The evaluation of residential utility demand-side management programsin California

Reality Check: The Nature and Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs in the United States, Europe, and Japan

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 138-165

  Sanstad, Alan H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865004781     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781936331123     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Blumstein , Carl , Betsy Krieg , Lee Schipper , and Carl York . 1980. Overcoming Social and Institutional Barriers to Energy Conservation. Energy 5: 355-371.
2. Brown , Marilyn A. , and Philip E. Mihlmester . 1994. Summary of California DSM Impact Evaluation Studies. Report ORNL/CON-403. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
3. CalEPA (California Environmental Protection Agency). 2006. Climate Action Team Report to Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature. Sacramento, CA: CalEPA.
4. Carnahan , Walter , et al. 1975. Efficient Use of Energy: A Physics Perspective: A Report of the Summer Study on Technical Aspects of Efficient Energy Utilization, July 1974. College Park, MD: American Physical Society.
5. CEC (California Energy Commission). 2003a. California Energy Demand 2003-2013. CEC Staff Report #100-03-002. Sacramento, CA: CEC.
6. CEC (California Energy Commission). 2003b Mike Messenger, principal author. Proposed Energy Savings Goals for Energy Efficiency Programs in California. CEC #100-03-021. Sacramento, CA: CEC.
7. CPUC (California Public Utilities Commission). 1998. Protocols and Procedures for the Verification of Costs, Benefits, and Shareholder Earnings from Demand-Side Management Programs. San Francisco, CA: CPUC.
8. Dehejia , Rajeev H. , and Sadek Wahba . 2002. Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics 84(1): 151-161.
9. Eto , Joseph . 1996. The Past, Present, and Future of U.S. Utility Demand-Side Management Programs. Report LBNL-39931/UC-1322. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
10. Eto , Joseph , Leslie Shown , Richard Sonnenblick , and Christopher Payne . 1996. The Total Cost and Measured Performance of Utility-Sponsored Energy Efficiency Programs. The Energy Journal 17(1): 31-52.
11. Fels , Margaret , and Kenneth M. Keating . 1993. Measurement of Energy Savings from Demand-Side Management Programs in US Electric Utilities. In Annual Review of Energy and the Environment (vol. 18), edited by Robert H. Socolow , Dennis Anderson , and John Harte . Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 57-88.
12. Fischer , Carolyn . 2005. On the Importance of the Supply Side in Demand-side Management. Energy Economics 27: 165-180.
13. Goett , Andrew A. 1999. 1997 Residential Energy Management Services First Year Load Impact Evaluation (Home Energy Fitness Program): Study ID No. 715. CA: AAG & Associates.
14. Goldberg , Miriam , and Kenneth Train . 1996. Net Savings Estimation: An Analysis of Regression and Discrete Choice Approaches. Madison, WI: Xenergy, Inc.
15. Hagler-Bailly Consulting. 1999. Impact Evaluation of Pacific Gas & Electric Company's 1997 Residential Energy Management Services Program (Single Family): PG&E Study ID #397.
16. Heckman , James , and Richard Robb . 1982. Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions. In Longitudinal Labor Market Studies: Theory, Methods, and Empirical Results, edited by J. Heckman and B. Singer . NY: Academic Press.
17. Horowitz , Marvin J. 2004. Electricity Intensity in the Commercial Sector: Market and Public Program Effects. The Energy Journal 25(2): 1-23.
18. Huntington , Hillard , Lee Schipper , and Alan H. Sanstad (eds.). 1994. Markets for Energy Efficiency. Energy Policy 22(10): October.
19. Jaffe , Adam B. , and Robert N. Stavins . 1994. The Energy-Efficiency Gap: What Does It Mean? Energy Policy 22(10): 804-810.
20. Joskow , Paul L. , and Donald B. Marron . 1992. What Does a Negawatt Really Cost? Evidence from Utility Conservation Programs. The Energy Journal 13(4): 41-74.
21. Kandel , Adrienne . 1999a. Instrumented Decomposition: A Two-Stage Method for Estimating Net Savings. Proceedings of the 1999 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Denver, CO.
22. Kandel , Adrienne . 1999b. Evaporative Cooler Rebate Program Cuts Load Significantly, and May Overcome Class Barrier. Proceedings of the 1999 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Denver, CO.
23. Loughran , David S. , and Jonathan Kulick . 2004. Demand-Side Management and Energy Efficiency in the United States. The Energy Journal 25(1): 19-43.
24. Nadel , Steven . 1992. Utility Demand-Side Management Experience and Potential: A Critical Review. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 17: 507-535.
25. NARUC (National Association of Regulatory Commissions). Conservation Committee. 1989. Resolution in Support of Incentives for Electric Utilities' Least-cost Planning. Washington, DC: NARUC.
26. Ozog , Michael , and Daniel Violette . 1990. Using Billing Data to Estimate Energy Savings: Specifications of Energy Savings Models, Self-Selection, and Free-Riders. In Proceedings of the ACEEE 1990 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings Panel 6: Program Evaluation, Washington, DC.
27. RER (Regional Economic Research, Inc.). 1997. 1995 In-Home Audit Evaluation: Study ID No. 528 (A).
28. Rosenfeld , Arthur H. 1999. The Art of Energy Efficiency: Protecting the Environment with Better Technology. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 24: 33-82.
29. Sanstad , Alan H. , W. Michael Hanemann , and Maximillian Auffhammer . 2006. The Role of Energy Efficiency. In The Potential Economic Costs and Benefits of Climate Change Policy in California, edited by W. Michael Hanemann and Alexander E. Farrell . San Francisco: The Energy Foundation.
30. TecMarket Works Framework Team. 2004. The California Evaluation Framework. Oregon, WI: TechMarket Works.
31. TecMarket Works Framework Team. 2006. California Energy Efficiency Evaluation Protocols: Technical, Methodological and Reporting Requirements of Evaluation Professionals. Oregon, WI: TechMarket Works.
32. Train , Kenneth , S. Buller , B. Mast , K. Parikh , and E. Paquette . 1994. Estimation of Net Savings for Rebate Programs: A Three-Option Nested Logit Approach. Proceedings of the ACEEE 1994 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Asilomar, CA.
33. Vine , Edward , Chang-Ho Rhee , and Keun-Dae Lee . 2004. Electric Utility Restructuring and Its Impact on Energy Efficiency and Measurement and Evaluation: Two Unfinished Stories (California and South Korea). Proceedings of the 2004 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Pacific Grove, CA.
34. Walker , James A. , Theador N. Rauh , and Karen Griffin . 1985. A Review of the Residential Conservation Service Program. Annual Review of Energy 10: 285-315.