and U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.ecosystemvaluation.org/. (September 26, 2011).
30. Kline, J.D. 2004. Issues in evaluating the costs and benefits of fuel treatments to reduce wildfire in the Nation's forests. Res. Note PNW-RN-542. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 26 p. http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_rn542.pdf. (November 9, 2011).
31. Kline, J.D. 2006. Defining an economics research program to describe and evaluate ecosystem services. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-700. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 46 p. http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr700.pdf. (November 9, 2011).
32. Krutilla, J. 1967. Conservation reconsidered. American Economic Review. 57(4): 777-786.
33. Lesser, J.; Dodds, D.; Zerbe, R. 1997. Environmental economics and policy. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley. 751 p.
34. Loomis, J. 2005. Updated outdoor recreation use values on national forests and other public lands. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-658. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 26 p.
35. MacCleery, D.W. 1993. American forests: a history of resiliency and recovery. Durham, NC: Forest History Society. 58 p.
36. MacCleery, D.W.; Le Master, D.C. 1999. The historical foundation and evolving context for natural resource management on federal lands. In: Szaro, R.C.; Johnson, N.C.; Sexton, W.T.; Malk, A.J., eds. Ecological stewardship: a common reference for ecosystem management. Oxford: Elsevier Science, Ltd.: 517-556. Vol. II.
37. Marsh, G.P. 1864. Man and nature. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 512 p.
38. Metz, D.; Weigel, L. 2010. Key findings from recent national opinion research on "Ecosystem Services." On file with: The Nature Conservancy, 526 East Front Street, Missoula, MT 59802.
39. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. 137 p.
40. O'Connell, P.F.; Brown, H.E. 1972. Use of production functions to evaluate multiple-use treatments on forested watersheds. Water Resources Research. 8(5): 1188-1198.
41. Office of Management and Budget. 2003. New guidelines for the conduct of regulatory analysis. Circular No. A-4. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a004_a-4/. (October 11, 2011).
42. Pearse, P.H. 1969. Toward a theory of multiple use: the case of recreation versus agriculture. Natural Resources Journal. 9(4): 561-575.
43. Peterson, G.L.; Driver, B.L.; Gregory, R., eds. 1988. Amenity resource valuation: integrating economics with other disciplines. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc. 260 p.
44. Peterson, G.L.; Randall, A., eds. 1984. Valuation of wildland resource benefits. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 258 p.
45. Polasky, S. 2008. What's nature done for you lately: measuring the value of ecosystem services. Choices. 23(2): 42-46.
46. Randall, A.; Peterson, G.L. 1984. The valuation of wildland benefits: a overview. In: Peterson, G.L.; Randall, A., eds. 1984. Valuation of wildland resource benefits. Boulder, CO: Westview Press: 1-52.
47. Resources for the Future. 2003. In appreciation of John V. Krutilla, 1922-2003. Resources. Issue 151: 2-3. http://www.rff.org/Publications/Resources/Documents/151/RFF-Resources-151.pdf. (March 9, 2012).
48. Rosenberger, R.S.; Loomis, J.B. 2001. Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation use values: a technical document supporting the Forest Service strategic plan (2000 revision). Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-72. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 59 p.
49. Smith, N.; Deal, R.; Kline, J.D.; Patterson, T.; Spies, T.; Blahna, D. 2011. Using ecosystem services as a framework for forest stewardship: executive summary. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-852. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 46 p.
50. Spies, T.A.; Johnson, K.N.; Burnett, K.M.; Ohmann, J.L.; McComb, B.C.; Reeves, G.H.; Bettinger, P.; Kline, J.D.; Garber-Yonts, B. 2007. Cumulative ecological and socio-economic effects of forest policies in coastal Oregon. Ecological Applications. 17(1): 5-17.
51. Stevens, J.A.; Montgomery, C.A. 2002. Understanding the compatibility of multiple uses on forest land: a survey of multiresource research with application to the Pacific Northwest. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-539. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 44 p.
52. Swallow, S.K.; Parks, P.J.; Wear, D.N. 1990. Policy-relevant nonconvexities in the production of multiple forest benefits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 19: 264-280.
53. Teeguarden, D.C. 1982. Multiple services. In: Duerr, W.A.; Teeguarden, D.C.; Christiansen, N.B.; Guttenberg, S., eds. Forest resource management. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press: 276-290.
54. Thomas, J.W. 1996. Stability and predictability in federal forest management- some thoughts from the Chief. Public Land and Resources Law Review. 17: 9-23.
55. Turner, R.K.; Georgiou, S.G.; Fisher, B. 2008. Valuing ecosystem services: the case of multi-functional wetlands. London: Earthscan. 240 p.
56. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. 1992. Ecosystem management of the national forests and grasslands. Memorandum 1330-1. Washington, DC.
57. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. 2005. 100 years of conservation ... for the greatest good. FS-819. Washington, DC. 9 p.
58. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. 2012. National Forest System land management. 36 CFR Part 219. Vol. 77 (68), Monday, April 9: 21162-21276.
59. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. 2000. Guidelines for preparing economic analyses. Washington, DC. 180 p. [plus appendices].
60. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. 2006. Ecological Benefits Assessment Strategic Plan. EPA-240-R-06-001. Washington, DC: Office of the Administrator. http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eed.nsf/webpages/EcologBenefitsPlan.html. (September 26, 2011).
61. Wainger, L.A.; Boyd, J.W. 2009. Valuing ecosystem services. In: McLeod, K.; Leslie, H., eds. Ecosystem-based management for the oceans. Washington, DC: Island Press: 92-114.
62. Wainger, L.A.; King, D.M.; Mack, R.N.; Price, E.W.; Maslin, T. 2010. Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions? Ecological Economics. 69: 978-987.
63. Wainger, L.; Mazzotta, M. 2011. Realizing the potential of ecosystem services: a framework for relating ecological changes to economic benefits. Environmental Management. 37(1): 710-733.
64. Walter, G.R. 1977. Economics of multiple-use forestry. Journal of Environmental Management. 5: 345-356.
65. Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary. 1990. Springfield, MA: Merriam- Webster. 1564 p.