DNA methylation, histone modifications and behaviour of AKAP95 during mouse oocyte growth and upon nuclear transfer of foreign chromatin into fully grown prophase oocytes

Folia Biologica (Czech Republic)

Volumn 60, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 163-170

  Hoffmann, Steffen ^a   Tomasik, Grzegorz ^b   Polanski, Zbigniew ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF IMMUNOBIOLOGY AND EPIGENETICS   (Germany)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

AKAP95; Chromatin; DNA methylation; Histone status; Mouse oocyte; Nuclear transfer

Indexed keywords

AKAP95 PROTEIN; ARGININE; HISTONE H4; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DNA METHYLATION; DNA MODIFICATION; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; HISTONE ACETYLATION; HISTONE MODIFICATION; MALE; MEIOSIS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; OVARY FOLLICLE CELL; PRONUCLEUS; PROPHASE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

MAMMALIA; MUS;

EID: 84865112380     PISSN: 00155500     EISSN: 25337602     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3409/fb60_3-4.163-170     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ALEXANDRE H., VAN CAUWENBERGE A., TSUKITANI Y., MULNAR DJ. 1991. Pleiotropic effect of okadaic acid on maturing mouse oocytes. Development 112: 971-980.
2. ALLIS C. D., JENUWEIN T., REINBERG D., CAPARROS M. L. 2007. Epigenetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp. 23-61.
3. BALAKIER H., CZOLOWSKA R. 1977. Cytoplasmic control of nuclear maturation in mouse oocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 110: 466-469.
4. BAO S., OBATA Y., CARROLL J., DOMEKI I., KONO T. 2000. Epigenetic modifications necessary for normal development are established during oocyte growth in mice Biol Reprod. 62: 616-621.
5. DEBEY P., SZOLLOSI M. S., SZOLLOSI D., VAUTIER D., GIROUSSE A., BESOMBES D. 1993. Competent mouse oocytes isolated from antral follicles exhibit different chromatin organization and follow different maturation dynamics. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 36: 59-74.
6. DE LA FUENTE R., EPPIG J. J. 2001. Transcriptional activity of the mouse oocyte genome: companion granulosa cells modulate transcription and chromatin remodeling. Dev. Biol. 229: 224-236.
7. DE LA FUENTE R., VIVEIROS M. M., BURNS K. H., ADASHI E. Y., MATZUK M. M., EPPIG J. J. 2004. Major chromatin remodeling in the germinal vesicle (GV) of mammalian oocytes is dispensable for global transcriptional silencing but required for centromeric heterochromatin function. Dev. Biol. 275: 447-458.
8. EGLI D., BIRKHOFF G., EGGAN K. 2008. Mediators of reprogramming: transcription factors and transitions through mitosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9: 505-516.
9. EIDE T., CARLSON C., TASKEN K. A., HIRANO T., TASKEN K., COLLAS P. 2002. Distinct but overlapping domains of AKAP95 are implicated in chromosome condensation and condensin targeting. EMBO Rep. 3: 426-432.
10. GAVIN A. C., TSUKITANI Y., SCHORDERET-SLATKINR S. 1991. Induction of M-phase entry of prophase-blocked mouse oocytes through microinjection of okadaic acid, a specific phosphatase inhibitor. Exp. Cell Res. 192: 75-81.
11. HEYMAN Y., CHAVATTE-PALMER P., LE BOURHIS D., CAMOUS S., VIGNON X., RENARD J. P. 2002. Frequency and occurrence of late-gestation losses from cattle cloned embryos. Biol. Reprod. 66: 6-13.
12. HIIRAGI T., SOLTER D. 2005. Reprogramming is essential in nuclear transfer. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 70: 417-421.
13. HIURA H., OBATA Y., KOMIYAMA J., SHIRAI M., KONO T. 2006. Oocyte growth-dependent progression of maternal imprinting in mice. Genes Cells 11: 353-361.
14. HUANG S., LITT M., FESENFELD G. 2005. Methylation of histone H4 by arginine methyltransferase PRMT1 is essential in vivo for many subsequent histone modifications. Genes and Development 19: 1885-1893.
15. KAGEYAMA S., LIU H., KANEKO N., OOGA M., NAGATA M., AOKII F. 2007. Alterations in epigenetic modifications during oocyte growth in mice. Reproduction 133: 85-94.
16. MAYER W., NIVELAU A., WALTER J., FUNDELE R., HAAF T. 2000. Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature 403: 501-502.
17. OBACK B. 2008. Climbing Mount Efficiency-small steps, not giant leaps towards higher cloning success in farm animals. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 43 Suppl 2: 407-416.
18. OBATA Y., KONO T. 2002. Maternal primary imprinting is established at a specific time for each gene throughout oocyte growth. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 5285-5289.
19. POLANSKI Z. 1997. Strain difference in the timing of meiosis resumption in mouse oocytes: involvement of a cytoplasmic factor(s) acting presumably upstream of the dephosphorylation of p34cdc2 kinase. Zygote 5: 105-109.
20. POLANSKI Z., HOFFMANN S., TSURUMI C. 2005. Oocyte nucleus controls progression through meiotic maturation. Dev. Biol. 281: 184-195.
21. POLANSKI Z., MOTOSUGI N., TSURUMI C., HIIRAGI T., HOFFMANN S. 2008. Hypomethylation of paternal DNA in the late mouse zygote is not essential for development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 52: 295-298.
22. RIDEOUT W. M.3rd, EGGAN K., JAENISCH R. 2001. Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome. Science 293: 1093-1098.
23. TARKOWSKI A. K. 1966. An air-drying method for chromosome preparation from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 5: 394-400.
24. VASSENA R., DEE SCHRAMM R., LATHAM K. E. 2005. Species-dependent expression patterns of DNA methyl-transferase genes in mammalian oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 72: 430-436.
25. WANG H., HUANG Z. Q., XIA L., FENG Q., ERDJUMENT-BROMAGE H., STRAHL B. D., BRIGGS S. D., ALLIS C. D., WONG J., TEMPST P., ZHANG Y. 2001. Methylation of histone H4 at arginine 3 facilitating transcriptional activation by nuclear hormone receptor. Science 293: 853-857.
26. WHITWORTH K. M., PRATHER R. S. 2010. Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: how can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming? Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77: 1001-1015.
27. ZUCCOTTI M., PICCINELLI A., GIORGI ROSSI P., GARAGNA S., REDI C. A. 1995. Chromatin organization during mouse oocyte growth. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 41: 479-485.
28. ZUCCOTTI M., PONCE R. H., BOIANI M., GUIZZARDI S., GOVONI P., SCANDROGLIO R., GARAGNA S., REDI C. A. 2002. The analysis of chromatin organisation allows selection of mouse antral oocytes competent for development to blastocyst. Zygote 10: 73-78.